The media’s portrayal of women is often sexually objectifying, and greater exposure to objectifying media is associated with higher levels of self-objectification among young women. One reason why media usage may be associated with self-objectification is because women may be comparing their appearance to others in the media. The present study examined (a) the relationship between the usage of different media types (online social media [Facebook], Internet, television, music videos, and magazines) and self-objectification among young women, (b) whether appearance comparison tendencies in general mediated any observed relationships, and (c) whether appearance comparisons to specific types of women on Facebook (self, family, close friends, distant peers, and celebrities) mediated any relationship between Facebook usage and self-objectification. Female participants (N = 150) aged 17–25 years completed questionnaires about their media usage, appearance comparison tendency in general, appearance comparisons to specific target groups on Facebook, and self-objectification. Results showed that Facebook usage and magazine usage were positively correlated with self-objectification and that these relationships were mediated by appearance comparisons in general. In addition, the relationship between Facebook usage and self-objectification was mediated by comparisons to one’s peers on Facebook. These findings suggest that appearance comparisons can play an important role in self-objectification among young women.
AubreyJ. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a two-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386.
3.
AubreyJ. S.FrisbyC. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre. Mass Communication and Society, 14, 475–501. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.513468
BairC. E.KellyN. R.SerdarK. L.MazzeoS. E. (2012). Does the Internet function like magazines? An exploration of image-focused media, eating pathology, and body dissatisfaction. Eating Behaviors, 13, 398–401. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh. 2012.06.003
6.
BakerC. N. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements: A content analysis of black- and white-oriented women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles, 52, 13–27. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1190-y
7.
BellB. T.DittmarH. (2011). Does media type matter? The role of identification in adolescent girls’ media consumption and the impact of different thin-ideal media on body image. Sex Roles, 65, 478–490. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9964-x
8.
CalogeroR. M. (2011). Operationalizing self-objectification: Assessment and related methodological issues. In CalogeroR. M.Tantleff-DunnS.ThompsonJ. K. (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 23–49). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12304-002
FardoulyJ.DiedrichsP. C.VartanianL. R.HalliwellE. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12. 002
11.
FardoulyJ.VartanianL. R. (2015). Negative comparisons about one’s appearance mediate the relationship between Facebook usage and body image concerns. Body Image, 12, 82–88. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.10.004
12.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
13.
Fitzsimmons-CraftE. E.Bardone-ConeA. M. (2012). Examining prospective mediation models of body surveillance, trait anxiety, and body dissatisfaction in African American and Caucasian college women. Sex Roles, 67, 187–200. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0151-5
14.
FranzoiS. L.VasquezK.SparapaniE.FrostK.MartinJ.AeblyM. (2012). Exploring body comparison tendencies: Women are self-critical whereas men are self-hopeful. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 99–109. doi:10.1177/0361684311427028
15.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
16.
GrabeS.HydeJ. S. (2009). Body objectification, MTV, and psychological outcomes among female adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2840–2858. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00552.x
17.
HaferkampN.EimlerS. C.PapadakisA. M.KruckJ. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 91–98. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0151
18.
HalliwellE.MalsonH.TischnerI. (2011). Are contemporary media images which seem to display women as sexually empowered actually harmful to women?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 38–45. doi:10.1177/ 0361684310385217
19.
HarperB.TiggemannM. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58, 649–657. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9379-x
20.
HewK. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 662–676. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020
21.
KeeryH.van den BergP.ThompsonJ. K. (2004). An evaluation of the tripartite model of body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance with adolescent girls. Body Image, 1, 237–251. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.03.001
22.
LeaheyT.CrowtherJ.MickelsonK. (2007). The frequency, nature, and effects of naturally occurring appearance-focused social comparisons. Behavior Therapy, 38, 132–143. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.06.004
23.
LewA.-M.MannT.MyersH.TaylorS.BowerJ. (2007). Thin-ideal media and women’s body dissatisfaction: Prevention using downward social comparisons on non-appearance dimensions. Sex Roles, 57, 543–556. doi:10.1007/ s11199-007-9274-5
24.
LindnerD.Tantleff-DunnS.JentschF. (2012). Social comparison and the ‘circle of objectification.’Sex Roles, 67, 222–235. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0175-x
25.
Mayer-SchönbergerV.CukierK. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
26.
MeierE. P.GrayJ. (2014). Facebook photo activity associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 4, 199–206. doi:10.1089/cyber.2013.0305
27.
MoradiB.HuangY.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
28.
MorryM. M.StaskaS. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalisation, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269–279. doi:10.1037/h0087148
29.
MyersT.CrowtherJ. (2009). Social comparison as a predictor of body dissatisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 683–698. doi:10.1037/a0016763
30.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x
31.
O’BrienK. S.CaputiP.MintoR.PeoplesG.HooperC.KellS.SawleyE. (2009). Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: Development of scales and examination of predictive qualities. Body Image, 6, 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.03.003
32.
PeatC. M.MuehlenkampJ. J. (2011). Self-objectification, disordered eating, and depression: A test of meditational pathways. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 441–450. doi:10.1177/0361684311400389
33.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879
34.
PrichardI.TiggemannM. (2012). The effect of simultaneous exercise and exposure to thin-ideal music videos on women’s state self-objectification, mood and body satisfaction. Sex Roles, 67, 201–210. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0167-x
35.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0361684314554606
36.
SticeE. (2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 825–848. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.825
37.
StrelanP.HargreavesD. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification. Sex Roles, 52, 707–712. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3
38.
TiggemannM.McGillB. (2004). The role of social comparison in the effect of magazine advertisements on women’s mood and body dissatisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 23–44. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.1.23.26991
39.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2004). Thin ideals in music television: A source of social comparison and body dissatisfaction. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 48–58. doi:10.1002/eat.10214
40.
TiggemannM.SlaterA. (2013). NetGirls: The Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 46, 630–634. doi:10.1002/eat.22141
41.
TiggemannM.WilliamsE. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75. doi:10.1177/0361684311420250
42.
TylkaT. L.HillM. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2
43.
TylkaT. L.SabikN. J. (2010). Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem within objectification theory to predict women’s disordered eating. Sex Roles, 63, 18–31. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9785-3
44.
VandenboschL.EggermontS. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62, 869–887. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x
45.
WilsonR. E.GoslingS. D.GrahamL. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220. doi:10.1177/1745691612442904
46.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 928–942. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.928
47.
ZellE.AlickeM. D. (2009). Self-evaluative effect of temporal and social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 223–227. doi:10.1037/e514412014-055
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
