Abstract
Background
Systemic vascular alterations have not been described in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). We present a case series of RCVS patients having cardiac dysfunction during ictus, with a subset showing complete resolution of cardiomyopathy.
Methods
Retrospective case-series: Cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion abnormalities (WMA) visualized on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), performed during RCVS ictus and follow-up was analyzed.
Results
Of 68 patients, 18 (26%) had a TTE performed around ictus. Three of 18 (17%) patients demonstrated WMA on initial TTE. All three patients were female without previous coronary artery disease or heart failure, and were asymptomatic from the cardiac dysfunction. WMA resolved completely on follow-up in Patients 1 and 2. Global LV dysfunction persisted for at least 90 days in Patient 3.
Conclusion
Although the exact pathophysiology of the cardiomyopathy is uncertain, it may be related to localized coronary vasoconstriction causing myocardial ischemia/infarction. Vasoconstriction may not be limited to the cerebral vasculature and may involve extracerebral organs. Cardiac ventricular abnormalities may be a part of the RCVS spectrum.
Keywords
Introduction
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is characterized by thunderclap headache, with or without neurological deficits, with evidence of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction on cerebral angiography (1). The pathophysiology of RCVS is thought to be secondary to alteration of intracerebral vascular tone. Systemic vascular alterations have not been described. We present a case series of RCVS patients having cardiac dysfunction during ictus, with a subset showing complete resolution of cardiomyopathy. We hypothesized that vasoconstriction in RCVS may not be limited to the cerebral vasculature.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with probable or definite RCVS at our institution from 1990 to 2013 was conducted. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, symptoms and cerebral angiography. We analyzed cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and presence of wall motion abnormalities (WMA) visualized on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), performed during the ictus of RCVS and at follow-up if available. A cardiologist independently reviewed all abnormal TTEs and electrocardiograms (EKGs).
Results
Clinical characteristics, echocardiographic and cerebrovascular imaging findings.
F: female; ICH: intracerebral hemorrhage; TTE: transthoracic echocardiography; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; WMA: wall motion abnormalities.
Discussion
We present three patients without previous CAD who developed cardiomyopathy, most likely during the ictus of RCVS. In two patients, the echocardiographic abnormalities were transient, and resolved completely much like the reversal of cerebral vasoconstriction. Although test-retest variability could account for changes in the LVEF, the resolution of WMA on comparison was striking. The improvement in cardiac function occurred within five and 12 days of symptom onset, closely paralleling cerebral vasoconstriction normalization. At last follow-up three months from symptom onset, global hypokinesis persisted in Patient 3. Although we hypothesize that onset of cardiomyopathy was concurrent with the ictus of RCVS, the cardiac disease could be unrelated to RCVS. Other potential differential diagnoses include peripartum cardiomyopathy or cardiomyopathy secondary to hypertensive disease in pregnancy as explained below.
The heart-brain connection causing acute stress-induced LV dysfunction (2) has been described with Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (3), and after subarachnoid hemorrhage causing neurocardiogenic stunning (4). With Takutsubo, transient LV WMA occurs in the apical and/or midventricular segments, with extension beyond a single epicardial coronary artery distribution, along with electrocardiographic changes. This was not the pattern seen in our patients. Another possibility specific to pregnancy is peripartum cardiomyopathy (5) and cardiomyopathy related to hypertensive pregnancy disorders (6), the etiology of which remains incompletely understood. The former has a variable course, with some showing rapid clinical and echocardiographic recovery, while others have persistent long-term cardiac dysfunction. In stress-induced cardiomyopathy, coronary spasm and myocardial adrenergic stimulation related to catecholamine excess from autonomic storming is postulated as the mechanism (2). Although we are uncertain of the exact pathophysiology of the cardiomyopathy in our patients, it may be related to localized coronary vasoconstriction causing myocardial ischemia/infarction. Indeed RCVS may be related to stress-induced, peripartum and pre-eclampsia/eclampia-induced cardiomyopathy and could represent a spectrum of the same pathophysiologic process in different vascular beds.
Extracranial vessel involvement in RCVS has been reported with occurrence of cervical artery dissection. The association between these two conditions was observed in 12% of patients with RCVS, and 7% of patients with cervical artery dissection in a prospective series (7). It is difficult to elucidate whether RCVS or dissection starts first, and whether RCVS is triggered by cervical artery dissection. Extracerebral vascular abnormalities including cardiac dysfunction have not been described in RCVS. Field et al. described a case of RCVS associated with internal carotid artery dissection, and a tight, non-atherosclerotic narrowing of the right renal artery at its mid-to-distal segment (8). However, the authors suggest that a unifying diagnosis would be fibromuscular dysplasia affecting both the carotid and renal arteries, and cerebral vasoconstriction developed after the carotid dissection.
This study has multiple limitations. Our cohort does not represent consecutive cases, and in the wide clinical spectrum of RCVS likely represents those with severe vasoconstriction with ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes. Echocardiograms were unavailable for many patients, either because of lack of medical records or because they were not performed around the ictus of RVCS. For the three patients with echocardiographic abnormalities, we do not have prior echocardiograms to compare, but the quick normalization of cardiac dysfunction suggests that it is likely related to the underlying vasoconstrictive pathophysiology of RCVS.
In conclusion, vasoconstriction may not be limited to the cerebral vasculature in RCVS and may involve extracerebral organ systems. Cardiac ventricular function abnormalities may be a part of the spectrum of RCVS. Our study is hypothesis generating, and further prospective studies of RCVS should investigate this hypothesis.
Clinical implications
The pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is thought to be secondary to alteration of intracerebral vascular tone. Systemic vascular alterations have not been described. We describe a case series of RCVS patients who developed cardiac dysfunction during the RCVS ictus. Three of 18 (17%) patients developed left ventricular wall motion abnormalities (WMA) seen on transthoracic echocardiography performed during RCVS ictus. In two of these patients, there was complete resolution of WMA within two weeks. Although the exact pathophysiology of the cardiomyopathy is uncertain, it may be related to localized coronary vasoconstriction causing myocardial ischemia/infarction. Vasoconstriction may not be limited to the cerebral vasculature in RCVS and may involve extracerebral organs. Cardiac ventricular abnormalities may be a part of the RCVS spectrum.
Footnotes
Author contributions
Dr Seby John: Study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Dr Rula A. Hajj-Ali: Study concept and design, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, study supervision.
Dr David Min: Study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Dr Leonard Calabrese: Study concept and design, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Dr Russell Cerejo: Study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Dr Ken Uchino: Study concept and design, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
