Against the backdrop of global advocacy for energy conservation and emission reduction, an understanding of the characteristics of vehicle carbon emissions can help to better formulate emission control strategies and lead the development of powertrain systems. This article reports on an investigation of the feasibility of carbon emission assessment based on both engine operating conditions and vehicle driving conditions. It was found that engine operating parameters can adapt well to CO2 emissions for fossil fuel powered vehicles. To modify a model of traditional vehicle specific power (VSP) correlated with CO2 emissions, two alternative parameters, VSP_air and VSP_fuel, have been proposed, which provide better prediction accuracy in linking tailpipe emissions to vehicle activities and engine operation parameters. Conversely, considering the complex geographical terrain of a city such as Chongqing, China, the correlation between VSP and vehicle carbon emissions rate will be significantly increased when the road gradient is coupled with the VSP formula. Moreover, the geospatial visualization of localized carbon emission during a real drive emission test was displayed based on a bubble map. As a result, the localized analysis of actual road carbon emissions of light vehicles based on the VSP method in this study facilitates the development of high-precision carbon accounting in traffic transportation.
SouzaC. D. R. d.SilvaS. D.SilvaM. A. V. d.D’AgostoM. d. A.BarbozaA. P.Inventory of Conventional Air Pollutants Emissions from Road Transportation for the State of Rio de Janeiro. Energy Policy, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.021.
2.
WangW.BieJ.YusufA.LiuY.WangX.WangC.Zheng ChenG., et al. A New Vehicle Specific Power Method Based on Internally Observable Variables: Application to CO2 Emission Assessment for a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 286, 2023, p 117050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117050.
3.
ParkJ.SeoJ.ParkS.Development of Vehicle Emission Rates Based on Vehicle-Specific Power and Velocity. The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 857, Part 3, 2023, p. 159622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159622.
4.
XuJ.DongY.YanM.A Model for Estimating Passenger-Car Carbon Emissions That Accounts for Uphill, Downhill and Flat Roads. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 12, No. 5, 2020, p. 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052028.
5.
EangC.SatoS.TanakaK.TangeT.ChenJ.Real World Emissions Analysis Using Sensor-Based Emissions Measurement System for Light-Duty Direct-Injection Gasoline Vehicle. SAE Technical Paper 2022-01-0572. SAE International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-0572.
6.
YaoZ.CaoH.CuiZ.WangY.HuangN.Research on Urban Distribution Routes Considering the Impact of Vehicle Speed on Carbon Emissions. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), Vol. 14, No. 23, 2022, p. 15827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315827.
7.
DongY.XuJ.NiJ.Carbon Emission Model of Vehicles Driving at Fluctuating Speed on Highway. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, Vol. 30, No. 7, 2023, pp. 18064–18077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23064-y.
8.
RakhaH.AhnK.TraniA.Development of VT-Micro Model for Estimating Hot Stabilized Light Duty Vehicle and Truck Emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2004, pp. 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(03)00054-3.
9.
KimW.KimC.LeeJ.KimJ.YunC.YookS.Fine Particle Emission Characteristics of a Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle According to Vehicle Acceleration and Road Grade. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 53, 2017, pp. 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.041.
10.
LuD.HeH.ZhaoH.LuK.PengZ.LiJ.Quantifying Traffic-Related Carbon Emissions on Elevated Roads Through On-Road Measurements. Environmental Research, Vol. 231, Part 2, 2023, p. 116200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116200.
11.
Jimenez-PalaciosJ. L.Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions with Vehicle Specific Power and TILDAS Remote Sensing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
12.
FreyH. C.ZhengX.HuJ.Variability in Measured Real-World Operational Energy Use and Emission Rates of a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Energies, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2020, p. 1140. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13051140.
13.
DuarteG. O.VarellaR. A.GonçalvesG. A.FariasT. L.Effect of Battery State of Charge on Fuel Use and Pollutant Emissions of a Full Hybrid Electric Light Duty Vehicle. Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 246, 2014, pp. 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.103.
14.
ChongH. S.ParkY.KwonS.HongY.Analysis of Real Driving Gaseous Emissions from Light-Duty Diesel Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 65, 2018, pp. 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.015.
15.
FrancoV.KousoulidouM.MunteanM.NtziachristosL.HausbergerS.DilaraP.Road Vehicle Emission Factors Development: A Review. Atmospheric Environment (1994), Vol. 70, 2013, pp. 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.01.006.
16.
VouitsisI.NtziachristosL.SamarasC.SamarasZ.Particulate Mass and Number Emission Factors for Road Vehicles Based on Literature Data and Relevant Gap Filling Methods. Atmospheric Environment (1994), Vol. 168, 2017, pp. 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.010.
17.
ZhouG.ChungW.ZhangX.A Study of Carbon Dioxide Emissions Performance of China’s Transport Sector. Energy (Oxford), Vol. 50, No. 1, 2013, pp. 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.11.045.
18.
SongG.LeiY.Characteristics of Low-Speed Vehicle-Specific Power Distributions on Urban Restricted-Access Roadways in Beijing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2233: 90–98.
19.
WuY.YangZ.LinB.LiuH.WangR.ZhouB.HaoJ.Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission Impacts of Vehicle Electrification in Three Developed Regions of China. Energy Policy, Vol. 48, 2012, pp. 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.060.
20.
ZhaiH.Christopher FreyH.RouphailN. M.Development of a Modal Emissions Model for a Hybrid Electric Vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 6, 2011, pp. 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.001.
21.
KoM.LordD.ZietsmanJ.Environmentally Conscious Highway Design for Crest Vertical Curves. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2270: 96–106.
22.
MaY.LauA. K. H.LouieP. K. K.LiT.LuanS.Application of Vehicular Emission Models and Comparison of Their Adaptability. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2008, pp. 308–316. http://respository.ust.hk/ir/Record/1783.1-21135
23.
LouliziA.RakhaH.BichiouY.Quantifying Grade Effects on Vehicle Fuel Consumption for Use in Sustainable Highway Design. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2018, pp. 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1385878.
24.
DemirE.BektaT.LaporteG.A Comparative Analysis of Several Vehicle Emission Models for Road Freight Transportation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2011, pp. 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.011.
25.
ZhangL.ChenF.MaX.PanX.Fuel Economy in Truck Platooning: A Literature Overview and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2604012.
26.
BoriboonsomsinK.BarthM.Impacts of Road Grade on Fuel Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions Evidenced by Use of Advanced Navigation Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2139: 21–30.
27.
ParkS.RakhaH.Energy and Environmental Impacts of Roadway Grades. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1987: 148–160.
28.
DongY.XuJ.GuC.Modelling Carbon Emissions of Diesel Trucks on Longitudinal Slope Sections in China. PLoS One, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2020, p. e0234789. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234789.
29.
KangM.ShariatS.JhaM. K.New Highway Geometric Design Methods for Minimizing Vehicular Fuel Consumption and Improving Safety. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 31, 2013, pp. 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.03.002.
EhsaniM.AhmadiA.FadaiD.Modeling of Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Road Transport. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 53, 2016, pp. 1638–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.062.
32.
BarthM.YoungloveT.ScoraG.Development of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Modal Emissions and Fuel Consumption Model. In California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH). Technical Report. UC Berkeley, CA, 2005.
33.
ScoraG.BarthM.Comprehensive Modal Emission Model (CMEM), Version 3.01: User’s Guide. Technical Report. University of California, Oakland, 2006.
34.
RobinsonM. K.HolménB. A.Hybrid-Electric Passenger Car Energy Utilization and Emissions: Relationships for Real-World Driving Conditions That Account for Road Grade. The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 738, 2020, p. 139692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139692.
35.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methodology for Developing Modal Emission Rates for EPA’s Multi-Scale Motor Vehicle and Equipment Emission System. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, MI, 2002.
