This study examined similarities and differences in women’s and men’s comparison tendencies and perfection beliefs when evaluating their face, body shape, and physical abilities, as well as how these tendencies and beliefs relate to their body esteem. College students (90 women and 88 men) completed the Body Esteem Scale and answered questions concerning their social comparison and temporal comparison tendencies related to face, body shape, and physical abilities evaluations as well as personal perfection body beliefs. As predicted, women were more likely than men to compare their face and bodies to other same-sex persons whom they perceived as having either similar or better physical qualities than themselves in those body domains, with their most likely comparison tendency being upward social comparison. More men than women held body perfection beliefs for all three body domains, and men were most likely to rely on future temporal comparison when evaluating their body shape. Comparison tendencies and perfection beliefs also were differentially related to women’s and men’s body esteem: Whereas women relied on self-critical social comparison strategies associated with negative body esteem, men’s comparison strategies and perfection beliefs were more self-hopeful. Implications for practitioners treating body image issues are discussed.
AubreyJ. S. (2007). The impact of sexually objectifying media exposure on negative body emotions and sexual self-perceptions: Investigating the mediating role of body self-consciousness. Mass Communication and Society, 10, 1–23.
2.
BaghurstT.HollanderD. B.NardellaB.HaffG. G. (2006). Change in sociocultural ideal male physique: An examination of past and present action figures. Body Image, 3, 87–91.
3.
BessenoffG. (2006). Can the media affect us? Social comparison, self-discrepancy, and the thin ideal. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 239–251.
4.
BessenoffG.Del PrioreR. (2007). Women, weight, and age: Social comparison to magazine images across the lifespan. Sex Roles, 56, 215–222.
5.
CalogeroR. M.PinaA. (2011). Body guilt: Preliminary evidence for a further subjective experience of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 428–441.
6.
CashT. F.MorrowJ. A.HraboskyJ. I.PerryA. A. (2004). How has body image changed? A cross-sectional investigation of college women and men from 1983 to 2001. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1081–1089.
7.
CecilH.StanleyM. A. (1997). Reliability and validity of adolescents’ scores on the Body Esteem scale. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 57, 340–356.
8.
CohenD.Hoshino-BrowneE. (2009). Insider and outsider perspectives on the self and social world. In SorrentinoR. M.CohenD.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Culture and social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 49–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
CollinsR. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51–69.
10.
DittmarH. (2005). Vulnerability factors and processes linking sociocultural pressures and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 1081–1087.
11.
DohntH.TiggemannM. (2006). The contribution of peer and media influences to the development of body satisfaction and self-esteem in young girls: A prospective study. Developmental Psychology, 42, 929–936.
12.
FeingoldA. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.
13.
FeingoldA.MazzellaR. (1998). Gender differences in body image are increasing. Psychological Science, 9, 190–195.
14.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 17, 117–140.
15.
FranzoiS. L. (1994). Further evidence of the reliability and validity of the body esteem scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 237–239.
16.
FranzoiS. L. (1995). The body-as-object versus body-as-process: Gender differences and gender considerations. Sex Roles, 56, 13–21.
17.
FranzoiS. L.ChangZ. (2000). The sociocultural dynamics of the physical self: How does gender shape body esteem? In HolsteinA. J.MillerG. (Eds.), Perspectives on social problem (Vol. 12, pp. 179–201). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
18.
FranzoiS. L.KessenichJ. J.SugrueP. A. (1989). Gender differences in the experience of body awareness: An experiential sampling study. Sex Roles, 21, 499–415.
19.
FranzoiS. L.KlaiberJ. R. (2007). Body use and reference group impact. Sex Roles, 55, 205–214.
20.
FranzoiS. L.ShieldsS. A. (1984). The Body Esteem scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 173–178.
21.
FrederickD. A.BuchananG. M.Sadehgi-AzarL.PeplauL. A.HaseltonM. G.BerezovskayaA.LipinskiR. E. (2007). Desiring the muscular ideal: Men’s body satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 103–117.
22.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
23.
Fuller-TyszkiewiczM.ReynardK.SkouterisH.McCabeM. (2012). An examination of the contextual determinants of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 76–88.
24.
GrabeS.WardL. M.HydeJ. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 460–476.
25.
GroganS. (2008). Body image: Understanding body dissatisfaction in men, women, and children. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
27.
HobzaC. L.RochlenA. B. (2009). Gender role conflict, drive for muscularity, and the impact of ideal media portrayals on men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 120–130.
28.
ImpettE. A.HensonJ. M.BreinesJ. G.SchoolerD.TolmanD. L. (2011). Embodiment feels better: Girls’ body objectification and well-being across adolescence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 46–58.
29.
JamesK. (2000). You can feel them looking at you: The experiences of adolescent girls at swimming pools. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 262–280.
30.
KrahéBKrauseC. (2010). Presenting thin media models affect women’s choice of diet or normal snacks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 349–355.
31.
LangloisJ. H.KalakanisL.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.
32.
LeitR. A.PopeH. G.GrayJ. J. (2001). Cultural expectations of muscularity in men: The evolution of Playgirl centerfolds. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 90–93.
33.
LevineM. P.MurnenS. K. (2009). “Everybody knows that mass media are/are not [pick one] a cause of eating disorder”: A critical review of evidence for a causal link between media, negative body image, and disordered eating in females. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 9–42.
34.
LiN. P.ValentineK. A.PatelL. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 291–294.
35.
LinY-C.RaghubirP. (2005). Gender differences in unrealistic optimism about marriage and divorce: Are men more optimistic and women more realistic?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 198–207.
36.
MangunkusumoR. T.MoormanP. W.Van Den Berg-de RuiterA. E.Van Der LeiJ.De KoningH. J.RaatH. J. (2005). Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study. Adolescent Health, 36, 1–6.
37.
McKinleyN. M. (2011). Continuity and change in self-objectification: Taking a life-span approach to women’s experiences of objectified body consciousness. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 101–115). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
MillerD. T.RossM. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.
39.
MoradiB.HuangY.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
40.
MurnenS. K.SmolakL.MillsJ. A.GoodL. (2003). Thin, sexy women and strong, muscular men: Grade-school children’s responses to objectified images of women and men. Sex Roles, 49, 427–437.
41.
PallierG. (2003). Gender differences in the self-assessment of accuracy on cognitive tasks. Sex Roles, 48, 265–276.
42.
PowellJ. L.MatacinM. L.StuartA. E. (2001). Body esteem: An exception to self-enhancing illusions?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1951–1978.
43.
RidgewayR. T.TylkaT. L. (2005). College men’s perceptions of ideal body composition and shape. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6, 209–220.
44.
SchoolerD.WardL. M. (2006). Average Joes: Men’s relationships with media, real bodies, and sexuality. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 7, 27–41.
45.
ShafferJ. P. (1995). Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 561–584.
46.
SteenhuisM. P.SerraM.MinderaaR. B.HartmanC. A. (2009). An Internet version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV): Correspondence of the ADHD section with the paper-and-pencil version. Psychological Assessment, 21, 231–234.
47.
StrahanE. J.LaFranceA.WilsonA. E.EthierN.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2008). Victoria’s dirty secret: How sociocultural norms influence adolescent girls and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 288–301.
48.
StrahanE. J.WilsonA.CressmanK.BuoteV. (2006). Comparing to perfection: How cultural norms for appearance affect social comparisons and self-image. Body Image, 3, 211–227.
49.
StreeterS. A.McBurneyD. H. (2003). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: New evidence and a critique of a “critical test.”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 88–98.
50.
SummervilleA.RoeseN. J. (2008). Dare to compare: Fact-based versus simulation-based comparison in daily life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 664–671.
51.
SwamiV.ColesR.WilsonE.SalemN.WyrosumskaK.FurnhamA. (2010). Oppressive beliefs at play: Associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual difference in sexism, objectification of others, and media exposure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 365–379.
52.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181–227). New York, NY: Academic Press.
53.
TiggemannM.PolivyJ. (2010). Upward and downward: Social comparison processing of thin idealized media images. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 356–364.
54.
TiggemannM.RothblumE. D. (1997). Gender differences in internal beliefs about weight and negative attitudes towards self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 581–593.
55.
TolmanD. L.ImpettE. A.TracyA. J.MichaelA. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 85–95.
56.
TownsendJ. M.WassermanT. (1997). The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 243–268.
57.
TrampeD.StapelD. A.SieroF. W. (2005). On models and vases: Body dissatisfaction and proneness to social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 106–118.
58.
van den BergP.PaxtonS. J.KeeryH. (2007). Body dissatisfaction and body comparison with media images in males and females. Body Image, 4, 257–268.
59.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 928–942.
60.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and current selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 572–584.
61.
YoderJ. D.KahnA. S. (2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 281–290.
62.
ZellE.AlickeM. D. (2009). Self-evaluative effects of temporal and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 223–227.
