To enhance driving safety and comfort, this study aims to investigate the level of driving risk under different road conditions in urban areas. The you only look once version five-deep simple online and real time tracking (YOLOv5-DeepSORT) model is employed to collect traffic data of forward vehicles, and novel methodologies are proposed to calculate the relative orientation, distance, and velocity between the forward vehicles and the main vehicle. Additionally, this study introduces an innovative function to determine the proximity of the forward vehicles to the main vehicle’s lane, along with a straightforward model for vehicle lane change recognition. By utilizing the relative orientation, distance, and velocity between forward vehicles and the main vehicle, information on forward vehicles’ lane changes, and the main vehicle’s velocity as inputs, an urban road driving risk identification model based on Mamdani fuzzy inference is constructed. The model was validated with real vehicle experiments that were conducted under various road conditions in the city of Zhenjiang. The results demonstrate that the proposed driving risk identification model achieves an impressive accuracy rate of 92.44% and exhibits good identification performance.
GeH. M.ZhengM. Q.LyuN. C.LuY.SunH.Review on Driving Distraction. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol.. 21, No, 2, 2021, pp. 38–55.
2.
GeH. M.BoY. Y.SunH.ZhengM. Q.LuY.A Review of Research on Driving Distraction Based on Bibliometrics and Co-occurrence: Focus on Driving Distraction Recognition Methods. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 82, 2022, pp. 261–274.
3.
WangX. S.SunP.ZhangX. C.ZhangK.Highway Following Model Parameter Calibration Based on Natural Driving Data. China Journal of Highway and Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2020, pp. 132–142.
4.
WangC.SunQ.LiZ.ZhangH.RuanK.Cognitive Competence Improvement for Autonomous Vehicles: A Lane Change Identification Model for Distant Preceding Vehicles. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 83229–83242.
5.
XuT.WenC. L.ZhangX.LiB. W.WangJ.Urban Road Lane Change Behavior Recognition Based on GMM-CHMM. Transportation Systems Engineering and Information, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2020, pp. 61–67.
6.
ChenL.FengY. C.LiQ. R.Research on Vehicle Lane Change Behavior Recognition Model Based on Multi-class SVM. Journal of Safety and Environment, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2019, pp. 193–199.
7.
JiX. W.FeiC.HeX. K.LiuY.LiuY.Driving Intention Recognition and Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Based on LSTM Network. China Journal of Highway and Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2019, pp. 34–42.
8.
ZhangH.ZhangM.ZhangC.HouL.Formulating a GIS-Based Geometric Design Quality Assessment Model for Mountain Highways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 157, No. 12, 2021, p. 106172.
9.
LiangB.WongY. D.HeS.QinCWenS.Dynamic Traffic Safety Risk Assessment in Road Tunnel Entrance Zone Based on Drivers’ Psychophysiological Perception States: Methodology and Case-Study Insights. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 147, 2024, p. 105677.
EveringhamM.EslamiS. M. A.Van GoolL.WilliamsC. K. I.WinnJ.ZissermanA.The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge: A Retrospective. International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 111, No. 1, 2010, pp. 98–136.
12.
WojkeN.BewleyA.PaulusD.Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric. Proc., 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Beijing, China, IEEE, New York, 2017, pp. 3645–3649.
13.
LiuX.LiuW.MeiT.MaH.Provid: Progressive and Multimodal Vehicle Reidentification for Large-Scale Urban Surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2017, pp. 645–658.
14.
GeigerA.LenzP.LenzR.Are We Ready for Autonomous Driving? The KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite. Proc., IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, RI, IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 3354–3361.
15.
BernardinK.StiefelhagenR.Evaluating Multiple Object Tracking Performance: The Clear MOT Metrics. Journal on Image and Video Processing, Vol. 2008, 2008, pp. 1–10.
16.
MarzouguiM.AlasiryA.KortliY.BailiJ.A Lane Tracking Method Based on Progressive Probabilistic Hough Transform. IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 84893–84905.
17.
SeyediM. R.KoloushaniM. R.JungS.VanliA.Safety Assessment and a Parametric Study of Forward Collision-Avoidance Assist Based on Real-World Crash Simulations. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 11, 2021, pp. 16–24.
18.
LiuH.YuanJ.ZhengY.Computer Vision Algorithms and Intelligent Vehicle Applications. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, 2015, pp. 54–66.
LinC. T.KingJ. T.SinghA. K.GuptaA.MaZ.LinJ. W.MachadoA. M. C.AppajiA.PrasadM.Voice Navigation Effects on Real-World Lane Change Driving Analysis Using an Electroencephalogram. IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 2018, pp. 26483–26492.
21.
LaurikkalaJ.JuholaM.KentalaE.Informal Identification of Outliers in Medical Data. Proc., of the Fifth International Workshop on Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology, Berlin, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2000, pp. 20–24.
22.
WangK.LuJ.JiangY.Construction of Road Bad Driving Behavior Spectrum and Calculation Method of Characteristic Values Based on Vehicle Driving Trajectory. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2020, pp. 236–249.
23.
YaoZ.Research on Vehicle Velocity Continuity Distribution and Visualization of Urban Road Based on Multi-Source Traffic Big Data. Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2019.
24.
LeeY. I.KimS. G.KimY. G.Fuzzy Relational Product for Collision Avoidance of Autonomous Ships. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2015, pp. 21–38.
25.
LiP. H.HuM. X.ZhangW. H.ZhangY. B.Effects of Distraction on Drivers’ Response Time to Traffic Conflict. China Journal of Highway and Transportation, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2018, pp. 36–42.
26.
SongkrohA.FooprateepsiriR.LilakiataskunW.An Intelligent Risk Detection from Driving Behavior Based on BPNN and Fuzzy Logic Combination. Proc., 2014 IEEE/ACIS 13th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), Taiyuan, China, IEEE, New York, 2014, pp. 105–110.
27.
MaY.XieZ.ChenS.WuY.QiaoF.Real-Time Driving Behavior Identification Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2021, p. 348.
28.
GuoY.ZhangH.WangC.SunQ.LiW.Driver Lane Change Intention Recognition in the Connected Environment. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 575, 2021, p. 126057.
29.
FengX.LingX.ZhengH.ChenZ.XuY.Adaptive Multi-Kernel SVM with Spatial-Temporal Correlation for Short-Term Traffic Flow Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2018, pp. 2001–2013.
30.
KarriS. L.De SilvaL. C.LaiD. T. C.YongS. Y.Classification and Prediction of Driving Behavior at a Traffic Intersection Using SVM and KNN. Computer Science, Vol. 2, 2021, pp. 1–11.
