Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the needs of mobility device users (MDUs) to pursue accessible airline travel at every stage of the journey, from trip planning to departure to arrival at the destination airport. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with MDUs (n = 13) and their caregivers (n = 7). Descriptive statistics were used for demographic information, and a qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the transcribed interviews and extract themes. Three overarching themes were identified: service, accessibility, and safety. Sub-themes related to service encompassed booking concerns, disconnected services, untrained airport staff, and damaged mobility devices. Accessibility sub-themes included the in-cabin aisle, in-cabin toilet, and airport infrastructure. Safety sub-themes encompassed aisle chairs and passenger seats. This study has uncovered challenges, particularly in relation to booking concerns, disconnected services, untrained airport staff, and airport infrastructure. To address these challenges, potential solutions are suggested, including staff education, installation of in-cabin accessible toilets and versatile seats, modification of wheelchairs and aisle chairs, and improvements to accessible airport infrastructure. We anticipate that the findings will provide insights into the redesign of aircraft, airports, wheelchairs, and aisle chairs as well as inform the development of legislation and guidelines.

Keywords

disability equity journey apmping qualitative research user need

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Full Year 2022 U.S. Airline Traffic Data. United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.https://www.bts.gov/newsroom/full-year-2022-us-airline-traffic-data. Accessed December 19, 2023.

U.S. Department of Transportation. Airline Passengers with Disabilities Bill of Rights. United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.https://www.transportation.gov/airconsumer/disabilitybillofrights. Accessed December 19, 2023.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disability Impacts All of Us. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Washington, D.C.https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/infographic-disability-impacts-all.html. Accessed December 19, 2023.

Kaye

H. S.

Kang

LaPlante

M. P.

Mobility Device Use in the United States. Disability Statistics Report. National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 2000.

Davies

Christie

An Exploratory Study of the Experiences of Wheelchair Users as Aircraft Passengers–Implications for Policy and Practice. IATSS Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2017, pp. 89–93.

Darcy

Flying with Impairments: Improving Airline Practices by Understanding the Experiences of People with Disabilities. Travel and Tourism Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally, Vol. 47, 2016, pp. 61–70.

Poria

Reichel

Brandt

The Flight Experiences of People with Disabilities: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2010, pp. 216–227.

Chang

Y.-C.

Chen

C.-F.

Meeting the Needs of Disabled Air Passengers: Factors That Facilitate Help from Airlines and Airports. Tourism Management, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2012, pp. 529–536.

National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Technical Feasibility of a Wheelchair Securement Concept for Airline Travel: A Preliminary Assessment. Transportation Research Board. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2021.

10.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Dickinson

W. B.

Leech

N. L.

Zoran

A. G.

A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2009, pp. 1–21.

11.

Plummer

Focus Group Methodology. Part 1: Design Considerations. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2017, pp. 297–301.

12.

Sivakanthan

Cooper

Lopes

Kulich

Deepak

Lee

C. D.

Wang

, et al. Accessible Autonomous Transportation and Services: A Focus Group Study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2024, pp. 1992–1999.

13.

Plummer

Focus Group Methodology. Part 2: Considerations for Analysis. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 8, 2017, pp. 345–351.

14.

Ando

Cousins

Young

Achieving Saturation in Thematic Analysis: Development and Refinement of a Codebook. Comprehensive Psychology, Vol. 3, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.3.4.

15.

Bertaux

From the Life-History Approach to the Transformation of Sociological Practice. In Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences ( Bertaux

, ed.), Sage, London, 1981, pp. 29–45.

16.

Guest

Bunce

Johnson

How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2006, pp. 59–82.

17.

Howard

Journey Mapping: A Brief Overview. Communication Design Quarterly Review, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2014, pp. 10–13.

18.

Lee

C. D.

Koontz

A. M.

Cooper

Sivakanthan

Chernicoff

Brunswick

Deepak

, et al. Understanding Travel Considerations and Barriers for People with Disabilities to Using Current Mode of Transportation Through Journey Mapping. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2024. 2678: 271–287.

19.

Hsieh

H.-F.

Shannon

S. E.

Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2005, pp. 1277–1288.

20.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. Aviation Consumer Protection: Few U.S. Aircraft Have Lavatories Designed to Accommodate Passengers with Reduced Mobility. United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C., 2020.

21.

U.S. Department of Transportation. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel: Draft Technical Assistance Manual (14 CFR Part 382). Federal Register, Washington, D.C., 2012.

22.

U.S. Architectural, and U.S. Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for Transportation Vehicles; Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Washington, D.C., 2010.

23.

U.S. Department of Transportation. ACCESS Advisory Committee. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.https://www.transportation.gov/access-advisory-committee. Accessed December 29, 2023.

24.

U.S. Department of Justice. 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 2010.

25.

Federal Aviation Administration. Advisory Circular 25-17A—Transport Airplane Cabin Interiors Crashworthiness Handbook. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2009.

26.

LaPlante

M. P.

Kaye

H. S.

Demographics and Trends in Wheeled Mobility Equipment Use and Accessibility in the Community. Assistive Technology^®, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2010, pp. 3–17.

27.

Woo

Cui

Kim

Choi

Gender Differences in Caregiver Attitudes and Unmet Needs for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance Among Older Adults with Disabilities. BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2023, p. 671.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Accessible Commercial Airline Travel for Mobility Device Users: A Focus Group Study with Veterans

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material