The maintenance of roadways, bikeways, and sidewalks affects the users of not only the mode in which the maintenance action is taken, but also the users of other co-located modes. When such actions are taken simultaneously, either because of stovepiping in maintenance planning across modes or from larger projects that bundle these activities to improve efficiencies and reduce monetary costs, the activities can have very significant impacts on system users. Their impacts can be greater for the users of one mode over another and for some user groups over others. To capture the perspectives of diverse users and multi-modal traffic on shared facilities, a multi-modal network modeling methodology considering several additional important attributes (e.g., safety, slope, and costs at intersections) is proposed. An embedded traffic assignment model in mixed traffic of different modes is solved through a fast bush-based traffic assignment algorithm. Measurements of mobility, accessibility, safety, and proportional fairness are considered in impact evaluation. The developed method and metrics are applied to a case study replicating a portion of the business district adjacent to the University of Delaware campus. Outcomes from application of these tools show the existence of inequities across users.
SteinerF. R.ButlerK.American Planning Association. Planning and Urban Design Standards. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley and Sons, 2012.
2.
HuberT.LueckeK.HintzeM.TooleJ.Van OostenM.Guide for Maintaining Pedestrian Facilities for Enhanced Safety. Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, Washington, D.C., 2013.
3.
MahmoudzadehA.KhodakaramiM.MaC.MitchellK. N.WangX. B.ZhangY.Waterway Maintenance Budget Allocation in A Multimodal Network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Vol. 146, 2021, p. 102215.
MazumderA.SahiW.BlackD.AttanayakeU.Enhancing Non-motorized Mobility within Construction Zones. Proc., 2017 TRB National Conference on Transportation Asset Management, Washington, D.C., 2017.
6.
HarrisonJ.Code on Accessibility in the Built Environment. BC Authority, 2007.
7.
ShresthaS.ShanY.GoodrumP. M.Mapping of State Transportation Agencies’ Practices and Perceptions in Project Bundling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 597–607.
8.
QiaoY.FrickerJ. D.LabiS.Influence of Project Bundling on Maintenance of Traffic Costs across Highway Project Types. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 145, No. 8, 2019, p. 05019010.
9.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Case Studies in Cross-Asset, Multi-Objective Resource Allocation. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2020.
10.
PurnellL. O.YoderE. J.SinhaK. C.Effect of Railroad Abandonment on Rural Highway Pavement Maintenance. Civil Engineering for Practicing and Design Engineers, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1984, pp. 1–18.
11.
VavrovaM.ChangC. A.Framework to Integrate On-Road Bikeway Maintenance into Pavement Management Practices. Presented at Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting Presentation, Washington, D.C., 2015.
12.
KhodakaramiM.MitchellK.WangX.Modeling Maintenance Project Selection on a Multimodal Transportation Network. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2409: 1–8.
13.
HajibabaiL.OuyangY.Integrated Planning of Supply Chain Networks and Multimodal Transportation Infrastructure Expansion: Model Development and Application to the Biofuel Industry. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2013, pp. 247–259.
14.
MirchandaniP. B.PengD.Scheduling Work Zones in Multi-Modal Networks. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 2018.
15.
FlorianM. A.Traffic Equilibrium Model of Travel by Car and Public Transit Modes. Transportation Science, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1977, pp. 166–179.
16.
AashtianiH. Z.The Multi-Modal Traffic Assignment Problem. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1979.
17.
DafermosS.Traffic Equilibrium and Variational Inequalities. Transportation Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1980, pp. 42–54.
18.
CantarellaG. E.A General Fixed-Point Approach to Multimode Multi-User Equilibrium Assignment with Elastic Demand. Transportation Science, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1997, pp. 107–128.
19.
HrncirJ.SongQ.ZileckyP.NemetM.JakobM.Bicycle Route Planning with Route Choice Preferences. In ECAI 2014, IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2014, pp. 1149–1154.
20.
ZhuS.MaJ.TangT.ShiQ.A Combined Modal and Route Choice Behavioral Complementarity Equilibrium Model with Users of Vehicles and Electric Bicycles. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 10, 2020, p. 3704.
21.
SiB.LongJ.GaoZ.Optimization Model and Algorithm for Mixed Traffic of Urban Road Network with Flow Interference. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, Vol. 51, No. 12, 2008, pp. 2223–2232.
22.
ZhangT.YangY.ChengG.JinM.A Practical Traffic Assignment Model for Multimodal Transport System Considering Low-Mobility Groups. Mathematics, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2020, p. 351.
23.
SemlerC.VestA.KingsleyK.MahS.KittelsonW.SundstromC.BrookshireK.Guidebook for Developing Pedestrian and Bicycle Performance Measures. Report No. FHWA-HEP-16-037. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2016.
24.
MurphyB.OwenA.Access Across America: Auto 2019. University of Minnesota, MN, 2021.
25.
ElefteriadouL. A.The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis. ITE Journal, Vol. 86, No. 4, 2016, pp. 14–18.
26.
MonsereC.WangH.WangY.ChenC.Risk Factors for Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2017.
27.
Di CiommoF.How the Inaccessibility Index Can Improve Transport Planning and Investment. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, Vol. 2018/08, 2018, pp. 1–23.
28.
AalamiS.KattanL.Fair Dynamic Resource Allocation in Transit-based Evacuation Planning. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 23, 2017, pp. 400–419.
29.
NordbackK.MarshallW. E.JansonB. N.Bicyclist Safety Performance Functions for a U.S. City. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 65, 2014, pp. 114–122.
30.
DolatsaraH. A.Development of Safety Performance Functions for Non-Motorized Traffic Safety. Master’s Thesis. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 2014.
31.
JonssonT.Safety Performance Models for Pedestrians and Bicyclists. Proc., 16th Road Safety on Four Continents Conference, Beijing, China, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, D.C., 2016, p. 10.
32.
SchonfeldP. M.Miller-HooksE.ZhaoK.ConradD.Safe Accommodation of Bicyclists on High-Speed Roadways in Maryland. Report No. MD-16-SHA-UM-4-06. Maryland State Highway Administration, North Calvert Street, Baltimore, 2016.
33.
LitmanT.Evaluating Transportation Equity: Guidance for Incorporating Distributional Impacts in Transport Planning. ITE Journal, Vol. 92, No. 4, 2022, pp. 44–49.
34.
LevinsonD.KingD.Transport Access Manual: A Guide for Measuring Connection Between People and Places. Committee of the Transport Access Manual, Sydney, Australia, 2020.
35.
YeQ. C.ZhangY.DekkerR.Fair Task Allocation in Transportation. Omega, Vol. 68, 2017, pp. 1–16.
36.
LiX.ReyD.DixitV. V.An Axiomatic Characterization of Fairness in Transport Networks: Application to Road Pricing and Spatial Equity. Transport Policy, Vol. 68, 2018, pp. 142–157.
37.
BillsT. S.SallE. A.WalkerJ. L.Activity-based Travel Models and Transportation Equity Analysis: Research Directions and Exploration of Model Performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2320: 18–27.
38.
DialR. B.A Path-based User-Equilibrium Traffic Assignment Algorithm That Obviates Path Storage and Enumeration. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2006, pp. 917–936.
39.
PatrikssonM.The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, 1994.
40.
NieY. M.A Class of Bush-Based Algorithms for The Traffic Assignment Problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2010, pp. 73–89.
41.
DialR. B.Minimal-revenue Congestion Pricing Part I: A Fast Algorithm for The Single-Origin Case. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1999, pp. 189–202.
42.
EricksonW.LeeC.von SchraderS.2018 Disability Status Report: United States. Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute on Employment and Disability, Ithaca, New York, 2020.
2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 2010.
45.
DowlingR.RyusP.SchroederB.KyteM.CreaseyT.RouphailN.HajbabaieA.RhoadesD.Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2016. https://doi.org/10.17226/23632.
46.
RyusP.MusunuruA.BonnesonJ.KothuriS.MonsereC.McNeilN.LaJeunesseS.NordbackK.KumferW.CurrinS.Guide to Pedestrian Analysis. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2022.
ChaiS.LiangQ.An Improved NSGA-II Algorithm for Transit Network Design and Frequency Setting Problem. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1–20.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
