This article analyses the expropriation of workers’ incomes through public debt and taxation, in a fiscal system that is capable, more than of enabling a redistribution of surpluses, of deepening future labour exploitation. Based on recent Brazilian experience, the paper shows that the increase of both public debt and interest on that debt has led to increased taxation, whose burden is eventually levied on workers. Combined with a decrease in state spending on social wages, this has led to an increase in the aggregate rate of labour exploitation, revealing the exploitative character of the state fiscal superstructure.
AlboGEvansB (2010) From rescue strategies to exit strategies: The struggle over public sector austerity. Socialist Register47: 283–308.
2.
AminS (2008) Economia de mercado ou capitalismo financeiro oligopólico. Margem Esquerda12: 62–73.
3.
AppelbaumEBattRClarkI (2013) Implications of financial capitalism for employment relations research: Evidence from breach of trust and implicit contracts in private equity buyouts. British Journal of Industrial Relations51(3): 498–518.
4.
BinD (2014) The class character of macroeconomic policies in Brazil of the real. Critical Sociology40(3): 431–49.
5.
BoitoA (2007) Class relations in Brazil’s new neoliberal phase. Latin American Perspectives34(5): 115–31.
6.
BourdieuP (1997) Le champ économique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales119(1): 48–66.
7.
BowlesSGintisH (1990) Contested exchange: New microfoundations for the political economy of capitalism. Politics & Society18(2): 165–222.
8.
CohenGA (1979) The labor theory of value and the concept of exploitation. Philosophy and Public Affairs8(4): 338–60.
9.
De AngelisM (2004) Separating the doing and the deed: capital and the continuous character of enclosures. Historical Materialism12(2): 57–87.
10.
De OliveiraF (2006) Lula in the labyrinth. New Left Review42: 5–22.
11.
Dos SantosPL (2012) On the content of banking in contemporary capitalism. In LapavitsasC (ed.) Financialization in Crisis. Chicago: Haymarket, pp. 83–118.
12.
DuménilGLévyD (2001) Costs and benefits of neoliberalism. A class analysis. Review of International Political Economy8(4): 578–607.
13.
DuménilGLévyD (2011) The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
DymskiGA (1992) Towards a new model of exploitation: the case of racial domination. International Journal of Social Economics19(7/8/9): 292–313.
15.
FosterJBMagdoffF (2009) The Great Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences. New York: Monthly Review.
16.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
HarveyD (2006) Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.
18.
HarveyD (2010) The Enigma of Capital: and the Crises of Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
HilferdingR (1981 [1910]) Finance Capital: a Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20.
JessopB (2013) Revisiting the regulation approach: critical reflections on the contradictions, dilemmas, fixes and crisis dynamics of growth regimes. Capital & Class37(1): 5–24.
21.
JohnstonJDolowitzDP (1999) Marxism and social class. In GambleAMarshDTantT (eds.) Marxism and Social Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 129–51.
22.
KrippnerGR (2011) Capitalizing on Crisis: the Political Origins of the Rise of Finance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
LapavitsasC (2011) Theorizing financialization. Work, Employment and Society25(4): 611–26.
24.
LapavitsasC (2012) Financialised capitalism: crisis and financial expropriation. In LapavitsasC (ed.) Financialization in Crisis. Chicago: Haymarket, pp. 15–50.
25.
LebowitzMA (2005) Following Marx: Method, Critique, and Crisis. Chicago: Haymarket.
26.
MarxK (1973 [1844]) Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
27.
MarxK (1972 [1850]) The Class Struggles in France, 1848 to 1850. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
28.
MarxK (1971 [1859]) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
PapadatosD (2012) Central banking in contemporary capitalism: Inflation-targeting and financial crises. In LapavitsasC (ed.) Financialization in Crisis. Chicago: Haymarket, pp. 119–41.
32.
PastorMDymskiGA (1991) Debt crisis and class conflict in Latin America. Capital & Class15(1): 203–31.
33.
PoulantzasN (1973) On social classes. New Left ReviewI/78: 27–54.
34.
PoulantzasN (1978) Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso
35.
RadiceH (2010) Confronting the crisis: a class analysis. Socialist Register47: 21–43.
36.
RoemerJE (1982a) New directions in the Marxian theory of exploitation and class. Politics & Society11(3): 253–87.
37.
RoemerJE (1982b) Property relations vs. surplus value in Marxian exploitation. Philosophy and Public Affairs11(4): 281–313.
38.
SalamaP (1998) De la finance à la flexibilité en Amérique latine et en Asie du Nord et du Sud-Est. Revue Tiers Monde39(154): 425–50.
39.
TherbornG (1999) The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Verso.
40.
TherbornG (2008) What does the Ruling Class do When it Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.
41.
VernengoM (2007) Fiscal squeeze and social policy during the Cardoso administration (1995-2002)Latin American Perspectives34(5): 81–91.
42.
WilliamsH (2001) Of free trade and debt bondage: Fighting banks and the state in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives28(4): 30–51.
43.
WilsonHT (2002) Capitalism after Postmodernism: Neo-Conservatism, Legitimacy and the Theory of Public Capital. Leiden: Brill.
44.
WrightEO (1999) Alternative perspectives in Marxist theory of accumulation and crisis. Critical Sociology25(2/3): 111–42.
45.
WrightEO (2000) Class Counts: Student Edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
