The development of LibGuides at Cape Peninsula University of Technology Libraries and the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on their usage

Abstract

LibGuides have been used by librarians at Cape Peninsula University of Technology since 2012 as a means of providing subject-based information to students, with quick links to selected resources and information supplementing information literacy training. Lecturers use the resources for preparing lectures and identifying learning materials, while researchers and postgraduate students use research support guides when writing their papers. As the worldwide pandemic caused a major lockdown, academic institutions in South Africa were closed and students sent home. However, students still needed to complete their studies, and librarians at Cape Peninsula University of Technology had to continue providing support to these students. One of the online services available was LibGuides. This article provides insight into the historical developments of LibGuides at Cape Peninsula University of Technology, the use of LibGuides during lockdown, and the experiences of a selected group of students and librarians.

Keywords

COVID-19 lockdown LibGuides academic libraries South Africa LibAnswers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alfaresi

Hone

(2015) The intention to use mobile digital library technology: A focus group study in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction 7(2): 23–42.

Association of College and Research Libraries (2019) Environmental scan 2019. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/EnvironmentalScan2019.pdf (accessed 20 September 2020).

Bangani

Masilo

Kekana

, et al. (2019) LibGuides as a collection development tool: The case of North-West University, South Africa. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 2944. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2944

Bangani

Tshetsha

(2013) Creating, collaborating and contributing through LibGuides at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT). Available at: https://conferences.sun.ac.za/index.php/liasa/liasa-2013/paper/view/1259/376

Barbour

(2018) Doing Focus Groups. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Bausman

Ward

Pell

(2014) Beyond satisfaction: Understanding and promoting the instructor–librarian relationship. New Review of Academic Librarianship 20(2): 117–136.

Cape Peninsula University of Technology (2020) COVID-19: Staff contingency plan, version 1. 8 May. Available https://www.cput.ac.za/storage/about/COVID-19/COVID19%20STAFF%20CONTINGENCY%20PLAN%202-6-2020.pdf

Chiware

(2014) The efficacy of course-specific library guides to support essay writing at the University of Cape Town. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science 80(2): 27–35.

Davis

(1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192

10.

Davis

Bagozzi

Warshaw

(1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35(8): 982–1003.

11.

Dobbs

Sittler

Cook

(2013) Using LibGuides to Enhance Library Services: A LITA Guide. New York: American Library Association.

12.

England

(2011) Electronic resources evaluation central: Using off-the-shelf software, Web 2.0 tools and LibGuides to manage an electronic resources evaluation process. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 23(1): 30–42.

13.

Fry

(2014) The biggest winner: Using statistics to assess the effectiveness of an e-resources promotional campaign. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 26(1): 1–16.

14.

Gonzalez

Westbrock

(2010) Reaching out with LibGuides: Establishing a working set of best practices. Journal of Library Administration 50(5–6): 638–656.

15.

Greeff

(2011) Information collection: Interviewing. In: De Vos

Strydom

Delport

CSL

(eds) Research at Grass Roots. 4th ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 341–374.

16.

Griffin

Lewis

(2011) Transforming special collections through innovative uses for LibGuides. Collection Building 30(1): 5–10.

17.

Harding

(2019) Qualitative Data Analysis: From Start to Finish. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

18.

Hesse-Biber

(2017) The Practice of Qualitative Research: Engaging Students in the Research Process. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.

19.

Hwee

Yew

(2018). The constructs that influence students’ acceptance of an e-library system in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 14(2): 75–82.

20.

Jeong

(2011) An investigation of user perceptions and behavioral intentions towards the e-library. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 35(2–3): 45–60.

21.

Joo

Choi

(2015) Factors affecting undergraduates’ selection of online library resources in academic tasks. Library Hi Tech 33(2): 272–291.

22.

Khan

Qutab

(2016) Understanding research students’ behavioural intention in the adoption of digital libraries. Library Review 65(4–5): 295–319.

23.

Kolah

Fosmire

(2010) Information portals: A new tool for teaching information literacy skills. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 60. Available at: http://www.istl.org/10-winter/refereed1.HTML

24.

Lederman

(2015) What is a theoretical framework? A practical answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education 26(7): 593–597.

25.

Lewis

(2016) Reimagining the Academic Library. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

26.

Little

Fallon

Dauenhauer

, et al. (2010) Interdisciplinary collaboration: A faculty learning community creates a comprehensive LibGuide. Reference Services Review 38(3): 431–444.

27.

Marchetti

Cullen

(2016) A multimodal approach in the classroom for creative learning and teaching. CASALC Review 41: 39–51. Available: https://docplayer.net/36106808-A-multimodal-approach-in-the-classroom-for-creative-learning-and-teaching.html

28.

Merriam

Tisdell

(2016) Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

29.

Mokia

Rolen

(2012) LibGuides: Improving student and faculty access to information literacy. Codex 1(4): 37–45.

30.

Mooney

(2012) Working with LibGuides: Student or corporate centre design? Reference Reviews 26(1). Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/rr.2012.09926aaa.002/full/html

31.

Neves

Dooley

(2011) Using LibGuides to offer library service to undergraduate medical students based on the case-oriented problem solving curriculum model. Journal of the Medical Library Association 99(1): 94–97.

32.

Ngulube

(2018) Overcoming the difficulties associated with using conceptual and theoretical frameworks in heritage studies. In: Ngulube

(ed.) Handbook of Research on Heritage Management and Preservation. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 1–23.

33.

Nov

(2008) Users’ personality and perceived ease of use of digital libraries: The case for resistance to change. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(5): 845–851.

34.

Omotayo

Haliru

(2020) Perception of task-technology fit of digital library among undergraduates in selected universities in Nigeria. Journal of Academic Librarianship 46(1): Article 102097.

35.

Park

Roman

Lee

, et al. (2009) User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Information Management 29(3): 196–209.

36.

Petters

(2020) How to use Microsoft Teams safely: Security and compliance basics. In: Varonis blog, 17 June. Available at: https://www.varonis.com/blog/microsoft-teams/ (accessed 21 September 2020).

37.

Punch

(2006) Developing Effective Research Proposals. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.

38.

Sayekti

Mardianto

Usiono

(2020) Analyzing the acceptance of digital library system by students and librarians. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 4602. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4602

39.

Skelly

Eidelman

Underwood

(2013) Web 2.0 technology as a teaching tool. In: Tramullas

Garrido

(eds) Library Automation and OPAC 2.0: Information Access and Services in the 2.0 Landscape. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 187–205.

40.

Smulewitz

Celano

Andrade

, et al. (2013) ROI or bust: A glimpse into how librarians, publishers, and agents create value for survival. The Serials Librarian 64(1–4): 216–223.

41.

Springshare (2020) LibGuides community. Available at: https://community.libguides.com/?action=0 (accessed 10 October 2020).

42.

Strutin

(2008) Making research guides more useful and more well used. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 55. Available at: http://www.istl.org/08-fall/article5.html

43.

Thong

Hong

Tam

(2002) Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57(3): 215–242.

44.

Venkatesh

Davis

(1996) A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences 27(3): 451–481.

45.

Venkatesh

Davis

(2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2): 186–204.

46.

Weerasinghe

Hindagolla

(2017) Technology Acceptance Model in the domains of LIS and education: A review of selected Literature. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 1582. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1582

47.

(2018) Factors influencing users’ satisfaction and loyalty to digital libraries in Chinese universities. Computers in Human Behavior 83: 64–72.

48.

Yelinck

Neyer

Bressler

, et al. (2010) Using LibGuides for information literacy tutorial: Tutorial 2.0. College and Research Libraries News 71(7): 352–355.

49.

Yoon

(2016) User acceptance of mobile library applications in academic libraries: An application of the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42(6): 687–693.

50.

Zuozuo

Dongxiao

Ying

, et al. (2015) An empirical study on LibGuides continued use behaviors of the university students. Research on Library Science. Available at: https://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-TSSS201510013.htm (accessed 25 March 2021).