Low-carbon urban mobility (LCUM) is recognized globally as a pivotal strategy for mitigating climate change, and Thailand has integrated it prominently into its Climate Change Master Plan (CCMP) 2015–2050, particularly through Thailand’s goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. CCMP outlines three specific LCUM approaches and details corresponding measures under each approach, involving key ministries such as the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Interior, and the Ministry of Finance. However, there is a notable absence of guidance on inter-agency collaboration, resulting in nearly a decade of implementation marked by standalone, capital-intensive infrastructure projects, particularly urban rail expansions. Unfortunately, progress has been limited in supporting non-motorized and non-rail public transport options, or in reducing private car usage. These shortcomings stem partly from fragmented responsibilities and inadequate coordination among agencies. While local transport plans (LTPs) could potentially integrate these efforts, currently, no agency assumes responsibility for preparing LTPs. Therefore, this paper advocates for empowering local governments in Thailand to play a more significant role in local transportation planning and governance, aiming to enhance coordination and effectiveness in delivering LCUM climate actions.
HuizengaC.LeatherJ.Transport and Climate Policy in the Developing World – The Region That Matters Most. In Cars and Carbon: Automobiles and European Climate Policy in a Global Context (ZachariadisT. I., ed.), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2011, pp. 371–391.
PomlaktongN.OngkittikulS.Infrastructure Development in Thailand. In International Infrastructure Development in East Asia – Towards Balanced Regional Development and Integration (KumarN., ed.), ERIA Research Project Report, IDE-JETRO, Chiba, 2008, pp. 263–291.
DianaM.PirraM.A Comparative Assessment of Synthetic Indices to Measure Multimodality Behaviours. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol.12, No. 9, 2016, pp. 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2016.1177133.
8.
DochertyI.MarsdenG.AnableJ.The Governance of Smart Mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 115, 2018, pp. 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012.
ThondooM.MuellerN.Rojas-RuedaD.de VriesD.GuptaJ.NieuwenhuijsenM. J.Participatory Quantitative Health Impact Assessment of Urban Transport Planning: A Case Study from Eastern Africa. Environment International, Vol. 144, 2020, p. 106027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106027.
11.
PanthasenT.LambregtsB.S. K.LeopairojanaBangkok’s Bumpy Road to Sustainable Urban Mobility: Governance Challenges in the Promotion of Cycle-Friendliness. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, Vol. 20, 2021, p. 106. https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202120106.
PongruengkiatW.TippayawongK. Y.AggarangsiP.PichayapanP.KatongtungT.TippayawongN.Assessing Sustainability of Chiang Mai Urban Development. Discover Sustainability, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2023, P. 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00174-2.
14.
HullA.Integrated Transport Planning in the UK: From Concept to Reality. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2005, pp. 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.002.
15.
McTigueC.RyeT.MoniosJ.The Role of Reporting Mechanisms in Transport Policy Implementation by Local Authorities in England. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2018, pp. 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2017.12.002.
16.
McTigueC.RyeT.MoniosJ.Identifying Barriers to Implementation of Local Transport Policy – Lessons Learned from Case Studies on Bus Policy Implementation in Great Britain. Transport Policy, Vol. 91, 2020, pp. 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.002.
17.
Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and planning. Master Plan of Sustainable Transport (MPST) (2013-2022). Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning, Bangkok, pp. 1–29.
18.
RatanawarahaA.Institutional Issues in Integrating Land Use Planning and Water Management in Thailand. TDRI, Bangkok, 2016.
UNDP. Achieving Low Carbon Growth in Cities Through Sustainable Urban Systems Management in Thailand (LCC). The United Nations Development Programme, 2020.
21.
Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning. Chiang Mai Transportation System Development Master Plan 2017. Chiang Mai, Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning, Bangkok, 2017.
22.
Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning. Chiang Mai City Comprehensive Plan 2012, Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, Bangkok, pp. 1–99. https://download.asa.or.th/03media/04law/cpa/mr56-cm.pdf.
PCMLT. Summary Report of the Meeting of the Chiang Mai Provincial Subcommittee of Commission for the Management of Land Traffic (PCMLT), 2020-2023. https://www..go.th/managing/public/meeting_list/5.
29.
WalkerB. J. A.NeilW.Adger RusselD.Institutional Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation in Decentralised Governance Structures: Transport Planning in England. Urban Studies, Vol. 52, No. 12, 2015, pp. 2250–2266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014544759.
30.
JittrapiromP.JaensirisakS.A Review of Thailand’s Transport Master Plan for Regional Cities. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020, pp. 53–69. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.8.2_53.
