The present paper focuses on the adoption of light-duty electric vehicles (EVs), encompassing a comprehensive review and summary analysis of the existing research in the field to identify forthcoming research directions. An emerging interest in understanding factors that influence and accelerate the widespread adoption of EVs has produced insightful research from a variety of disciplines including transportation, natural resources, and social sciences. Considering the vast variety of research endeavors, it is important to establish a baseline understanding of consumer EV adoption to provide an agenda for future research needed to advance current knowledge. This review focuses on aggregating insights gained from 437 research articles across disciplines. Specifically, we systematically reviewed journal articles on EV adoption with the goal of identifying theories used to understand EV adoption, methods by which data was collected, and key findings related to perceived advantages of, and barriers to, EV adoption. Our results help draw an overarching picture of the state of the art in research on EV adoption across disciplines, and identify remaining gaps. We conclude by showing an evolution of methodological practices in EV research and suggesting potential avenues for future research that may be of interest to both academics and practitioners interested in accelerating the widespread adoption of electrified transportation by consumers.
GuoS.KontouE.Disparities and Equity Issues in Electric Vehicles Rebate Allocation. Energy Policy, Vol. 154, 2021, p. 112291.
2.
WhittleC.WhitmarshL.HaggarP.MorganP.ParkhurstG.User Decision-Making in Transitions to Electrified, Autonomous, Shared or Reduced Mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 71, 2019, pp. 302–319.
3.
AhmadF.AlamM. S.AsaadM.Developments in xEVs Charging Infrastructure and Energy Management System for Smart Microgrids Including xEVs. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 35, 2017, pp. 552–564.
4.
PellowM. A.AmbroseH.MulvaneyD.BetitaR.ShawS.Research Gaps in Environmental Life Cycle Assessments of Lithium Ion Batteries for Grid-Scale Stationary Energy Storage Systems: End-of-Life Options and Other Issues. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, Vol. 23, 2020, p. e00120.
5.
RezvaniZ.JanssonJ.BodinJ.Advances in Consumer Electric Vehicle Adoption Research: A Review and Research Agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 34, 2015, pp. 122–136.
6.
BrowneK.Snowball Sampling: Using Social Networks to Research Non-heterosexual Women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005, pp. 47–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663.
7.
Icek Ajzen, The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1991, pp. 179–211.
8.
BarbarossaC.BeckmannS. C.De PelsmackerP.MoonsI.GwozdzW.A Self-Identity Based Model of Electric Car Adoption Intention: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 42, 2015, pp. 149–160.
9.
AxsenJ.TyreeHagemanJ.LentzA.Lifestyle Practices and Pro-Environmental Technology. Ecological Economics, Vol. 82, 2012, pp. 64–74.
10.
YoungJ. C.RoseD. C.MumbyH. S.Benitez-CapistrosF.DerrickC. J.FinchT.GarciaC., et al. A Methodological Guide to Using and Reporting on Interviews in Conservation Science Research. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2018, pp. 10–19.
YilmazK.Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Traditions: Epistemological, Theoretical, and Methodological Differences. European Journal of Education, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2013, pp. 311–325.
13.
DegirmenciK.BreitnerM. H.Consumer Purchase Intentions for Electric Vehicles: Is Green More Important Than Price and Range?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 51, 2017, pp. 250–260.
14.
SchläpferF.FischhoffB.Task Familiarity and Contextual Cues Predict Hypothetical Bias in a Meta-Analysis of Stated Preference Studies. Ecological Economics, Vol. 81, 2012, pp. 44–47.
15.
HeffnerR. R.KuraniK. S.TurrentineT. S.Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2007, pp. 396–413.
16.
EgbueO.LongS.Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Consumer Attitudes and Perceptions. Energy Policy, Vol. 48, 2012, pp. 717–729.
17.
SovacoolB. K.BurkeM.BakerL.KotikalapudiC. K.WlokasH. (2017). New Frontiers and Conceptual Frameworks for Energy Justice. Energy Policy, Vol. 105, 2017, pp. 677–691.
18.
WangH.WangR.CaiK.HeH.LiuY.YenJ.WangZ.XuM.SunY.ZhouX.YinQ.TangL.DobruckiI. T.DobruckiL. W.ChaneyE. J.BoppartS. A.FanT. M.LezmiS.ChenX.YinL.ChengJ.Selective in Vivo Metabolic Cell-Labeling-Mediated Cancer Targeting. Nature Chemical Biology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2017, pp. 415–424.
19.
StrykerS.BurkeP. J.(2000). The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 9, 2000, pp. 284–297.
20.
ArnockyS.StroinkM.DeCiccoT.Self-Construal Predicts Environmental Concern, Cooperation, and Conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2007, pp. 255–264.
21.
AxsenJ.TyreeHagemanJ.LentzA.Lifestyle Practices and Pro-Environmental Technology. Ecological Economics, Vol. 82, 2012, pp. 64–74.
22.
RezvaniZ.JanssonJ.BengtssonM.Consumer Motivations for Sustainable Consumption: The Interaction of Gain, Normative and Hedonic Motivations on Electric Vehicle Adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 27, No. 8, 2018, pp. 1272–1283.
23.
YuenK. F.CaiL.QiG.WangX.Factors Influencing Autonomous Vehicle Adoption: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model and Innovation Diffusion Theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2021, pp. 505–519.
24.
JakovcevicA.StegL.Sustainable Transportation in Argentina: Values, Beliefs, Norms and Car use Reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 20, 2013, pp. 70–79.
25.
HardmanS.ShiuE.Steinberger-WilckensR.TurrentineT.Barriers to the Adoption of Fuel Cell Vehicles: A Qualitative Investigation into Early Adopters Attitudes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice>, Vol. 95, 2017, pp. 166–182.
26.
EncarnaçãoS.SantosF. P.SantosF. C.BlassV.PachecoJ. M.PortugaliJ.Paths to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 113, 2018, pp. 24–33.
27.
GovindanK.HasanagicM.A Systematic Review on Drivers, Barriers, and Practices Towards Circular Economy: A Supply Chain Perspective. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56, No. 1–2, 2018, pp. 278–311.
HaleyB.Low-Carbon Innovation from a Hydroelectric Base: The Case of Electric Vehicles in Québec. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 14, 2015, pp. 5–25.
31.
BrymanA.Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press, UK, 2004.
32.
RanneyM. L.MeiselZ. F.ChooE. K.GarroA. C.SassonC.Morrow GuthrieK.Interview-Based Qualitative Research in Emergency Care Part II: Data Collection, Analysis and Results Reporting. Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 9, 2015, 1103–1112.
HanH.JeongW.WolframD.Log Analysis of Academic Digital Library: User Query Patterns. In Conference 2014 Proceedings, 2014, pp. 1002–1008.
35.
LouviereJ. J.FlynnT. N.CarsonR. T.Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2010, pp. 57–72.
36.
AdamowiczW.LouviereJ.WilliamsM.Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1994, pp. 271–292.
37.
HaoP.WuG.BoriboonsomsinK.BarthM. J.Eco-Approach and Departure (EAD) Application for Actuated Signals in Real-World Traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 20No. 1,
2018, pp. 30–40.
38.
WhiteheadJ. C.WeddellM. S.GroothuisP. A.Mitigating Hypothetical Bias In Stated Preference Data: Evidence From Sports Tourism. Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2016, pp. 605–611.
39.
PriessnerA.HamplN.Can Product Bundling Increase the Joint Adoption of Electric Vehicles, Solar Panels and Battery Storage? Explorative Evidence from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Austria. Ecological Economics, 167, 2020, p. 106381.
40.
PolkinghorneD. E.Language and Meaning: Data Collection in Qualitative Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 2, 2005, p. 137.
41.
Solvi HoenF.Díez-GutiérrezM.BabriS.HessS.TørsetT.Charging Electric Vehicles on Long Trips and the Willingness to Pay to Reduce Waiting for Charging. Stated Preference Survey in Norway. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 175,
2023, 9. 103774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103774
42.
LiL.WangZ.XieX.From Government to Market? A Discrete Choice Analysis of Policy Instruments for Electric Vehicle Adoption. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 160, 2022, pp. 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103774
JaiswalD.KantR.SinghP. K.YadavR.Investigating the Role of Electric Vehicle Knowledge in Consumer Adoption: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1027–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2020-0579
45.
WeldonP.MorrisseyP.BradyJ.O’MahonyM.An investigation into usage 7 patterns of electric vehicles in Ireland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 43, No. 82016, pp. 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.013
46.
PowellS.CezarG. V.RajagopalR.Scalable probabilistic estimates of electric vehicle charging given observed driver behavior. Applied Energy, Vol. 309, 2022, p. 118382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11838212
47.
SodenkampM.WenigJ.ThiesseF.StaakeT.Who can Drive Electric? Segmentation of Car Drivers Based on Longitudinal GPS Travel Data. Energy Policy, Vol. 130, 2019, pp. 111–129. 14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.04815
48.
JabbariP.ChernicoffW.MacKenzieD.Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchaser Satisfaction and Rejection Reasons. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2628, No. 1, 2017, pp. 110–119. https://doi.org/10.3141/2628-25122681.
49.
SrinivasanK. K.Reddy AthuruS.Modeling Interaction between Internet Communication and Travel Activities: Evidence from Bay Area, California, Travel Survey 2000. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1894,No. 1, 2004, pp. 230–240.
ConwayM. W.SalonD.KingD. A.Trends in Taxi Use and the Advent of Ridehailing, 1995–2017: Evidence from the US National Household Travel Survey. Urban Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2018, p. 79.
52.
GohilS.VuikS.DarziA.Sentiment Analysis of Health Care Tweets: Review of the Methods Used. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, Vol. 4, No.2, 2018, p. e5789. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.5789
53.
DurandC. P.TangX.GabrielK. P.SenerI. N.OluyomiA. O.KnellG.PorterA. K.HoelscherD. M.KohlH. W.III. The Association of Trip Distance with Walking to Reach Public Transit: Data from the California Household Travel Survey. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2016, 154–160.
54.
ProbstJ. C.LaditkaS. B.WangJ. Y.JohnsonA. O.Effects of Residence and Race on Burden of Travel for Care: Cross Sectional Analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey. BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1–13.
55.
KumarR. R.AlokK.Adoption of Electric Vehicle: A Literature Review and Prospects for Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol.d253, 2020, p. 119911.
56.
BeakY.KimK.MaengK.ChoY.Is the Environment-Friendly Factor Attractive to Customers when Purchasing Electric Vehicles? Evidence from South Korea. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2020, pp. 996–1006.
57.
BroadbentG. H.DrozdzewskiD.MetternichtG.Electric Vehicle Adoption: An Analysis of Best practice and pitfalls for policy making from experiences of Europe and the US. Geography Compass, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12358
58.
AxsenJ.CairnsJ.DusykN.GoldbergS.What Drives the Pioneers? Applying Lifestyle Theory to Early Electric Vehicle Buyers in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 44, 2018, pp. 17–30.
59.
KhuranaA.KumarV. R.SidhpuriaM.A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vision, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2020, pp. 23–34.
60.
O’NeillE.MooreD.KelleherL.BreretonF.Barriers to Electric Vehicle Uptake in Ireland: Perspectives of Car-Dealers and Policy-Makers. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 118–127.
61.
Carpenter Tommy. Measuring & Mitigating Electric Vehicle Adoption Barriers. UWSpace, University of Waterloo, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/9096
62.
GopalA. R.ParkW. Y.WittM.PhadkeA.Hybrid-and Battery-Electric Vehicles Offer Low Cost Climate Benefits in China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 62, 2018, pp. 362–371.
63.
GhasriM.ArdeshiriA.RashidiT.Perception Towards Electric Vehicles and the Impact on Consumers’ Preference. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 77, 2019, pp. 271–291.
64.
CookeN. J.HiltonM. L.National Research Council: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science, 2015.
65.
JungM. F.SirkinD.GürT. M.SteinertM.Displayed Uncertainty Improves Driving Experience and Behavior: The Case of Range Anxiety in an Electric Car. In Proc., 33rd Annual 22 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2015, pp. 2201–2210.
66.
Nguyen-PhuocD. Q.NguyenN. A. N.TranP. T. K.PhamH.-G.Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.The Influence Of Environmental Concerns and Psychosocial Factors on Electric Motorbike Switching Intention in the Global South. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 113, 2023, p. 103705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103705
67.
BongesH. A.IIILuskA. C.Addressing Electric Vehicle (EV) Sales and range anxiety through 24 parking layout, policy and regulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 83, 2016, pp. 63–73.
68.
HaddadianG.KhodayarM.ShahidehpourM.Accelerating the Global Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Barriers and Drivers. The Electricity Journal, Vol. 28, No. 10, 2015, pp. 53–68.
69.
RezvaniZ.JanssonJ.BengtssonM.Consumer Motivations for Sustainable Consumption: The Interaction of Gain, Normative and Hedonic Motivations on Electric Vehicle Adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 27, No. 8, 2018, pp. 1272–1283.
70.
AdnanN.NordinS. M.RahmanI.AminiM. H.A Market Modeling Review Study on Predicting Malaysian Consumer Behavior Towards Widespread Adoption of PHEV/EV. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 24, No. 22, 2017, pp. 17955–17975.
71.
ChristiaensS.OgrzewallaJ.PischingerS.Functional Safety for Hybrid and Electric Vehicles. SAE Technical Paper Series, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0032
72.
HausteinS.JensenA. F.Factors of Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Comparison of Conventional and Electric Car Users Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2018, pp. 484–496.
73.
HeX.ZhanW.HuY.Consumer Purchase Intention of Electric Vehicles in China: The Roles of Perception and Personality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 2018, pp. 1060–1069.
74.
DazianoR. A.ChiewE.Electric Vehicles Rising from the Dead: Data Needs for Forecasting Consumer Response Toward Sustainable Energy Sources in Personal Transportation. Energy Policy, Vol. 51, 2012, 876–894.
75.
HanslaA.GambleA.JuliussonA.GärlingT.The Relationships Between Awareness of Consequences, Environmental Concern, and Value Orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2008, pp. 371–9.
76.
JarvenpaaS. L.StaplesD. S.The Use of Collaborative Electronic Media for Information Sharing: An Exploratory Study of Determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 2-3, 2000, pp. 129–154.
77.
KwonO.WenY.An Empirical Study of the Factors Affecting Social Network Service Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2010, pp. 254–263.
78.
NeckermannL. The Mobility Revolution: Zero Emissions, Zero Accidents, Zero Ownership. Troubador Publishing Ltd, 2015.
79.
AdeyaC. N.Wireless Technologies and Development in Africa. Unpublished Report. 2005.
