This study sought to advance a future-ready transportation engineering (TE) workforce by investigating emerging industry-wide challenges, essential skills, and opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration. To accomplish this, a national survey was conducted with seventy transportation engineers and managers, using open-ended questions to capture perspectives on pressing transportation challenges, critical TE workforce competencies, and the current and future integration of engineering and non-engineering disciplines. Thematic qualitative coding of survey responses was applied to identify and analyze trends. The findings underscore the importance of integrating traditional TE with fields such as computer science, big data analytics, social sciences, behavioral science, and public policy to more effectively consider human behavior, transportation system safety and resilience, and broader societal impacts. Although the need for greater interdisciplinary integration is increasingly recognized, institutional barriers and underrepresentation persist in both education and practice. To address these gaps, a two-pronged strategy is recommended: (1) embedding interdisciplinary coursework and projects within university TE curricula and (2) offering professional development opportunities that expose practitioners to emerging technologies and non-engineering perspectives. Future evidence-based research should focus on how integrating socio-technical approaches into TE education and practice can better prepare the workforce to tackle the complex challenges of a rapidly evolving industry.
HansmanR. J.MageeC.De NeufvilleR.RobinsR.RoosD.Research Agenda for an Integrated Approach to Infrastructure Planning, Design and Management. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Vol. 2, No. 2/3, 2006, p. 146. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2006.009434.
2.
PeruzziniM.WognumN.BilC.StjepandicJ.Special Issue on ‘Transdisciplinary Approaches to Digital Manufacturing for Industry 4.0.’International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2020, pp. 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2020.1752071.
3.
De WeckO. L.RoosD.MageeC. L.Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.
4.
SussmanJ. M.Educating the New Transportation Professional. ITS America, Perspectives on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 1995, pp. 89–99.
5.
SussmanJ. M. (ed.) The New Transportation Faculty: The Evolution to Engineering Systems. In Perspectives on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), Springer US, Boston, M.A., pp. 101–116.
6.
SussmanJ. M.PearceV.HicksB.CarterM.LappinJ. E.CaseyR.OrbanJ. E.McGurrinM.DeBlasioA. J.What Have We Learned about Intelligent Transportation Systems?US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2000.
7.
GiannakodakisG.Transport Planning: A Holistic Systems Approach. Road and Transport Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1994, pp. 4–20.
8.
PomoniM.LaiouA.PlatiC.YannisG.LoukeaM.BekiarisE.Future Trends in Transport Workforce Based on Demographic, Behavioural, Cultural and Socioeconomic Factors. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 48, 2020, pp. 2811–2820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.237.
9.
StockP.BurtonR. J. F.Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research. Sustainability, Vol. 3, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3081090.
10.
GrabowskiZ. J.MatslerA. M.ThielC.McPhillipsL.HumR.BradshawA.MillerT.RedmanC.Infrastructures as Socio-Eco-Technical Systems: Five Considerations for Interdisciplinary Dialogue. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2017, p. 02517002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000383.
11.
SavianoM.BarileS.SpohrerJ. C.CaputoF.A Service Research Contribution to the Global Challenge of Sustainability. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2017, pp. 951–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-10-2015-0228.
12.
FieldsN. L.MillerV. J.CronleyC.(Kate) HyunK.MattinglyS. P.KhademiS.NargesiS. R. R.WilliamsJ.Interprofessional Collaboration to Promote Transportation Equity for Environmental Justice Populations: A Mixed Methods Study of Civil Engineers, Transportation Planners, and Social Workers’ Perspectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 5, 2020, p. 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100110.
13.
ChangK. N.LutzB.BrownS.Workforce Development Needs and Objectives of Today’s Transportation Engineering Professionals. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674(9): 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120926995.
14.
HurwitzD. S.Sanford BernhardtK. L.TurochyR. E.YoungR. K.Transportation Engineering Curriculum: Analytic Review of the Literature. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 142, No. 3, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000275.
15.
WestM. E.CarrelA. L.KajfezR. L.Future Skill Requirements in Transportation Engineering and Implications for Graduate Curriculum Design. Journal of Civil Engineering Education, Vol. 147, No. 3, 2021, p. 04021002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000042.
16.
AhmadjianC.KnodlerM.FitzpatrickC.RyanA.BouchardC.Measuring the Effectiveness of Competency Models for Job-Specific Professional Development of Engineers & Engineering Technicians: A Comparison of Core Competencies Across Civil Engineering Positions of Department of Transportation Agencies Using Competency Models. The New England Transportation Consortium. Burlington, VT, 2018.
17.
O’BrienT.MatsumotoD.SanchezD.MaceC.WarrenE.HalaE.ReebT.Southern California Regional Workforce Development Needs Assessment for the Transportation and Supply Chain Industry Sectors. California State University Transportation Consortium. Long Beach, CA, 2020.
18.
SzymkowskiT.IveyS.Job Openings for Transportation System Management and Operations: Delivering TSMO Services. TR News, Vol. 323, 2019, pp. 32–36.
19.
LunguM.The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. American Journal of Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022, pp. 232–237. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/12085.
20.
ACEC Research Institute. Engineering Business Sentiment 2024 Q4. Washington D.C., 2024.
21.
ElwyA. R.MaguireE. M.KimB.WestG. S.Involving Stakeholders as Communication Partners in Research Dissemination Efforts. Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 37, No. S1, 2022, pp. 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07127-3.
22.
SladeE.KernP. A.KegebeinR. L.LiuC.ThompsonJ. C.KellyT. H.KingV. L.DiPaolaR. S.SurrattH. L.Collaborative Team Dynamics and Scholarly Outcomes of Multidisciplinary Research Teams: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2023, p. e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.9.
23.
UrtonD.MurrayD.Project Manager’s Perspectives on Enhancing Collaboration in Multidisciplinary Environmental Management Projects. Project Leadership and Society, Vol. 2, 2021, p. 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100008.
24.
CascettaE.HenkeI.The Seventh Transport Revolution and the New Challenges for Sustainable Mobility. Journal of Urban Mobility, Vol. 4, 2023, p. 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2023.100059.
25.
BiswasA.WangH.-C.Autonomous Vehicles Enabled by the Integration of IoT, Edge Intelligence, 5G, and Blockchain. Sensors, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2023, p. 1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23041963.
26.
FischerJ. M.Integrating Social Sustainability into Transportation Decision Making. Transportation Research Board, 2011, p. 18.
27.
TrainorJ. E.Murray-TuiteP.EdaraP.Fallah-FiniS.TriantisK.Interdisciplinary Approach to Evacuation Modeling. Natural Hazards Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2013, pp. 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000105.
28.
JirónP.LangeC.Comprender La Ciudad Desde Sus Habitantes. Relevancia de La Teoría de Prácticas Sociales Para Abordar La Movilidad. Cuestiones de sociología, Vol. 16, 1969, p. 030. https://doi.org/10.24215/23468904e030.
29.
ErshadA.YaziciA.WaltersJ. P.KalambayP.DanquahJ. O.FerdinandP.DillonH.KitaliA.Transportation Job Ads: Do They Align with the Sector’s Technology-Driven Transformation?Transportation Research Record.
30.
SarakkiV.LandS. M.An Ideal ITS Engineer – Where in the World Is This Person?ITS America, 1996, pp. 27–35. Washington D.C.
31.
DoumaF.Using ITS to Better Serve Diverse Populations. Transportation Research Board, 2004, p. 56.
32.
BarthM.Transferring ITS Research to the Real World. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2014, pp. 4–79.
33.
AbediK. A.CodjoeJ.ThapaR.A Nationwide Evaluation of the State of Practice of Performance Measurements for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Journal of Transportation Technologies, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2023, pp. 222–242. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2023.132011.
34.
GkritzaK.LabiS.SinhaK.Economic Development Effects of INDOT Transportation Projects. Joint Research Transportation Program, Purdue University, 2007.
35.
LaubeM. M.RainvilleL.LyonsW. M.A Multi-Modal Approach to Economic Development in the Metropolitan Area Transportation Planning Process. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Cambridge, MA, 2014.
36.
ForkenbrockD. J.Putting Transportation and Economic Development into Perspective. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Reseach Board, 1990. 1274: 3–11.
37.
JonesP.GedigA.LaFlammE.VacaP.KutaJ.ValdiviaM.A National Movement for Equitable Transit-Oriented Development Takes Root. Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, IL, 2025.
38.
LyonsW.PeckettH.MorseL.KhuranaM.NashL.Metropolitan Area Transportation Planning for Healthy Communities. John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation. Cambridge, MA, 2012.
39.
PoormanJ. P. A.Holistic Transportation Planning Framework for Management and Operation. ITE Journal, Vol. 75, No. 5, 2005, pp. 28–32.
40.
CohenT.StilgoeJ.StaresS.AkyelkenN.CavoliC.DayJ.DickinsonJ., et al. A Constructive Role for Social Science in the Development of Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 6, 2020, p. 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100133.
41.
LevinL.How May Public Transport Influence the Practice of Everyday Life among Younger and Older People and How May Their Practices Influence Public Transport?Social Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2019, p. 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030096.
42.
U.S. Department of Transportation. Promising Practices for Meaningful Public Involvement in Transportation Decision-Making. Washington, D.C., 2022.
43.
LitmanT.Evaluating Transportation Equity: Guidance for Incorporating Distributional Impacts in Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, B.C., 2025.
44.
WhillansA.SherlockJ.RobertsJ.O’FlahertyS.GavinL.DykstraH.DalyM.Nudging the Commute: Using Behaviorally Informed Interventions to Promote Sustainable Transportation. Behavioral Science & Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2021, pp. 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152100700204.
JosaI.AguadoA.Infrastructures and Society: From a Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 238, 2019, p. 117741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117741.
47.
LinovskiO.BakerD. M.Community-Designed Participation: Lessons for Equitable Engagement in Transportation Planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677(6): 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221145131.
48.
LianY.ZhangG.LeeJ.HuangH.Review on Big Data Applications in Safety Research of Intelligent Transportation Systems and Connected/Automated Vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 146, 2020, p. 105711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105711.
49.
Montoya-TorresJ. R.MorenoS.GuerreroW. J.MejíaG.Big Data Analytics and Intelligent Transportation Systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2021, pp. 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.06.025.
50.
JonesH.MouraF.DomingosT.Transport Infrastructure Project Evaluation Using Cost-Benefit Analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 111, 2014, pp. 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.073.
51.
SimkinsZ.MahjabeenR.Measuring the Transportation Workforce Skills Gap Using New Indices and Survey of Employers and Workers. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 56, 2017, pp.19–34. https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/jtrf.56.3.4447.
52.
WilliamsonD.FridleyK.A Survey of Credit Hour Requirements in BS Civil, Electrical, and Mechanical Engineering ABET Accredited Programs. American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.
53.
WestM.CarrelA.Investigating the Future of Transportation Engineering Education. IEEE, 2019.
