Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents a bibliometric analysis of the library and information science literature to trace the emphasis that intellectual freedom and neutrality have received relative to an index of alternative and possibly competing topics. Emphasis is captured longitudinally by recording the number of results for various search terms associated with intellectual freedom, neutrality, diversity, equity, and inclusion in Web of Science from 1993 through 2020 and Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts from 1970 through 2020. The results show that the number of works mentioning intellectual freedom and neutrality has increased only slightly over the study period, in sharp contrast to many entries on the diversity, equity, and inclusion index. With research interests being partially indicative of personal beliefs and professional activity, the impact of this relative change in emphasis on professional practice is discussed. Public controversies regarding library neutrality, intellectual freedom, and freedom of expression in libraries are summarized.

Keywords

Library and information science bibliometrics intellectual freedom censorship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Libraries (2018) Are libraries neutral? American Libraries 49(6): 32–38.

American Library Association (2008) Code of Ethics of the American Library Association. Available at: https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics (accessed 11 June 2021).

American Library Association (2020) ALA statement on Executive Order on Combating Race and Sex Stereotyping. Available at: https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2020/10/ala-statement-executive-order-combating-race-and-sex-stereotyping (accessed 22 February 2021).

American Library Association Council (2017) Equity, diversity, inclusion: An interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights. Available at: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill/interpretations/EDI (accessed 27 May 2021).

American Library Association Council (2021) Resolution to Condemn White Supremacy and Fascism as Antithetical to Library Work, CD #43. Available at: https://www.ala.org/aboutala/sites/ala.org.aboutala/files/content/ALA%20CD%2043%20Resolution%20to%20Condemn%20White%20Supremacy%20and%20Fascism%20as%20Antithetical%20to%20Library%20Work%20Final_0.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3usPV0hvotP9WnD4c69KKMiSKg8HsFjFbidA9TQPcP_cqjAgH68-GM3Y8 (accessed 26 January 2021).

Bloom

(2019) The rise of the viewpoint-discrimination principle. SMU Law Review Forum 72(1): 20–40.

Breheny

Stromberg

Lambert

(2018) p-Value histograms: Inference and diagnostics. High-Throughput 7(3): Article 23.

Cronin

Meho

(2009) Receiving the French: A bibliometric snapshot of the impact of “French theory” on information studies. Journal of Information Science 35(4): 398–413.

Erb

(2021) Toward a better understanding of systemic racism. Areo, 13 April.

10.

Executive Office of the President (2020) Executive Order 13950: Combating race and sex stereotyping. Federal Register, 28 September. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/09/28/2020-21534/combating-race-and-sex-stereotyping (accessed 22 February 2021).

11.

Farkas

(2017) Never neutral. American Libraries 48(1–2): 70.

12.

Goldberg

(2013) Libraries stress neutrality as they prep for queries on health care law. American Libraries 44(9–10): 13.

13.

Goldberg

(2020) How the media led the great racial awakening. Tablet Magazine, 5 August. Available at: https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/media-great-racial-awakening (accessed 6 August 2020).

14.

Griffin

(2013) What fascism is not and is: Thoughts on the re-inflation of a concept. Fascism 2(2): 259–261.

15.

IFLA (1999) IFLA Statement on Libraries and Intellectual Freedom. Available at: https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-statement-on-libraries-and-intellectual-freedom (accessed 28 May 2021).

16.

Jacoby

(2020) On Diversity: The Eclipse of the Individual in a Global Era. New York: Seven Stories Press.

17.

Jones

(2018) Institutional neutrality isn’t reality: Libraries and higher ed must acknowledge that some expression oppresses others. American Libraries 49(5): 21.

18.

Kelso

(2019) Clarifying viewpoint discrimination in free speech doctrine. Indiana Law Review 53(3): 355–429.

19.

McClung

(2019) Is it really that simple? Review of editorial “For diversity in library leadership, administrators should look to access services.” Journal of Access Services 16(2–3): 53–55.

20.

Mason

(2018) Value pluralism. In: Zalta

(ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2018 ed. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/value-pluralism/ (accessed 10 June 2021).

21.

Rhoads

(2019) Viewpoint diversity: Donating free-market materials to university libraries. Academic Questions 32(4): 582–587.

22.

Roemer

Borchardt

(2015) Meaningful Metrics: A 21st Century Librarian’s Guide to Bibliometrics, Altmetrics, and Research Impact. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.

23.

Rozado

(2020) Prejudice and victimization themes in New York Times discourse: A chronological analysis. Academic Questions 33(1): 89–100.

24.

Schroeder

Hollister

(2014) Librarians’ views on critical theories and critical practices. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 33(2): 91–119.

25.

Scott

Saunders

(2021) Neutrality in public libraries: How are we defining one of our core values? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 53(1): 153–166.

26.

Tewell

(2018) The practice and promise of critical information literacy: Academic librarians’ involvement in critical library instruction. College and Research Libraries 79(1). Available at: https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/16616

27.

Vile

Hudson

Schultz

(eds) (2009a) Content based. In: Encyclopedia of the First Amendment. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Available at: https://sk.sagepub.com/cqpress/encyclopedia-of-the-first-amendment/n365.xml

28.

Vile

Hudson

Schultz

(eds) (2009b) Content neutral. In: Encyclopedia of the First Amendment. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Available at: https://sk.sagepub.com/cqpress/encyclopedia-of-the-first-amendment/n366.xml

29.

Vile

Hudson

Schultz

(eds) (2009c) Neutrality, speech. In: Encyclopedia of the First Amendment. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Available at: DOI: https://sk.sagepub.com/cqpress/encyclopedia-of-the-first-amendment/n934.xml

30.

Vought

(2020) Training in the Federal Government. Memorandum, Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, USA, 4 September. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/M-20-34.pdf

31.

Wenzler

(2019) Neutrality and its discontents: An essay on the ethics of librarianship. portal 19(1): 55–78.

32.

Winberry

Bishop

(2021) Documenting social justice in library and information science research: A literature review. Journal of Documentation 77(3): 743–754.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

Intellectual freedom and alternative priorities in library and information science research: A longitudinal study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material