Drawing upon affective events theory (AET), this study seeks to investigate the effects of workplace contextual factors – such as procedural justice climate (PJC), or a lack thereof – on subordinates’ ‘perception of abusive supervision’ (AS), which is largely overlooked in the domain of AS. The data (213 subordinates across 51 work groups) showed that subordinates’ perception of AS and their feelings of anger, in turn, mediated the deleterious effects of PJC (or a lack thereof) on subordinates’ organisational citizenship behaviours (OCBs). The study contributes to the AS literature by highlighting and investigating PJC, building on understanding around subordinates’ perceptions of AS. Also, by incorporating a two-stage mediating mechanism (stage 1: AS, stage 2: anger), this study investigates the full impact of the cascading effects of AS. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AmbroseMLSchminkeMMayerDM (2013) Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology98: 678–689.
2.
AryeeSLi-YunSZhen XiongC, et al. (2007) Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 191–201.
3.
AryeeSSunLYChenZXG, et al. (2008) Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review4: 393–411.
4.
AshkanasyNMAshton-JamesCE (2005) Emotion in organizations: A neglected topic in I/O psychology, but with a bright future. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology20: 221–268.
5.
AshkanasyNMDausCS (2002) Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. The Academy of Management Executive16: 76–86.
6.
AtwaterLKimKYWittA, et al. (2015) Reactions to abusive supervision: Examining the roles of emotions and gender in the USA. The International Journal of Human Resource Management27: 1–26.
7.
BaschJFisherCD (2000) Affective events-emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. In: AshkanasyNMHartelCEJZerbeWJ (eds) Emotions in the Workplace: Research, Theory, and Practice. Westport, CT: Quorum, pp. 36–48.
8.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
9.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 349–381.
10.
BliesePDHalversonRRSchriesheimCA (2002) Benchmarking multilevel methods in leadership: The articles, the model, and the data set. The Leadership Quarterly13: 3–14.
11.
BordiaPRestubogSLDTangRL (2008) When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology93: 1104–1117.
12.
BrownAAbernethyAGorsuchR, et al. (2010) Sacred violations, perceptions of injustice, and anger in Muslims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology40: 1003–1027.
13.
CarlsonDFergusonMHunterE, et al. (2012) Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. The Leadership Quarterly23: 849–859.
14.
ChanD (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology83: 234–246.
15.
ChristensBDPetersonNASpeerPW (2011) Community participation and psychological empowerment: Testing reciprocal causality using a cross-lagged panel design and latent constructs. Health Education and Behavior38: 339–347.
16.
ColquittJA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology86: 386–400.
17.
ColquittJANoeRAJacksonCL (2002) Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology55: 83–109.
18.
CourtrightSHGardnerRGSmithTA, et al. (2016) My family made me do it: A cross-domain, self-regulatory perspective on antecedents to abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal59: 1630–1652.
19.
DalalRSLamHWeissHM, et al. (2009) A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal52: 1051–1066.
20.
DietzJRobinsonSLFolgerR, et al. (2003) The impact of community violence and an organization’s procedural justice climate on workplace aggression. Academy of Management Journal46: 317–326.
21.
EdwardsMSAshkanasyNMGardnerJ (2009) Deciding to speak up or to remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotions and climate of silence. In: GreenbergJEdwardsM (eds) Voice and Silence in Organizations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 83–109.
22.
ElfenbeinHA (2007) 7 Emotion in organizations: A review and theoretical integration. The Academy of Management Annals1: 315–386.
23.
ErdoganBLidenRC (2006) Collectivism as a moderator of responses to organizational justice: Implications for leader-member exchange and ingratiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior27: 1–17.
24.
FarhCIChenZ (2014) Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology99: 1074–1095.
25.
FisherCD (2000) Mood and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior21: 185–202.
26.
FisherCDAshkanasyNM (2000) The emerging role of emotions in work life: An introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior21: 123–129.
27.
FitnessJ (2000) Anger in the workplace: An emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior21: 147–162.
28.
FolgerR (1993) Reactions to mistreatment at work. In: MurnighanJK (ed.) Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 161–183.
29.
FolgerRCropanzanoR (1998) Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
FordMTWangYJinJ, et al. (2017) Chronic and episodic anger and gratitude toward the organization: Relationships with organizational and supervisor supportiveness and extrarole behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology23: 175–187.
31.
FredricksonBLTugadeMMWaughCE, et al. (2003) What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84: 365–376.
32.
GeorgeJM (1990) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology75: 107–116.
33.
Harmon-JonesE (2004) Contributions from research on anger and cognitive dissonance to understanding the motivational functions of asymmetrical frontal brain activity. Biological Psychology67: 51–76.
34.
Harmon-JonesE (2007) Trait anger predicts relative left frontal cortical activation to anger-inducing stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology66: 154–160.
35.
HarveyPHarrisRBHarrisKJ, et al. (2007) Attenuating the effects of social stress: The impact of political skill. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology12: 105–115.
36.
HooblerJMHuJ (2013) A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly24: 256–269.
37.
IliesRScottBAJudgeTA (2006) The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal49: 561–575.
38.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology69: 85–98.
39.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1993) An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78: 306–309.
40.
KhanS (2015) Abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes: The moderating effects of intimidation and recognition. Journal of General Management41: 61–81.
41.
KiazadKRestubogSLDZagenczykTJ, et al. (2010) In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality44: 512–519.
42.
KirkRE (1982) Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43.
KniesELeisinkP (2014) Linking people management and extra-role behaviour: Results of a longitudinal study. Human Resource Management Journal24: 57–76.
44.
KrayLJLindEA (2002) The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others’ experiences in organizational justice judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes89: 906–924.
45.
KundiM (2006) Causality and the interpretation of epidemiologic evidence. Environmental Health Perspectives114: 969–974.
46.
LazarusRS (1991) Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11: 815–852.
48.
LeeKAllenNJ (2002) Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology87: 131–142.
49.
LiuCYangLQNautaMM (2013) Examining the mediating effect of supervisor conflict on procedural injustice-job strain relations: The function of power distance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology18: 64–74.
50.
MackeyJDFriederREBreesJR, et al. (2017) Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management43: 1940–1965.
51.
MartinkoMJHarveyPBreesJR, et al. (2013) A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior34: S120–S137.
52.
MastersonSS (2001) A trickle-down model of organizational justice: Relating employees’ and customers’ perceptions of and reactions to fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology86: 594–604.
53.
MawritzMBDustSBResickCJ (2014) Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter?Journal of Applied Psychology99: 737–747.
54.
MawritzMBMayerDMHooblerJM, et al. (2012) A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology65: 325–357.
55.
MitchellMSVogelRMFolgerR (2015) Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology100: 1040–1055.
NaumannSEBennettN (2000) A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal43: 881–889.
58.
OrganDW (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
59.
ParkHHooblerJMWuJ, et al. (2019) Abusive supervision and employee deviance: A multifoci justice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics158: 1113–1131.
60.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBPodsakoffNP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology63: 539–569.
61.
PreacherKJZhangZZyphurMJ (2011) Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling18: 161–182.
62.
PreacherKJZyphurMJZhangZ (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods15: 209–233.
63.
PriesemuthMArnaudASchminkeM (2013) Bad behavior in groups: The impact of overall justice climate and functional dependence on counterproductive work behavior in work units. Group and Organization Management38: 230–257.
64.
PriesemuthMSchminkeMAmbroseML, et al. (2014) Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal57: 1513–1534.
65.
RestubogSLDScottKLZagenczykTJ (2011) When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology96: 713–729.
66.
RobinsonSLBennettRJ (1995) A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal38: 555–572.
67.
RobinsonSLO’Leary-KellyAM (1998) Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal41: 658–672.
68.
RuppDEMcCanceASSpencerS, et al. (2008) Customer (in) justice and emotional labor: The role of perspective taking, anger, and emotional regulation. Journal of Management34: 903–924.
69.
SalancikGRPfefferJ (1978) A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly23: 224–253.
70.
ScottWTrostZBernierE, et al. (2013) Anger differentially mediates the relationship between perceived injustice and chronic pain outcomes. Pain®154: 1691–1698.
71.
SigfusdottirIDGudjonssonGHSigurdssonJF (2010) Bullying and delinquency: The mediating role of anger. Personality and Individual Differences48: 391–396.
72.
SimonLSHurstCKelleyK, et al. (2015) Understanding cycles of abuse: A multimotive approach. Journal of Applied Psychology100: 1798–1810.
73.
SkarlickiDPFolgerR (1997) Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology82: 434–443.
74.
SkarlickiDPKulikCT (2004) Third-party reactions to employee (mis)treatment: A justice perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior26: 183–229.
75.
SkarlickiDPRuppDE (2010) Dual processing and organizational justice: The role of rational versus experiential processing in third-party reactions to workplace mistreatment. Journal of Applied Psychology95: 944–952.
76.
SofieldLSalmondSW (2003) Workplace violence: A focus on verbal abuse and intent to leave the organization. Orthopaedic Nursing22: 274–283.
77.
SpectorPEFoxS (2002) An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review12: 269–292.
78.
TepperBJ (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal43: 178–190.
79.
TepperBJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management33: 261–289.
80.
TepperBJDuffyMKHenleCA, et al. (2006) Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology59: 101–123.
81.
TepperBJHenleCALambertLS, et al. (2008) Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology93: 721–732.
82.
TepperBJMossSEDuffyMK (2011) Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal54: 279–294.
83.
TepperBJSimonLParkHM (2017) Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4: 123–152.
84.
TurilloCJFolgerRLavelleJJ, et al. (2002) Is virtue its own reward? Self-sacrificial decisions for the sake of fairness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes89: 839–865.
85.
Van der PloegHM (1988) The factor structure of the State-Trait Anger Scale. Psychological Reports63, 978.
86.
VidyarthiPRLidenRCAnandS, et al. (2010) Where do I stand? Examining the effects of leader-member exchange social comparison on employee work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology95: 849–861.
87.
WaldmanDAYammarinoFJ (1999) CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review24: 266–285.
88.
WatsonDClarkLATellegenA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54: 1063–1070.
89.
WayneSJHooblerJMarinovaSV, et al. (2008) Abusive behavior: Trickle-down effects beyond the dyad. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings2008: 2–6.
90.
WeissHMBealDJ (2005) Reflections on affective events theory. Research on Emotion in Organizations1: 1–21.
91.
WeissHMCropanzanoR (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of affective experiences at work. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 1–74.
92.
WheelerARHalbeslebenJRBWhitmanMV (2013) The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co-worker abuse. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology86: 477–496.
93.
WheelerARShanineKKLeonMR, et al. (2014) Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology87: 1–26.
94.
WhitmanMVHalbeslebenJRBHolmesO (2014) Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior35: 38–53.
95.
WuTYHuC (2009) Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion: Dispositional antecedents and boundaries. Group and Organization Management34: 143–169.
96.
XiaqiDKunTChongsenY, et al. (2012) Abusive supervision and LMX: Leaders’ emotional intelligence as antecedent variable and trust as consequence variable. Chinese Management Studies6: 257–270.
97.
ZellarsKLTepperBJDuffyMK (2002) Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology87: 1068–1076.
98.
ZhangYBednallTC (2016) Antecedents of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics139: 455–471.
99.
ZhaoHWayneSJGlibkowskiBC, et al. (2007) The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology60: 647–680.
