We examined whether subtle exposure to sexually objectifying cues increases women’s intentions to have cosmetic surgery. Undergraduate women (N = 116) were randomly assigned to a condition in which they unscrambled sentences containing words associated with sexual objectification, non-self-objectifying physicality, or neutral content. Following a manipulation check of these primes, participants reported their body shame and intentions to have cosmetic surgery in the future. Results revealed that priming a state of self-objectification, compared to the two non-self-objectifying conditions, increased both body shame and intentions to have cosmetic surgery. In a mediational model, the link between self-objectification and intentions to have cosmetic surgery was partially mediated by body shame. Controlling for other key intrapersonal and social motives linked to interest in cosmetic surgery did not alter these patterns. These findings highlight the potential for the consumption of cosmetic surgery to stand as another harmful micro-level consequence of self-objectification that may be perpetuated via subtle exposure to sexually objectifying words, even in the absence of visual depictions or more explicit encounters of sexual objectification.
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Exposure to sexually objectifying media and body self-perceptions among college women: An examination of the selective exposure hypothesis and the role of moderating variables. Sex Roles, 55, 159–172.
4.
AubreyJ. S. (2010). Looking good versus feeling good: An investigation of media frames of health advice and their effects on women’s body-related self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 63, 50–63.
5.
AvalosL.TylkaT. L. (2006). Exploring a model of intuitive eating with college women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 486–497.
6.
BartkyS. (1990). Femininity and domination. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BernardP.GervaisS. J.AllenJ.CampomizziS.KleinO. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469–471.
8.
BraunV. (2010). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. Journal of Women’s Health, 19, 1393–1407.
BrownA.FurnhamA.GlanvilleL.SwamiV. (2007). Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 27, 501–508.
11.
CalogeroR. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: Effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.
12.
CalogeroR. M. (2011). Operationalizing self-objectification: Assessment and related methodological issues. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 23–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
CalogeroR. M. (2012). Objectification theory, self-objectification, and body image. In CashT. F. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance (Vol. 2, pp. 574–580). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
CalogeroR. M. (2013). Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318.
15.
CalogeroR. M.DavisW. N.ThompsonJ. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52, 43–50.
16.
CalogeroR. M.JostJ. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228.
17.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA. (2011). Body guilt: Preliminary evidence for a further subjective experience of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 428–440.
18.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA.ParkL. E.RahemtullaZ. K. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women’s attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32–41. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9759-5
19.
CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and directions for research and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
CalogeroR. M.ThompsonJ. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6, 145–148.
21.
CalogeroR. M.TylkaT. L. (in press). Sanctioning and stimulating resistance to sexual objectification: An integrative system justification perspective. Journal of Social Issues.
22.
CarrE. R.SzymanskiD. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66.
23.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464–478.
24.
CikaraM.EberhardtJ. L.FiskeS. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551.
25.
CoughlinJ. W.SchreyerC. C.SarwerD. B.HeinbergL. J.RedgraveG. W.GuardaA. S. (2012). Cosmetic surgery in inpatients with eating disorders: Attitudes and experience. Body Image, 9, 180–183.
26.
DavisK. (2003). Dubious equalities and embodied differences: Cultural studies on cosmetic surgery. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
27.
DavisS. (1990). Men as success objects and women as sex objects: A study of personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 23, 43–50. doi:10.1007/BF00289878
28.
DavisJ. I.SenghasA.BrandtF.OchsnerK. N. (2010). The effects of BOTOX injections on emotional experience. Emotion, 10, 433–440.
29.
de BeauvoirS. (1952). The second sex. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
30.
FisherA. R.BettendorfS. K.WangY.-W. (2011). Contextualizing sexual objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 127–139.
31.
FrederickD. A.LeverJ. L.PeplauL. A. (2007). Interest in cosmetic surgery and body image: Views of men and women across the lifespan. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120, 1407–1415.
32.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
33.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A.NollS. M.QuinnD. M.TwengeJ. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
34.
GabrielS. E.WoodsJ. E.O’FallonW. M.BeardC. M.KurlandL. T.MeltonL. J. (1997). Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 677–682.
35.
GardnerC. B. (1980). Passing by: Street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 328–356.
36.
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.AllenJ. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17.
37.
GoldenbergJ. L.CooperD. P.HeflickN. A.RoutledgeC.ArndtJ. (2011). Is objectification always harmful? Reactions to objectifying images and feedback as a function of self-objectification and mortality salience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 443–448.
38.
GrabeS.HydeJ. S.LindbergS. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164–175. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00350.x
39.
GrazerF. M.de JongR. H. (2000). Fatal outcomes from liposuction: Census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 105, 436–446.
40.
HarperB.TiggemannM. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58, 649–657.
41.
HarrellZ. A.FredricksonB. L.PomerleauC. S.Nolen-HoeksemaS. (2006). The role of trait self-objectification in smoking among college women. Sex Roles, 54, 735–743.
42.
Henderson-KingD.BrooksK. D. (2009). Materialism, sociocultural appearance messages, and paternal attitudes predict college women’s attitudes about cosmetic surgery. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 133–142. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01480.x
43.
Henderson-KingD.Henderson-KingE. (2005). Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image, 2, 137–149.
44.
Hines S. H.SampselleC. M.RonisD. L.YeoS.FredricksonB. L.BoydC. J. (2007). Women’s self-care agency to manage urinary incontinence: The impact of nursing agency and body experience. Advances in Nursing Science, 30, 175–188.
45.
HollandE.HaslamN. (In press). Worth the weight: The objectification of overweight versus thin targets. Psychology of Women Quarterly. doi: 10.1177/0361684312474800
46.
HortonR. (2012). Offline: A serious regulatory failure with urgent implications. The Lancet, 379, 204.
47.
ImpettE. A.DaubenmierJ. J.HirschmanA. L. (2006). Minding the body: Yoga, embodiment, and well-being. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 3, 39–48.
48.
ImpettE. A.Schooler D.Tolman D. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 131–144.
LangloisJ. H.KalakanisL.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
MalkinA. R.WornianK.ChrislerJ. C. (1999). Women and weight: Gendered messages on magazine covers. Sex Roles, 40, 647–655.
55.
McKinleyN. M.HydeJ. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
56.
McLaughlinJ. K.WiseT. N.LipworthL. (2004). Increased risk of suicide among patients with breast implants: Do the epidemiologic data support psychiatric consultation?Psychosomatics, 45, 277–280. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.45.4.277
57.
MoradiB. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148.
58.
MoradiB.HuangY.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
59.
MuehlenkampJ. J.SwansonJ. D.BrauschA. M. (2005). Self-objectification, risk taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24–32.
60.
MurnenS. K.SmolakL. (2000). The experience of sexual harassment among grade-school students: Early socialization of female subordination?Sex Roles, 43, 1–17. doi:10.1023/A:1007007727370
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.
64.
NussbaumM. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
65.
ParkL.CalogeroR. M.HarwinM. J.DiRaddoA-M. (2009). Predicting interest in cosmetic surgery: Interactive effects of appearance-based rejection sensitivity and negative appearance comments. Body Image, 6, 186–193.
66.
PittetB.MontandonD.PittetD. (2005). Infection in breast implants. The Lancet: Infectious Diseases, 5, 94–106.
67.
RobertsT.GettmanJ. Y. (2004). Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17–27.
68.
SaguyT.QuinnD. M.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178–182. doi:10.1177/0956797609357751
69.
SarwerD. B.MageeL.CrerandC. E. (2004). Cosmetic surgery and cosmetic medical treatment. In ThompsonJ. K. (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity (pp. 71–96). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
70.
SlevecJ. H.TiggemannM. (2010). Attitudes toward cosmetic surgery in middle-aged women: Body image, aging anxiety, and the media. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 65–74.
71.
SmolakL.MurnenS. K. (2011). The sexualization of girls and women as a primary antecedent of self-objectification. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 53–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S.Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.
73.
SteerA.TiggemannM. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225.
74.
StrelanP.MehaffeyS. J.TiggemannM. (2003). Self-objectification and esteem in young women: The mediating role of reasons for exercise. Sex Roles, 48, 89–95.
75.
SwamiV. (2007). The missing arms of Venus de milo: Reflections of the science of physical attractiveness. Brighton, CO: Book Guild.
76.
SwamiV.Chamorro-PremuzicT.BridgesS.FurnhamA. (2009). Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image, 6, 7–13.
77.
SwamiV.FurnhamA. (2008). The psychology of physical attraction. London, England: Routledge.
78.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200
79.
TiggemannM. (2011). Mental health risks of self-objectification: A review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 139–159). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
80.
TiggemannM.BoundyM. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women’s self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399–405.
81.
TiggemannM.KuringJ. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311.
82.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.
83.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62, 869–887.
84.
von SoestT.KvalemI.WichstrømL. (2012). Predictors of cosmetic surgery and its effects on psychological factors and mental health: a population-based follow-up study among Norwegian females. Psychological Medicine, 42, 617–626.
85.
ZurbriggenE. L.RamseyL. R.JaworskiB. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
