In two studies, we examined how romantic attachment style relates to women’s sexism toward men. Specifically, we applied structural equation modeling and mediation analyses to the responses of over 500 self-reported heterosexual women. Study 1 included 229 women who answered questionnaires tapping attachment anxiety and avoidance, ambivalent sexism toward men, romanticism, and interpersonal trust. We conducted Study 2 as a replication, changing questionnaire order to gauge the robustness of results, using a new sample of 273 women. In general, women’s attachment anxiety predicted ambivalent sexism (both benevolence and hostility) toward men, whereas women’s attachment avoidance predicted univalent hostility (and lower benevolence) toward men. Romanticism mediated attachment style’s relationship to benevolence toward men, whereas lower interpersonal trust mediated attachment’s relationship to hostility toward men. The results suggest that, for women (as for men), sexist attitudes toward members of the other sex have roots in attachment style and associated worldviews. Better understanding of women’s ambivalence toward men in romantic relationships may help to inform marital therapy.
AndersonK. J.KannerM.ElsayeghN. (2009). Are feminists man haters? Feminists’ and nonfeminists’ attitudes toward men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 216–224.
2.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
3.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
BrumbaughC. C.FraleyR. C. (2006). Transference and attachment: How do attachment patterns get carried forward from one relationship to the next?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 552–560.
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
6.
ChunK.CambellJ. B. (1974). Dimensionality of the Rotter interpersonal trust scale. Psychological Reports, 35, 1059–1070.
7.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.LePineJ. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.
8.
ConnellyK.HeesackerM. (2012). Why is benevolent sexism appealing?: Associations with system justification and life satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 432–443.
9.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press.
10.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
FeatherN. T. (2004). Value correlates of ambivalent attitudes toward gender relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 3–12.
12.
FeeneyB. C.CassidyJ.Ramos-MarcuseF. (2008). The generalization of attachment representations to new social situations: Predicting behavior during initial interactions with strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1481–1498.
13.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
14.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press.
15.
GlickP.LameirasM.FiskeS. T.EckesT.MasserB.VolpatoC.…WellsR. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728.
16.
GlickP.WhiteheadJ. (2010). Hostility toward men and the perceived stability of male dominance. Social Psychology, 41, 177–185.
17.
HartJ.HungJ. A.GlickP.DineroR. E. (2012). He loves her, he loves her not: Attachment style as a personality antecedent to men’s ambivalent sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1495–1505.
18.
HartJ.ShaverP. R.GoldenbergJ. L. (2005). Attachment, self-esteem, worldviews, and terror management: Evidence for a tripartite security system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 999–1013.
19.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
20.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.
21.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
22.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
23.
KruglanskiA. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LutzS. E.RubleD. N. (1995). Children and gender prejudice: Context, motivation, and the development of gender conceptions. Annals of Child Development, 10, 131–166.
25.
MikulincerM.GillathO.Sapir-LavidY.YaakobiE.AriasK.Tal-AloniL.…BorG. (2003). Attachment theory and concern for others’ welfare: Evidence that activation of the sense of secure base promotes endorsement of self-transcendence values. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 299–312.
26.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2001). Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 97–115.
27.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). New York, NY: Academic Press.
28.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
MontañésP.de LemusS.MoyaM.BohnerG.MegíasJ. L. (2013). How attractive are sexist intimates to adolescents? The influence of sexist beliefs and relationship experience. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 494–506.
30.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G.TanR. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271–290.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
33.
RotterJ. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.
34.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.
35.
SarletM.DumontM.DelacolletteN.DardenneB. (2012). Prescription of protective paternalism for men in romantic and work contexts. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 444–457.
36.
SibleyC. G.OverallN. C. (2011). A dual process motivational model of ambivalent sexism and gender differences in romantic partner preferences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 303–317.
37.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and ring-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172.
38.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39.
SimpsonJ. A.CollinsW. A.TranS.HaydonK. C. (2007). Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 355–367.
40.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.
41.
SprecherS.MettsS. (1989). Development of the ‘Romantic Beliefs Scale’ and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411.
42.
WeberC.FedericoC. M. (2007). Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology, 28, 289–416.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
