The study proposes a threshold value for selecting rut-resistant Marshall-designed bituminous mixtures. It also determines the correlation between 4-in. and 6-in. Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test (HWTT) samples. Samples of 4 in. and 4 in. diameter comprising different binder grades (VG-30, VG-40 and PMB-40) with varying air voids (2.5%, 4% and 7%) were tested using HWTT. The study emphasizes the stronger correlation (R = 0.99; R2 = 0.98) between 4-in. and 6-in. samples in HWTT results, providing useful information to pavement engineers. The test result also shows that polymer-modified mixtures have better rutting resistance because of their increased viscosity while higher compactive efforts improve resistance by minimizing air voids. Overall, this study underscores the role of performance testing and specification (rut depth = 6.5 mm at 20,000 passes for the Marshall mixtures) in ensuring the long-term performance and durability of pavements. These findings provide valuable guidance for engineers and researchers aiming to increase the performance of bituminous pavements through effective material selection and design strategies.
ZhengM.HanL.WangF.MiH.LiY.HeL.Comparison and Analysis on Heat Reflective Coating for Asphalt Pavement Based on Cooling Effect and Anti-Skid Performance. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 93, 2015, pp. 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.043.
2.
NahiM. H.KamaruddinI.NapiahM.Rutting Prediction in Asphalt Pavement Based on Viscoelastic Theory. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 78, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167801035.
3.
HaiderS. W.HarichandranR. S.Effect of Axle Load Spectrum Characteristics on Flexible Pavement Performance. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2095, No. 1, 2009, pp. 101–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2095-11.
HesamiS.RoshaniH.HamediG. H.AzarhooshA.Evaluate the Mechanism of the Effect of Hydrated Lime on Moisture Damage of Warm Mix Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47, 2013, pp. 935–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.079.
6.
ChakrobortyP.DasA.GhoshP.Determining Reliability of an Asphalt Mix Design: Case of Marshall Method. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 1, 2010, pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:1(31).
7.
HwangS.-D.YoonA.-S.KimB.-I.Improvement of Marshall Mix Design and Comparative Evaluation with Current Marshall Mix Design Method. Journal of the Korean Society of Road Engineers, Vol. 6, 2004, pp. 13–24.
8.
BarryM. K.An Analysis of Impact Factors on the Illinois Flexibility Index Test. Master’s Thesis. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 2016.
WestR.RodeznoC.LeivaF.YinF.Development of a Framework for Balanced Mix Design. Project NCHRP 20-07/Task 406. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, 2018, pp. 7–20.
11.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.RajV.SinghA.Data-Driven Predictive Models for Evaluating Optimum Binder Content and Volumetric Properties of Bituminous Mixtures Using Design Variables. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, Vol. 253, 2025, p. 117411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117411.
12.
SinghA.GuptaA.MiljkovićM.Intermediate- and High-Temperature Damage of Bitumen Modified by HDPE from Various Sources. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 24, No. S1, 2023, pp. 640–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2023.2181017.
13.
WaghV. P.GuptaA.Tribology-Based Specifications for Assessing the Production Temperatures of Asphalt Binder. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024. 2678: 966–978.
14.
WaghV. P.SabooN.GuptaA.Using Tribological Approach to Assess Production Temperatures of Asphalt Binders. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 419, 2024, p. 135513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135513.
15.
MoRTH Guidelines. Specifications for Road and Bridge Works for State Road Authorities, 5th Revision, Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2013, p. 448.
16.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.Laboratory-to-Field Correlation and Validation of Performance Specifications for Bituminous Mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 464, No. October2024, 2025, p. 140174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140174.
17.
Asphalt Institute. MS-2 7th Edition Asphalt Mix Design Methods. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY, 2009.
18.
ShaikhS.TiwariA.GuptaA.Understanding the Influence of Design Factors and Volumetrics on Moisture Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2024, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17760.
19.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.SabooN.Investigating Marshall Mix Performance Specifications Using Balanced Mix Design Methodology. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2679, No. 3, 2024, p. 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241275567.
20.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.SabooN.Investigations on Rutting Potential and Performance Specifications for Marshall Designed Bituminous Mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 26, 2024, pp. 2329–2351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2024.2441327.
21.
Indian Road Congress (IRC). IRC:111-2009 Specifications for Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes. Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, 2009.
22.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.SinghA.RajV.Investigating the Threshold Limits and Predictive Modeling Techniques for Indirect Tensile Strength of Marshall-Designed Mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 10, 2025, p. 04025342. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.
23.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.LokhandeV.Comparative Analysis of Different Surrogate Performance Tests for Evaluating the Rutting Potential of Marshall-Designed Bituminous Mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2025, p. 2520982. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2025.2520982.
24.
TsaiB. W.ColeriE.HarveyJ. T.MonismithC. L.Evaluation of AASHTO T 324 Hamburg-Wheel Track Device Test. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 114, 2016, pp. 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.171.
25.
MohammadL. N.ElseifiM.CaoW.RaghavendraA.YeM.Evaluation of Various Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Devices and AASHTO T 324 Specification for Rutting Testing of Asphalt Mixtures. Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, Vol. 86, 2017, pp. 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1389092.
26.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.SabooN.Investigating Marshall Mix Performance Specifications Using Balanced Mix Design Methodology. Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, 2024, p. 60.
27.
BrownE. R.BassettC. E.Effects of Maximum Aggregate Size on Rutting Potential and Other Properties of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1259, 1990, pp. 107–119.
28.
VamsikrishnaG.DangiJ.SinghD.Rutting and Cracking Performance of Asphalt Mixtures for 150 Mm and 100 Mm Diameter Samples Using Simple Performance Tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 10, 2024, p. 04024307. https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-17802.
29.
ShaikhS.GuptaA.Assessing Cracking Resistance and Threshold Limits of Bituminous Mixtures with IDEAL-CT and Predictive Modeling Techniques. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 449, 2024, p. 138349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138349.
30.
HabeebH.ChandraS.NashaatY.Estimation of Moisture Damage and Permanent Deformation in Asphalt Mixture from Aggregate Gradation. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-1356-7.
31.
SandraA. K.NallanaN. K.Investigations on Development of Early Distresses on Bituminous Pavement in India and Remedies. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic Engineering, Vol. 174, No. 2, 2021, pp. 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.20.00020.
32.
TashmanL.PearsonB.Characterisation of Stone Matrix Asphalt Mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2012, pp. 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.595793.
33.
LiuS.ZhuL.ZhangH.LiuT.JiP.CaoW.Effect of Gradation Variability on Volume Parameter and Key Performances of HMA. Frontiers in Materials, Vol. 7, 2021, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.611409.
