This scoping review maps the breadth of cultural competence research in library and information science, analysing themes and geographical and temporal trends, and identifying research gaps. Using bibliometric methods, 55 documents indexed in Scopus were examined for citation and keyword co-occurrence networks. The findings show cultural competence to be a niche but impactful field, with research output led by the USA. The dominant themes include diversity, equity, inclusion and multiculturalism, with emerging areas like intersectionality and social justice underexplored. The temporal trends reveal a shift from foundational to nuanced topics, although gaps in cross-regional collaboration and thematic integration remain. The study underscores the need for global participation and focused research to enhance cultural competence's relevance in addressing systemic inequities. By identifying critical gaps and opportunities, this research provides a foundation for advancing equity, diversity and inclusion in library and information science.
AdeogunM (2022) Increasing patron’s outreach and engagement through relationship marketing: A case study. Journal of Library Administration62(3): 359–375.
2.
AlenzuelaR (2021) Cultural competency of Ni-Vanuatu librarians: Vanuatu libraries contribution to the nation’s vibrant cultural identity. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association70(4): 405–423.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL (2005) Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 19–32.
5.
BaasJSchottenMPlumeA, et al. (2020) Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies1(1): 377–386.
6.
BecvarKSrinivasanR (2009) Indigenous knowledge and culturally responsive methods in information research. Library Quarterly79(4): 421–441.
7.
BlackburnF (2015) Cultural competence is for everyone: Cultural competence in the United States library and information sector: Is it relevant to Australian libraries?Australian Academic and Research Libraries46(3): 176–193.
8.
BlackburnF (2017) Community engagement, cultural competence and two Australian public libraries and Indigenous communities. IFLA Journal43(3): 288–301.
9.
BlackburnF (2020) Cultural competence: Toward a more robust conceptualisation?Library Quarterly39(3): 229–245.
10.
BurnhamJF (2006) Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries3: Article 1.
11.
BurnsE (2021) Weaving diversity into LIS instruction: Equity behaviors to create the tapestry of inclusive library practice. In: 2021 IASL annual conference proceedings, 12–16 July 2021, Denton, TX, USA, pp.1–15. Edmonton: University of Alberta Library.
12.
CruzAM (2019) Intentional integration of diversity ideals in academic libraries: A literature review. Journal of Academic Librarianship45(3): 220–227.
13.
De Moya-AnegonFChinchilla-RodriguezZVargas-QuesadaB, et al. (2007) Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach. Scientometrics73: 53–78.
14.
ElyER (2022) Exploring cultural competence: A case study of two academic libraries. Portal22(2): 395–419.
15.
FeuerMTowneLStevensonR (2002) Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher31(8): 4–14.
16.
FosterE (2018) Cultural competence in library instruction: A reflective practical approach. Portal18(3): 575–593.
17.
FoyCM (2021) Successful application of diversity, equity, and inclusion in various professional settings: Strategies to increase DEI in libraries. Journal of Library Administration61(6): 676–685.
18.
Garwood-HoungABlackburnF (2014) The ATSILIRN protocols: A twenty-first century guide to appropriate library services for and about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Australian Library Journal63(1): 4–15.
19.
GrbichC (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
20.
GreenJThorogoodN (2004) Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage, 177–180.
21.
GuyuttotOLe FurE (2023) A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of research on COVID-19 in strategy journals. Strategic Change32(2–3): 85–102.
IonG (2012) Educational research impact: Implications for university management. Conference Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education8(2): 423–427.
24.
JaegerPShiltonKKoepflerJ (2016) The rise of social justice as a guiding principle in library and information science research. Library Quarterly86(1): 1–9.
25.
JaegerPSubramaniamMJonesC, et al. (2011) Diversity and LIS education: Inclusion and the age of information. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science52(2): 166–183.
26.
JerniganVHearodJTranK, et al. (2016) An examination of cultural competence training in US medical education guided by the Tool for Assessing Cultural Competence Training. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice9(3): 150–167.
27.
JohnsonNELedbetterWC (2022) Expanding the narrative of intercultural competence: A study of library faculty and staff. International Journal of Information, Diversity and Inclusion6(3): 4–21.
28.
KamaliaSIbrahimCChafitA, et al. (2024) Knowledge mapping in the field of library and information science in Scopus-indexed Q1 library science journals, 2018–2022. Revista Cubana de Informacion en Ciencias de la Salud35: Article e2659.
29.
LiHAnHWangY, et al. (2016) Evolutionary features of academic libraries co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network. Physica A: Statistics Mechanics and Its Applications450: 657–669.
30.
LinWBoamahE (2019) Auckland libraries as a multicultural bridge in New Zealand. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication68(6–7): 581–600.
31.
LopezMMehraBCapseM (2023) An exploratory social justice framework to develop public library services with underserved families. Public Library Quarterly42(6): 576–601.
32.
MaestroRSRamos-EcleviaMEcleviaCL, et al. (2018) Teaching diversity, becoming inclusive: Perspectives and possibilities in ASEAN library and information science schools. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association67(2): 96–115.
33.
MehraBSrinivasanR (2007) The library–community convergence framework for community action: Libraries as catalysts of social change. Libris57(3): 123–139.
34.
MestreLS (2010) Librarians working with diverse populations: What impact does cultural competency training have on their efforts?Journal of Academic Librarianship36(6): 479–488.
35.
Morgan-DanielJHoughCTennantM, et al. (2022) Developing a culture of inclusivity through a library diversity, equity, and inclusion team, Part 2: Team activities. Medical Reference Services Quarterly41(2): 127–137.
36.
NicholsonSHayesMTaylorJ (2016) Cultural competency education in academic dental institutions in Australia and New Zealand: A survey study. Journal of Dental Education80(8): 966–974.
37.
OverallPM (2009) Cultural competence: A conceptual framework for library and information science professionals. Library Quarterly79(2): 175–204.
38.
OverallPM (2010) The effect of service learning on LIS students’ understanding of diversity issues related to equity of access. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science51(4): 251–266.
39.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytP, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372: n71.
40.
PooleAAgostoDGreenbergJ, et al. (2021) Where do we stand? Diversity, equity, inclusion, and social justice in North American library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science62(3): 258–286.
41.
PressNODiggs-HobsonM (2005) Providing health information to community members where they are: Characteristics of the culturally competent librarian. Library Trends53(3): 397–410.
42.
RenXAlemanneNColsonL (2021) How MLIS programs prepare students to serve diverse populations: The North American context. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science63(3): 301–320.
43.
ShorishYNowviskieB (2022) Dialogue: Shorish and Nowviskie. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies4(1): 1–11.
44.
SinghR (2022) Race, privilege, and intersectionality: Navigating inconvenient truths through self-exploration. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science63(3): 277–300.
45.
SommervilleMMCooperLTorhellC, et al. (2015) At home in the world: International library staff exchange program highlights. IFLA Journal41(4): 326–335.
46.
StapletonJCarterCBredahlL (2020) Developing systematic search methods for the library literature: Methods and analysis. Journal of Academic Librarianship46: Article 102190.
47.
Van EckNJWaltmanL (2010) Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics84(2): 523–528.
48.
VillagranMALHawamdehS (2020) Cultural competence in LIS education: A case study of United States ranked schools. Multicultural Education Review12(2): 136–155.
49.
YuenEChoADoyleAM, et al. (2009) Dimensions of responsive multicultural library services at the University of British Columbia: Successes and challenges. In: IFLA satellite meeting 2008, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 5–7 August 2008..
50.
ZhaoYWeeHGaniA (2024) A bibliometric analysis of destination image research using VOSviewer. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences14(7): 2397–2424.
