Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Sustainability in distribution networks is currently the focus of study at institutional, academic, and commercial levels. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is on all the programmatic agendas, and the goals are clear for years toward carbon neutrality. As one of the main polluting sectors and growing trends with e-commerce, transport must align its efforts to contribute to the cause. In this paper, a strategic model is proposed for the calculation of CO₂ emissions in the distribution of parcels. Novel in this research is that it integrates both line-haul transport and last-mile distribution at a strategic level and includes key elements such as time windows and population density in the calculation. Through an applied case in parcel distribution in Belgium, the calculation of CO₂ emissions with the proposed model is illustrated. The model is enhanced by analyzing the time windows effect and the electrification of the last-mile fleet. The results concerning CO₂ emissions in parcel distribution in Belgium show that it is possible to reduce emissions not only through the electrification of the fleet but also with an efficient distribution network. The effect of the network structure will be more evident with international shipments that include more polluting modes of transport. However, the results for Belgium show that the last mile is currently the most polluting segment. The proposed model could further be complemented by including reverse logistics, in-house calculation, and packaging emissions.

Keywords

sustainability and resilience transportation and sustainability air quality and greenhouse gas mitigation emissions modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

European Commission. European Green Deal Communication. 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0556

EPA. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions | US EPA. 2020. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions. Accessed July 13, 2022.

IEA. CO2 Emissions by Sector, World 1990-2019. 2019. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-browser?country=WORLD&fuel=CO2 emissions&indicator=CO2BySector. Accessed July 13, 2022.

IEA. Cars, Planes, Trains: Where do CO₂ Emissions from Transport Come from? Our World in Data. 2020. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport. Accessed July 13, 2022.

European Parliament. CO₂ Emissions from Cars: Facts and Figures (Infographics). News - European Parliament. 2019. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20190313STO31218/co2-emissions-from-cars-facts-and-figures-infographics. Accessed July 13, 2022.

ICAO. ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator. https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Carbonoffset/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed July 13, 2022.

Guo

Allaoui

Boulaksil

A Distributed Approximation Approach for Solving the Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design Problem. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 57, No. 11, 2019, pp. 3695–3718. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1556412.

Gong

D.-C.

Chen

P.-S.

T.-Y.

Multi-Objective Optimization of Green Supply Chain Network Designs for Transportation Mode Selection. Scientia Iranica, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2017, pp. 3355–3370. https://doi.org/10.24200/SCI.2017.4403.

Yang

Chang

Carbon Footprint Based Green Supplier Selection Under Dynamic Environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 170, 2018, pp. 880–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.09.165.

10.

Jerbi

Jribi

Aljuaid

A. M.

Hachicha

Masmoudi

Design of Supply Chain Transportation Pooling Strategy for Reducing CO₂ Emissions Using a Simulation-Based Methodology: A Case Study. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2022, p. 2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14042331/S1.

11.

Klein

Wolf

Schulz

Weber-Blaschke

Environmental Impacts of Various Biomass Supply Chains for the Provision of Raw Wood in Bavaria, Germany, with Focus on Climate Change. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 539, 2016, pp. 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.08.087.

12.

Nurul

H. R.

Haslenda

Yunus

N. A.

Klemeš

J. J.

Integrated GIS-AHP Optimization for Bioethanol from Oil Palm Biomass Supply Chain Network Design. Chemical Engineering Transactions, Vol. 83, 2021, pp. 571–576. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2183096.

13.

Lozano-Moreno

J. A.

Maréchal

Biomass Logistics and Environmental Impact Modelling for Sugar-Ethanol Production. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 210, 2019, pp. 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.10.310.

14.

Mubarak

Zainal

Development of a Framework for the Calculation of CO2 Emissions in Transport and Logistics in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Technology, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2018, pp. 787–796. https://doi.org/10.14716/IJTECH.V9I4.1432.

15.

Mubarak

Rahman

A Comparative Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Transportation and Logistics of the Consumer Goods Industry in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Technology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2020, pp. 333–341. https://doi.org/10.14716/IJTECH.V11I2.3466.

16.

Edwards

J. B.

McKinnon

A. C.

Cullinane

S. L.

Comparative Analysis of the Carbon Footprints of Conventional and Online Retailing: A ‘Last Mile’ Perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 40, No. 1–2, 2010, pp. 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011018055/FULL/XML.

17.

Tsakalidis

Krause

Julea

Peduzzi

Pisoni

Thiel

Electric Light Commercial Vehicles: Are they the Sleeping Giant of Electromobility?

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 86, 2020, p. 102421. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2020.102421.

18.

Woody

Craig

M. T.

Vaishnav

P. T.

Lewis

G. M.

Keoleian

G. A.

Optimizing Future Cost and Emissions of Electric Delivery Vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2022, pp. 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.13263.

19.

Davydenko

Ehrler

de Ree

Lewis

Tavasszy

Towards a Global CO₂ Calculation Standard for Supply Chains: Suggestions for Methodological Improvements. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 32, 2014, pp. 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2014.08.023.

20.

Davydenko

Hopman

van Gijlswijk

R. N.

Rondaij

Spreen

J. S.

Towards Harmonization of Carbon Footprinting Methodologies. 2019. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6bbcdab9-abb3-4c12-9a04-ec4c61f80642. Accessed July 14, 2022.

21.

Wild

Recommendations for a Future Global CO₂-Calculation Standard for Transport and Logistics. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 100, 2021, p. 103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2021.103024.

22.

CLECAT. Calculating GHG Emissions for Freight Forwarding and Logistics Services. European Association for Forwarding, Transport, Logistics and Customs Services (CLECAT), Brussels, Belgium, 2012.

23.

Konečný

Petro

Calculation of Selected Emissions from Transport Services in Road Public Transport. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 134, 2017, p. 00026. https://doi.org/10.1051/MATECCONF/201713400026.

24.

Mckinnon

Piecyk

Measuring and Managing CO2 Emissions of European Chemical Transport. 2011. www.cefic.org. Accessed July 13, 2022.

25.

Greenhouse Gas Protocol. The GHG Emissions Calculation Tool. 2014. https://ghgprotocol.org/ghg-emissions-calculation-tool. Accessed July 15, 2022.

26.

Green Logistics. Green Logistics Method for the Ecological Assessment of Logistics Service Providers. 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280736205_Green_Logistics_method_for_the_ecological_assessment_of_logistics_service_providers_Calculation_of_emissions_step_2_and_validation_of_scope. Accessed July 18, 2022.

27.

Smart Freight Centre. Global Logistics Emissions Council Framework for Logistics Emissions Accounting and Reporting. 2019. https://www.feport.eu/images/downloads/glec-framework-20.pdf

28.

Lean & Green. Optimalisatie Transportplanning - Lean & Green. https://www.lean-green.nl/maatregelen/optimalisatie-transportplanning/. Accessed July 15, 2022.

29.

CE Delft. STREAM Freight Transport - Emissions of Freight Transport Modes. 2016. www.cedelft.eu. Accessed July 14, 2022.

30.

Ministry of Ecological and Solidary Transition. GHG Information for Transport Services. 2019. www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr. Accessed July 14, 2022.

31.

European Commission. Vehicle Energy Consumption Calculation TOol – VECTO. 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/transport-emissions/road-transport-reducing-co2-emissions-vehicles/vehicle-energy-consumption-calculation-tool-vecto_en. Accessed July 11, 2022.

32.

EcoTransIT. Ecological Transport Information Tool for Worldwide Transports. 2019. https://ecotransit.org/methodology.en.html. Accessed July 15, 2022.

33.

BigMile. BigMile Carbon Analytics – The Standard in CO2 Footprint Calculation and Optimization. https://bigmile.eu/bigmile-carbon-analytics/. Accessed July 14, 2022.

34.

CarbonCare. Methodology Adopted to Compute CO₂ and Other Greenhouse Gases Emissions by Cabon-Care. https://www.carboncare.org/en/co2-emissions-calculator/co2-calculator-methodology.html. Accessed July 18, 2022.

35.

UPU. OSCAR. Universal Postal Union. 2020. https://www.upu.int/en/Postal-Solutions/Technical-Solutions/Products/OSCAR. Accessed July 15, 2022.

36.

DHL. Carbon Calculator. 2022. https://www.dhl-carboncalculator.com/#/home. Accessed July 18, 2022.

37.

Laporte

Nobert

Exact Algorithms for the Vehicle Routing Problem. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, Vol. 132, No. C, 1987, pp. 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73235-3.

38.

Davydenko

Smokers

R. T. M.

Hopman

W. M. M.

Wagter

Great Circle Distance as the Optimal Distance Metric for CO2 Allocation in Freight Transport. TNO Publications. 2021. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:6e3d257c-ab6e-4f55-b254-ddc6ea33ce71. Accessed July 18, 2022.

39.

Beardwood

Halton

J. H.

Hammersley

J. M.

The Shortest Path Through Many Points. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 55, No. 4, 1959, pp. 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100034095.

40.

Daganzo

C. F.

The Distance Traveled to Visit N Points with a Maximum of C Stops per Vehicle: An Analytic Model and an Application. Transportation Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1984, pp. 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.18.4.331.

41.

Cárdenas

Beckers

Vanelslander

E-Commerce Last-Mile in Belgium: Developing an External Cost Delivery Index. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 24, 2017, pp. 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.07.006.

42.

Pina-Pardo

J. C.

Moreno

Barros

Faria

Winkenbach

Janjevic

Design of a Two-Echelon Last-Mile Delivery Model. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Vol. 11, 2022, p. 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJTL.2022.100079.

43.

Winkenbach

Roset

Spinler

Strategic Redesign of Urban Mail and Parcel Networks at La Poste. Interfaces, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2016, pp. 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1287/INTE.2016.0854.

44.

Bergmann

F. M.

Wagner

S. M.

Winkenbach

Integrating First-Mile Pickup and Last-Mile Delivery on Shared Vehicle Routes for Efficient Urban E-Commerce Distribution. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 131, 2020, pp. 26–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRB.2019.09.013.

45.

Cardenas

I. D.

Dewulf

Vanelslander

Smet

Beckers

The E-Commerce Parcel Delivery Market and the Implications of Home B2C Deliveries vs Pick-up Points. International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2017, pp. 235–256. https://doi.org/10.19272/201706702004.

46.

Gevaers

Van de Voorde

Vanelslander

Cost Modelling and Simulation of Last-Mile Characteristics in an Innovative B2C Supply Chain Environment with Implications on Urban Areas and Cities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 125, 2014, pp. 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1483.

47.

Ecommerce Europe. European E-Commerce Report 2022. 2022. www.ecommerce-europe.eu. Accessed July 9, 2022.

48.

Beckers

Weekx

Beutels

Verhetsel

COVID-19 and Retail: The Catalyst for E-Commerce in Belgium?

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 62, 2021, p. 102645. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2021.102645.

49.

BIPT. Market Share Based on Volume within the Segment of Parcel and Express Mail Items. 2021. https://www.bipt.be/operators/market-share-based-on-the-volume-within-the-segment-of-parcel-and-express-mail-items. Accessed July 9, 2022.

50.

MIT Real State Innovation Lab. Retail Carbon Footprints: Measuring Impacts from Real Estate and Technology. 2021. https://realestateinnovationlab.mit.edu/research_article/retail-carbon-footprints-measuring-impacts-from-real-estate-and-technology/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Strategic Multi-Echelon and Cross-Modal CO 2 Emissions Calculation in Parcel Distribution Networks: First Step Toward a Common Language

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material