Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aims to establish a comprehensive mechanistic framework to refine the current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) specification of the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) test method at 250 pounds per square inch (psi) tire pressure and 250 lb wheel load, for different aircraft load levels and speeds. The criteria adjustments were based on airfield pavement mechanistic responses coupled with rutting performance models, developed from the repeated load triaxial (RLT) test conducted on airfield asphalt mixtures. The first step in the framework involved numerical modeling using 3D-Move to evaluate airfield pavement responses under different loading conditions. A sensitivity analysis was performed based on 3D-Move responses including three temperatures, three speeds, and five aircraft load levels. The state of stresses generated by 3D-Move was utilized to determine the range of deviatoric (σ _d ) and confining (σ _c ) stresses that covers different airfield loading conditions. Subsequently, the RLT test was performed under three selected sets of σ _d and σ _c . This effort aims to quantify the sensitivity of the calculated rut depth to speed, temperature, and gross aircraft weight using the laboratory-developed, mix-specific performance models. Based on the APA 250 psi/250 lb test thresholds refined from the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5370-10H, new test criteria were established for different rutting mechanical tests, including APA 100 psi/100 lb, the Hamburg Wheel Track Test, High Temperature Indirect Tensile Test, and Ideal Rutting Test. As a preliminary verification of the recommended criteria, field cores from airfield pavements with varying field rutting performance were evaluated using laboratory mechanical tests. The test data was then compared against the refined test thresholds to ensure that the proposed test criteria can effectively identify airfield mixtures with poor field performance in rutting.

Keywords

Asphalt mixtures balanced/performance engineered mixture design airfield pavement specifications asphalt mixture performance tests rutting mechanical tests permanent deformation and stability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rushing

J. F.

Little

D. N.

Garg

Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Used to Assess Rutting Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt Designed for High Tire Pressure Aircraft. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2296: 97–105.

Rushing

J. F.

Little

D. N.

Garg

Selecting a Rutting Performance Test for Airport Asphalt Mixture Design. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 15, Supplement 1, 2014, pp. 172–194.

Standard Specifications for Construction of Airports. AC 150/5370-10H. Federal Aviation Administration, AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards – Airport Engineering Division, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 2018.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 340, Standard Method of Test for Determining Rutting Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2023.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 324, Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2023.

Ulloa

Hajj

E. Y.

Sebaaly

P. E.

Mechanistic-Based Approach to Evaluate Rutting Susceptibility of Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures by Use of Dynamic Triaxial Testing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2373: 121–133.

Harvey

Zhou

Liu

Characterization of Permanent Deformation Using AMPT Repeated-Load-Triaxial and RSCH Tests for Mechanistic-Empirical Design and Practical Considerations. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 12, 2016, p. 04016169.

ASTM Standard D6931. Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Asphalt Mixtures. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6931-17.

ALDOT-458. High Temperature Indirect Tensile Test for HMA. Testing Manual, Bureau of Materials and Tests, Alabama DOT, Montgomery, AL, 2022.

10.

ASTM Standard D8360. Determination of Rutting Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Ideal Rutting Test. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1520/D8360-22.

11.

Zhou

Crockford

Zhang

Epps

Sun

Development and Validation of an Ideal Shear Rutting Test for Asphalt Mix Design and QC/QA. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 2019, pp. 719–750.

12.

Christensen

Bonaquist

Using the Indirect Tension Test to Evaluate Rut Resistance in Developing Hot-Mix Asphalt Mix Designs. Practical Approaches to Hot-Mix Asphalt Mix Design and Production Quality Control Testing, Transportation Research Circular E-C124, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.

13.

West

Rodezno

Leiva

Yin

Development of a Framework for Balanced Mix Design. Final Report to the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Project NCHRP 20-07/Task 406. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2018.

14.

Hajj

E. Y.

Hand

A. J. T.

Chkaiban

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Index-Based Tests for Performance Engineered Mixture Designs for Asphalt Pavements. Final Report to U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-HIF-19-103. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2019.

15.

Hajj

E. Y.

Aschenbrener

T. B.

Nener-Plante

Positive Practices, Lessons Learned, and Challenges When Implementing Balanced Design of Asphalt Mixtures: Site Visits. Final Report, WRSC-TR-22-11. Pavement Engineering & Science Program, University of Nevada, Reno, 2022.

16.

National Asphalt Pavement Association. Performance Test Resources. NAPA Website. https://www.asphaltpavement.org/expertise/engineering/resources/bmd-resource-guide/implementation-efforts. Accessed February 25, 2025.

17.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO T 378, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for Asphalt Mixtures Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2022.

18.

Hajj

E. Y.

Ulloa Calderon

A. E.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Sebaaly

P. E.

Characteristics of the Loading Pulse for the Flow Number Performance Test. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 79, 2010, pp. 253–294.

19.

Hajj

E. Y.

Ulloa Calderon

A. E.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Estimation of Stress Conditions for the Flow Number Simple Performance Test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2181: 67–78.

20.

ARA Inc. ERES Consultants’ Division. Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. NCHRP 1-37A. Final Report. Transportation Research Board; National Research Council: Washington, D.C., 2004.

21.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO R 84, Standard Practice for Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Asphalt Mixtures Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2021.

22.

Garg

Kazmee

Ricalde

Use of Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) in Airport Pavements. Proceedings of the RILEM International Symposium on Bituminous Materials, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 1909–1916.

23.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Yao

Sebaaly

P. E.

Pavement Strain from Moving Dynamic 3D Load Distribution. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 6, 1998, pp. 557–566.

24.

Hajj

E. Y.

Sebaaly

P. E.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Response of an Asphalt Pavement Mixture Under a Slow Moving Truck. In Asphalt Concrete: Simulation, Modeling, and Experimental Characterization ( Masad

Panoskaltsis

V. P.

Wang

, eds.), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2006, pp. 134–146.

25.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Krishnamenon

El-Mously

Sebaaly

P. E.

Validation of a Pavement Response Model Using Full-Scale Field Tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2002, pp. 85–93.

26.

Hajj

E. Y.

Sebaaly

P. E.

Kandiah

Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements (RAP) in Airfields HMA Pavements. Final Report Appendices for AAPTP 05-06. University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 2008.

27.

Elias

N. G.

Hajj

E. Y.

Bennert

Zhou

Epps

Hand

A. J. T.

Chan

K. M.

Rutting Mechanical Tests for Balanced Design of Airfield Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, In Press. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251346470.

28.

Schwartz

C. W.

Elkins

G. E.

Visintine

B. A.

Forman

Rada

G. R.

Groeger

Evaluation of Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTTP) Climatic Data for Use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Calibration and Other Pavement Analysis. Final Report to U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-HRT-15-019. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015.

29.

Federal Aviation Administration. Aeronautical Information Services. https://nfdc.faa.gov/nfdcApps/services/ajv5/airportDisplay.jsp?airportId=buf. Accessed September 15, 2024.

30.

Federal Aviation Administration. CY 2021 Enplanements at All Airports (Primary, Non-primary Commercial Service, and General Aviation). https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_allcargo_stats/passenger/cy21_all_enplanements. Accessed September 15, 2024.

31.

Airport Data and Information Portal. Search Facility Repository. https://adip.faa.gov/agis/public/#/airportSearch. Accessed September 15, 2024.

32.

U.S. Department of Transportation. LTTPBind Online. LTPP InfoPave Tools, Federal Highway Administration. https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/Tools/LTPPBindOnline. Accessed September 15, 2024.

33.

Advisory Circular for Airport Projects. AC No: 150/5300-13B.Airport Design. Federal Aviation Administration: Washington, D.C., 2024.

34.

Christensen

D. W.

Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program Project 04-02: PG Binder Grade Selection for Airfield Pavements. Revised Final Report. Advanced Asphalt Technologies, Sterling, VA, 2008.

35.

Traffic Flow Management System Counts. Airport View. https://aspm.faa.gov/tfms/sys/Airport.asp. Accessed September 15, 2024.

36.

Federal Aviation Administration. FAA Rigid and Flexible Iterative Elastic Layer Design Program (FAARFIELD). Version 2.0. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2021.

37.

Elias

N. G.

Advancing FAA Asphalt Mix Design: Evaluation of Rutting Mechanical Tests for Balanced Mix Design. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nevada, Reno, 2024.

38.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Krishnamenon

Sebaaly

P. E.

Finite-Layer Approach to Pavement Response Evaluation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000. 1709: 43–49.

39.

Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation. AC 150/5320-6G. Federal Aviation Administration, AAS-100, Office of Airport Safety & Standards – Airport Engineering Division, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., 2021.

40.

Federal Aviation Administration. NAPTF. https://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/NAPTF. Accessed September 15, 2024.

41.

Gonzalez

Lombaerts

Calculation and Analysis of the Rejected Takeoff Speed of a Commercial Airliner Under Various Environmental Conditions. Proc., 2023 Regional Student Conferences, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, VA, 2023, p. 71626.

42.

Daidzic

N. E.

Optimization of Takeoffs on Unbalanced Fields Using Takeoff Performance Tool. International Journal of Aviation Aeronautics and Aerospace, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2016.

43.

Hajj

E. Y.

Siddharthan

R. V.

Sebaaly

P. E.

Weitzel

Laboratory-Based Unified Permanent Deformation Model for Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2007, pp. 272–280.

44.

Epps

J. A.

Leahy

R. B.

Mitchell

Ashmore

Seeds

Alavi

Monismith

C. L.

WESTRACK: The Road to Performance-Related Specifications. Proc., World of Asphalt Pavements, International Conference, 1ST, 2000, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000.

45.

Ulloa Calderon

A. E

. Development of a Mechanistic-Based Approach to Evaluate Critical Conditions of Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nevada, Reno, 2013.

46.

Elias

N. G.

Hajj

E. Y.

Hand

A. J.

Zhou

Bennert

Decker

Patel

Developing Representative Test Specimen Conditions for Rutting Mechanical Test Methods of Airfield Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2025. 2679: 1127–1143.

Mechanistic-Empirical Framework for Development and Verification of Rutting Test Criteria for Flexible Airfield Pavements

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References