Research on body image has focused almost exclusively on heterosexual women and lesbians, leaving bisexual women’s experiences largely ignored. The present study sought to gain an understanding of psychosocial factors (including sexual prejudice, romantic relationship history, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender [LGBT] communities, and feminist identity) that may contribute to bisexual women’s experiences of body image. The authors conducted semistructured interviews with six bisexual women and used interpretative phenomenological analysis to analyze the results. This analysis resulted in four themes: bisexual women’s desire to accept their bodies in a context of societal objectification; the influence of dominant sexuality and gender binaries that leave bisexual women feeling invisible; the protective role of LGBT communities and feminist identification in helping them resist the thin ideal; and the positive and the negative influences of romantic relationships with men and women. Results highlight the importance of validating sexual identity and promoting feminist identification and inclusion within an LGBT community for bisexual women. Future research might further explore the role of feminist communities and romantic relationships in bisexual women’s body satisfaction and should include the experiences of bisexual women from diverse backgrounds. Editor's Note: Findings for the present study must be considered along with the discussion across the accompanying set of three reflection papers: Yost and Chmielewski (2013); Wilkinson and Kitzinger (2013); and Crawford (2013).
AustinS. B.ZiyadehN.KahnJ. A.CamargoC. A.ColditzG. A.FieldA. E. (2004). Sexual orientation, weight concerns, and eating-disordered behaviors in adolescent girls and boys. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1115–1123.
2.
BarkerC.PistrangN. (2005). Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: Implications for conducting and evaluating research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 201–212.
3.
BerenS. E.HaydenH. A.WilfleyD. E.GriloC. M. (1996). The influence of sexual orientation on body dissatisfaction in adult men and women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20, 135–141.
4.
BoehmerU.BowenD. J.BauerG. R. (2007). Overweight and obesity in sexual-minority women: Evidence from population-based data. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1134–1140.
5.
BrownL. (1987). Lesbians, weight and eating: New analyses and perspectives. In Lesbian psychologies: Explorations and challenges (pp. 294–309). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
6.
CoganJ. C. (1999). Lesbians walk the tightrope of beauty: Thin is in but femme is out. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3, 77–89.
7.
CrawfordM. (2013). Meaning-making and feminist practice. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 256–260
8.
9.
Del BussoL. (2007). Embodying feminist politics in the research interview: Material bodies and reflexivity. Feminism & Psychology, 17, 309–315.
10.
DiamondL. M. (2005). ‘I’m straight, but I kissed a girl’: The trouble with American media representations of female-female sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 104–110.
11.
DworkinS. H. (1989). Not in man’s image: Lesbians and cultural oppression of body image. Women and Therapy, 8, 27–39.
12.
EliasonM. J. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 317–326.
13.
FingerhutA. W.PeplauL. A.GhavamiN. (2005). A dual-identity framework for understanding lesbian experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 129–139.
14.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
15.
GassonS. (2004). Rigor in grounded theory research: An interpretive perspective on generating theory from qualitative field studies. In WhitmanM. E.WoszczynskiA. B. (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 79–102). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
16.
GiorgiA. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research method. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28, 235–261.
17.
GrippoK. P.HillM. S. (2008). Self-objectification, habitual body monitoring, and body dissatisfaction in older European American women: Exploring age and feminism as moderators. Body Image, 5, 173–182.
18.
GuestG.BunceA.JohnsonL. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.
19.
HainesM. E.ErchullM. J.LissM.TurnerD. L.NelsonJ. A.RamseyL. R.HurtM. M. (2008). Predictors and effects of self-objectification in lesbians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 181–187.
20.
HammidiT. N.KaiserS. B. (1999). Doing beauty: Negotiating lesbian looks in everyday life. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3, 55–63.
21.
HeilmanM. E.StopeckM. H. (1985). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 379–388.
22.
HerzogD. B.NewmanK. L.YehC.WarshawM. (1992). Body image satisfaction in homosexual and heterosexual women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 391–396.
23.
HusserlE. (1954). In The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. .(Original work published 1939)
24.
HuxleyC. J.ClarkeV.HalliwellE. (2011). “It’s a comparison thing, isn’t it?”: Lesbian and bisexual women’s accounts of how partner relationships shape their feelings about their body and appearance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 415–427.
25.
IgartuaK. J.GillK.MontoroR. (2003). Internalized homophobia: A factor in depression, anxiety, and suicide in the gay and lesbian population. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 22, 15–30.
26.
IsraelT.MohrJ. J. (2004). Attitudes toward bisexual women and men: Current research, future directions. Journal of Bisexuality, 4, 117–134.
27.
JeffersonD. L.StakeJ. E. (2009). Appearance self-attitudes of African American and European American women: Media comparisons and internalization of beauty ideals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 396–409.
28.
KellyL. (2007). Lesbian body image perceptions: The context of body silence. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 873–883.
29.
KlumpK. L.BurtS.SpanosA.McGueM.IaconoW. G.WadeT. D. (2010). Age differences in genetic and environmental influences on weight and shape concerns. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43, 679–688.
30.
KohA. S.RossL. K. (2006). Mental health issues: A comparison of lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual women. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 33–57.
31.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357.
32.
Le GallaisT. (2008). Wherever I go there I am: Reflections on reflexivity and the research stance. Reflective Practice, 9, 145–155.
33.
LehavotK.KingK. M.SimoniJ. M. (2011). Development and validation of a gender expression measure among sexual minority women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 381–400.
34.
LincolnY. S.GubaG. E. (1985). . In Naturalistic inquiryBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
LingelJ. (2009). Adjusting the borders: Bisexual passing and queer theory. Journal of Bisexuality, 9, 381–405.
36.
LudwigM. R.BrownellK. D. (1999). Lesbians, bisexual women, and body image: An investigation of gender roles and social group affiliation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 25, 89–97.
37.
LyonsE.CoyleA. (2007). . In (Eds.)Analyzing qualitative data in psychologyLondon, England: Sage.
38.
McKinleyN. M. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
39.
McLarenL.KuhD. (2004). Women’s body dissatisfaction, social class, and social mobility. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1575–1584.
40.
McLeanK. (2008). Inside, outside, nowhere: Bisexual men and women in the gay and lesbian community. Journal of Bisexuality, 8, 63–80.
41.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
42.
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G.SagerC. (2004). Does body satisfaction differ between gay men and lesbian women and heterosexual men and women? A meta-analytic review. Body Image, 1, 127–138.
43.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260.
44.
MulickP. S.WrightL. W.Jr. (2002). Examining the existence of biphobia in the heterosexual and homosexual populations. Journal of Bisexuality, 2, 45–64.
45.
MurnenS. K.SmolakL. (2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60, 186–197.
46.
MyersA.TaubJ.MorrisJ. F.RothblumE. D. (1998). Beauty mandates and the appearance obsession: Are lesbians better off?. In AtkinsD. (Ed.), Looking queer: Body image and identity in lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender communities (pp. 17–25). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
47.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.
48.
OwensL. K.HughesT. L.Owens-NicholsonD. (2003). The effects of sexual orientation on body image and attitudes about eating and weight. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7, 15–33.
PenningtonS. (2009). Bisexuals “doing gender” in romantic relationships. Journal of Bisexuality, 9, 33–69.
51.
PeplauL.FrederickD. A.YeeC.MaiselN.LeverJ.GhavamiN. (2009). Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 713–725.
52.
PetersonR. D.GrippoK. P.Tantleff-DunnS. (2008). Empowerment and powerlessness: A closer look at the relationship between feminism, body image and eating disturbance. Sex Roles, 58, 639–648.
53.
PitmanG. E. (2000). The influence of race, ethnicity, class, and sexual politics on lesbian’s body image. Journal of Homosexuality, 40, 49–64.
54.
PolimeniA. M.AustinS. B.KavanaghA. M. (2009). Sexual orientation and weight, body image, and weight control practices among young Australian women. Journal of Women’s Health, 18, 355–356.
55.
PonterottoJ. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 126–136.
56.
RodinJ.SilbersteinL. R.Striegel-MooreR. H. (1985). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In SondereggerT. B. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 267–307). Vol. 32, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
57.
RosarioM.SchrimshawE. W.HunterJ.Levy-WarrenA. (2009). The coming-out process of young lesbian and bisexual women: Are there butch/femme differences in sexual identity development?. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 34–49.
58.
RothblumE. D. (1994). Lesbians and physical appearance: Which model applies?. In GreenB.HerekG. M. (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 184–197). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
RubinL. R.NemeroffC. J.RussoN. (2004). Exploring feminist women’s body consciousness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 27–37.
60.
RustP. (2002). Bisexuality: The state of the union. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 180–240.
61.
SabikN. J.ColeE. R.WardL. (2010). Are all minority women equally buffered from negative body image? Intra-ethnic moderators of the buffering hypothesis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 139–151.
62.
ShareT. L.MintzL. B. (2002). Differences between lesbians and heterosexual women in disordered eating and related attitudes. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 89–106.
63.
SheffE. (2005). Polyamorous women, sexual subjectivity and power. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34, 251–283.
64.
SmithJ. A.EatoughV. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In LyonsE.CoyleA. (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (pp. 35–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SmithJ. A.FlowersP.LarkinM. (2009). . In Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and researchThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
SpragueJ.KobrynowiczD. (2006). A feminist epistemology. In SaltzmanJ. (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 78–97). New York, NY: Springer.
67.
TaubJ. (1999). Bisexual women and beauty norms: A qualitative examination. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 3, 27–36.
68.
TiggemannM.WilliamsE. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66–75. doi: 10.1177/0361684311420250
69.
WadeT. J.DiMariaC. (2003). Weight halo effects: Individual differences in perceived life success as a function of women’s race and weight. Sex Roles, 48, 461–465.
70.
WeinbergM. S.WilliamsC. J.PryorD. W. (1994). . In Dual attraction: Understanding bisexualityNew York, NY: Oxford University Press.
71.
WertzF. J. (2005). Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 167–177.
72.
WilkinsonS.KitzingerC. (2013). Representing our own experience: Issues in “insider” research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 251–255
73.
WolfN. (1991). In The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York, NY: William Morrow.
74.
YostM. R.ChmielewskiJ. F. (2011). Narrating rural lesbian lives: Body image and lesbian community in central Pennsylvania. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 15, 148–165. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2011.521097
75.
YostM. R.ChmielewskiJ. F. (2013). Blurring the lines between researcher and researched in interview studies: A feminist practice?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 242–250.
76.
YostM. R.McCarthyL. (2012). Girls gone wild? Heterosexual women’s same-sex encounters at college parties. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 7–24. doi: 10.1177/0361684311414818
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
