Erratum

Abstract

Zhao Y, Martins-Oliveira M, Akerman S, and Goadsby PJ. Comparative effects of traditional Chinese and Western migraine medicines in an animal model of nociceptive trigeminovascular activation. Cephalalgia. Epub ahead of print 24 August 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0333102417728245

In this article, some data was incorrectly reported in the following sentences. The corrections are shown in bold font below:

Page 2:

Fifty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–370 g) were anesthetized using a single dose of sodium pentobarbital (60 mg kg⁻¹ i.p.; Nembutal, Diamondback Drugs, Scottsdale, AZ) for induction, and propofol (20–25 mg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ i.v., Propoflo, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) for maintenance throughout the experiment.

Page 3:

The data collected as post-stimulus histograms after electrical stimulation of the dura mater for Ad-fibers represent the number of cells fired over at least a 10 ms period in the region 5–20 ms, and for C-fibers 20–80 ms, post-stimulation over the 20 collections.

Page 3:

Recordings were made from 54 neurons (in 54 rats) responsive to dural stimulation.

The print version of this article has been corrected.