Accumulation by transition or genuine transformation? Speculative political ecologies of Central Appalachia’s emerging forest carbon economy

Abstract

As trust in the validity of forest carbon credits decreases, a market for high integrity forest carbon credits is emerging in Central Appalachia, a region known for its vast natural resources and fundamentally shaped by their extraction. This market is also emerging in the context of a just transition away from fossil fuels (just according to whom?) that have historically supported the region’s economy. This paper situates the initial contours and outcomes of the Family Forest Carbon Program, a joint project by The Nature Conservancy and the American Forest Foundation, as either contributing to yet another round of capitalist accumulation – accumulation by transition – or representing an opportunity for genuine socioecological transformation. Utilizing a speculative political ecology approach and a combination of power mapping, archival analysis, site visits, and semi-structured interviews, this paper identifies three themes, or conjunctures, that can be understood as chances to either continue historical patterns of dispossession or potentially disrupt them: addressing histories of unequal land ownership; identifying and avoiding processes of primitive accumulation; and determining who is ultimately benefiting from the forest carbon economy.

Keywords

nature-based climate solutions land-based climate mitigation just transitions carbon offsets voluntary carbon markets

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amazon (2021) Tackling climate change, one forest at a time. Amazon. Available at: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/sustainability/tackling-climate-change-one-forest-at-a-time (accessed 10 June 2025).

American Forest Foundation (2024a) A higher integrity way to buy carbon credits. Family Forest Carbon Program. Available at: https://familyforestcarbon.org/aff-auction-webinar/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign:=webinar_ad1 (accessed 10 June 2025).

American Forest Foundation (2024b) How carbon credit auctions can scale the VCM. Family Forest Carbon Program. Available at: https://familyforestcarbon.org/aff-auction-webinar/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign:=webinar_ad1 (accessed 10 June 2025).

American Forest Foundation (2025) AFF auction demo. Family Forest Carbon Program. Available at: https://familyforestcarbon.org/aff-auction-webinar/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign:=webinar_ad1 (accessed 10 June 2025).

Appalachian Land Ownership Task Force (1983) Who Owns Appalachia? Landownership and Its Impact. The University of Kentucky Press.

Avila-Calero

(2017) Contesting energy transitions: Wind power and conflicts in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Journal of Political Ecology 24(1): 992–1012.

Barratt

Green

(2024) BP-owned company is selling carbon credits on trees that aren’t in danger, analysis finds. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jul/11/finite-carbon-forest-offsets-analysis (accessed 10 June 2025).

Braun

(2015) From critique to experiment? Rethinking political ecology for the Anthropocene. In: Perreault

Bridge

McCarthy

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Routledge, pp.102–114.

Bridge

(2011) Resource geographies 1: Making carbon economies, old and new. Progress in Human Geography 36(6): 820–824.

10.

Bridge

McCarthy

Perrault

(2015) Editors’ introduction. In: Perreault

Bridge

McCarthy

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Routledge, pp.3–18.

11.

Bryant

(2019) Carbon Markets in a Climate-Changing Capitalism. Cambridge University Press.

12.

Camargo

(2021) Is health a just transition issue? Cross-cutting multiple crisis: Economic, unemployment, climate and healthcare. In: Fihlo

Vidal

Dinis

MAP

, et al. (eds) Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research. Springer, pp.609–623.

13.

Carbon Pulse (2025) Finite Carbon hit by mass layoffs as new owner restructures operations. Carbon Pulse. Available at: https://carbon-pulse.com/376442/ (accessed 9 June 2025).

14.

Coyne

(2025) ‘It will destroy this place:’ Tucker County residents fight for future against proposed data center. West Virginia Watch. Available at: https://westvirginiawatch.com/2025/05/28/it-will-destroy-this-place-tucker-county-residents-fight-for-future-against-proposed-data-center/ (accessed 14 September 2025).

15.

Cumming

Hawkins

Sminchak

, et al. (2019) Researching candidate sites for a carbon storage complex in the Central Appalachian Basin, USA. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 88: 168–181.

16.

Dalton

Mason-Deese

(2012) Counter (mapping) actions: Mapping as militant research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 11(3): 439–466.

17.

Disney (2025) Natural climate solutions. Disney. Available at: https://impact.disney.com/environmental-sustainability/natural-climate-solutions/ (accessed 10 June 2025).

18.

Dombrowski

(2023) Reforesting mine lands through the carbon market. Appalachian Voices. Available at: https://appvoices.org/new-economy/carbon-removal-paper/ (accessed 9 June 2025).

19.

Ekers

Prudham

(2017) The socioecological fix: Fixed capital, metabolism, and hegemony. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 108(1): 17–34.

20.

Eller

(1982) Miners, Millhands, and Mountaineers: Industrialization of the Appalachian South, 1880-1930. University of Tennessee Press.

21.

Family Forest Carbon Program (2025) Homepage. Family Forest Carbon Program. Available at: https://familyforestcarbon.org/ (accessed 9 June 2025).

22.

Fearn

(2024) The end of the experiment? The energy crisis, neoliberal energy, and the limits to a socio-ecological fix. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 7(1): 212–223.

23.

Finite Carbon (2025) Rowland Land Company. Finite Carbon. Available at: https://www.finitecarbon.com/projects/rowland-land-company/ (accessed 10 June 2025).

24.

Ford

(2024) Subsurface power: How mineral rights are hidden and how to uncover them. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 23(5): 338–355.

25.

Gabbatiss

Pearson

(2023) Analysis: How some of the world’s largest companies rely on carbon offsets to ‘reach net-zero.’ Carbon Brief. Available at: https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/carbon-offsets-2023/companies.html (accessed 10 June 2025).

26.

Gilmore

(2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. University of California Press.

27.

Harris

McCarthy

(2020) Revisiting power and powerlessness: Speculating on West Virginia’s energy future and the externalities of the socioecological fix. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4(3): 915–939.

28.

Harris

McCarthy

(2023) A just transition to what, for whom, and by what means? Transition technology, carbon markets, and an Appalachian coal mine. Energy Research & Social Science 106: 103307.

29.

Harris

Mullenite

(2024) Ruins and ruination in political ecology: An introduction to the special issue. Capitalism Nature Socialism 35(1): 4–11.

30.

Harris

Santos

(2023) A case for experimental and speculative political ecologies. Journal of Political Ecology 30(1): 524–541.

31.

Harvey

(2001) Globalization and the ‘spatial fix’. Geographische Revue 8: 23–30.

32.

Harvey

(2004) The new imperialism: Accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Regsiter 40: 63–87.

33.

Heffron

McCauley

(2018) What is the ‘just transition’? Geoforum 88: 74–77.

34.

Holliman

Collins

(2023) California’s cap-and-trade program: Is it effective in advancing social, economic, and environmental equity? Public Administration and Policy 26(2): 128–141.

35.

Kaiser

(2025) Who are the largest institutional landowners in the U.S.? LandApp. Available at: https://www.landapp.com/post/largest-institutional-landowners-in-the-us (accessed 10 June 2025).

36.

Kaljonen

Kortetmäki

Tribaldos

(2023) Introduction to the special issue on just food system transition: Tackling inequalities for sustainability. Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions 46: 100688.

37.

Karplus

Iacob

Moore

, et al. (2024) Risks in the design of regional hydrogen hub systems: A review and commentary. Risk Analysis 45(3): 581–599.

38.

Kay

(2017a) A hostile takeover of nature? Placing value in conservation finance. Antipode 50(1): 164–183.

39.

Kay

(2017b) Rural rentierism and the financial enclosure of main’s open lands tradition. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(6): 1407–1423.

40.

Kinchy

Lehman

(2025) Not your grandpa’s energy system? Fossil fuel inheritances in the decarbonization of industrial geographies. Energy Research & Social Science 127: 104238.

41.

Lakhani

(2023) ‘Worthless’: Chevron’s carbon offsets are mostly junk and some may harm, research says. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/may/24/chevron-carbon-offset-climate-crisis#:~:text=New%20research%20by%20Corporate%20Accountability,anything%20other%20than%20worthless%20or (accessed 10 June 2025).

42.

Lane

Newell

(2016) The political economy of carbon markets. In: Van de Graaf

Sovacool

Ghosh

, et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. Palgrave Macmillan, pp.247–267.

43.

Lewin

(1931) The history of government property in minerals in the United States. St. Louis Law Review. 245. Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol16/iss3/8/ (accessed 12 October 2025).

44.

(2024) The politics of just transition: Authoritarian environmentalism and implementation flexibility in forest conservation. Political Geography 109: 103066.

45.

Loperena

(2017) Settler violence?: Race and emergent frontiers of progress in Honduras. American Quarterly 69(4): 801–807.

46.

McCarthy

(2015) A socioecological fix to capitalist crisis and climate change? The possibilities and limits of renewable energy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 47(12): 2485–2502.

47.

McEnally to Willey (1864) Waitman T Willey Papers. Box 2, Folder 11 – 578. West Virginia & Regional History Center at West Virginia University.

48.

Malm

(2016) Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso.

49.

Martin

(2023) AFF announces new strategic direction. Woodland: A Publication of the American Forest Foundation 11(1): 6–7.

50.

Marx

(1990) Capital Volume I. Penguin Classics.

51.

Mason

Sarma

Sidaway

, et al. (2023) Interventions in walking methods in political geography. Political Geography 106: 102937.

52.

Microsoft (2024) Corporate Social Responsibility – Carbon dioxide removal. Microsoft/Way Back Machine. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20240702073840/https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sustainability/carbon-removal-program (accessed 10 June 2025).

53.

Mills

(2013) Cultural-historical geographies of the archive: Fragments, objects and ghosts. Geography Compass 7(10): 701–713.

54.

Newell

Boykoff

Boyd

(2012) The New Carbon Economy: Constitution, Governance and Contestation. Wiley-Blackwell.

55.

Newell

Mulvaney

(2013) The political economy of the ‘just transition’. The Geographical Journal 179(2): 132–140.

56.

Nichols

(1962) Real property taxation of divided interests. University of Kansas Law Review 11: 309.

57.

Patel

Moore

(2018) A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things: A Guide to Capitalism, Nature, and the Future of the Planet. University of California Press.

58.

Payne

(2016) Owning the mountains: Appalachia’s history of corporate control. The Appalachian Voice. Available at: https://appvoices.org/2016/02/18/corporate-land-ownership-appalachia/ (accessed 7 June 2025).

59.

Procton

(2024) State of the Voluntary Carbon Market 2024. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. Washington DC: Forest Trends Association.

60.

Ridder

(2020) A just transition for coal communities. The Appalachian Voice. Available at: https://appvoices.org/2020/02/25/a-just-transition-for-coal-communities/ (accessed 7 June 2025).

61.

Righetti

(2020) Liberating split estates. International Journal of the Commons 14(1): 638–649.

62.

Rignall

(2015) Solar power, state power, and politics of energy transition in pre-Saharan Morocco. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48(3): 540–557.

63.

Robertson

(2012) Measurement and alienation: Making a world of ecosystem services. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37(3): 386–401.

64.

Robertson

BenDor

Lave

, et al. (2014) Stacking ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12(3): 186–193.

65.

Robertson

(2004) The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35(3): 361–373.

66.

Rosemberg

(2013) Developing global environmental union policies through the International Trade Union Confederation. In: Räthzel

Uzzel

(eds) Trade Unions in the Green Economy. Routledge, pp.15–28.

67.

Rusca

Harris

Santos

(2024) Experimental and speculative political ecologies for an age of crisis, hope, and action. Progress in Environmental Geography 3(4): 374–395.

68.

Saito

(2021) Primitive accumulation as the cause of economic and ecological disaster. In: Musto

(ed.) Rethinking Alternatives with Mark. Palgrave MacMillan, pp.93–112.

69.

Savage

(2021) Repairing the damage: The costs of delaying reclamation at modern-era mines. Appalachian Voices. Available at: https://appvoices.org/resources/RepairingTheDamage_ReclamationAtModernMines.pdf (accessed 14 September 2025).

70.

Savage

Shelton

Cromer

(2025) Delayed coal mine reclamation in Kentucky. Appalachian Citizens’ Law Center. Available at: https://aclc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Reclamation-Report-feb-2025.pdf (accessed 12 October 2025).

71.

Schept

(2022) Coal, Cages, Crisis: The Rise of the Prison Economy in Central Appalachia. New York University Press.

72.

Schramm

(2023) Examining the role of minor experiments in French and Catalan eco-communities: Between critique and post-capitalist world-building. Journal of Political Ecology 30(1): 558–580.

73.

Schwartzman

(2022) Climate rentierism after coal: Forests, carbon offsets, and post-coal politics in the Appalachian coalfields. The Journal of Peasant Studies 49(5): 924–944.

74.

Scott

(2010) Removing Mountains: Extracting Nature and Identity in the Appalachian Coalfields. University of Minnesota Press.

75.

Scott

(2008) The Appalachian land ownership study revisited. Appalachian Journal 35(3): 236–252.

76.

Shade

Van Sant

(2023) Geographies of land ownership change in the rural United States: Challenges, methods, and possibilities. The Professional Geographer 75(5): 844–854.

77.

Slovinsky

Johnson

(2025) LiKEN Martin County Land Study, ASA Draft edn. LiKEN Knowledge.

78.

Sovacool

Dunlap

Novaković

(2025) When decarbonization reinforces colonization: Complex energy injustice and solar development in the California desert. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 115(3): 640–670.

79.

Suell

(2022) The creation of capitalist time: Rethinking primitive accumulation through conservation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 40(5): 881–899.

80.

Ternes

Mardsen

Harrison

(2024) A just transition or just a transition? The understanding and relevance of fairness in planning for a decarbonised transport system. Energy Research & Social Science 113: 103549.

81.

The Nature Conservancy (2025) Conserving the Appalachians. The Nature Conservancy. Available at: https://www.wyomingnews.com/news/local_news/laramie-county-landowners-collaborate-to-store-carbon-emissions-underground/article_c3ed90ba-ae7c-11ef-a602-e35ded93531b.html (accessed 10 June 2025).

82.

Thomas

(2021) Framing the just transition: How international trade unions engage with climate negotiations. Global Environmental Change 70: 102347.

83.

Thompson

(1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act. Penguin Books.

84.

van den Bold

(2021) In pursuit of diverse energy futures: The political economy of electricity in Senegal. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 5(4) 1807–1830.

85.

Verra (2023) Verra releases version 4.5 of the VCS Standard. Verra. Available at: https://verra.org/verra-releases-version-4-5-of-the-vcs-standard/ (accessed 9 June 2025).

86.

Verra (2024) Verra releases version 4.6 of the VCS Standard. Verra. Available at: https://verra.org/verra-releases-version-4-6-of-the-vcs-standard/ (accessed 9 June 2025).

87.

Wang

(2021) Just transition: A conceptual review. Energy Research & Social Science 82: 102291.

88.

Weise

(1995) Property, gender, and the sale of mineral rights in pre-industrial Eastern Kentucky. Journal of Appalachian Studies 7: 79–90. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41445682 (accessed 12 October 2025).

89.

West Virginia Center on Budget & Policy (2013) Who owns West Virginia? WVCBP. Available at: https://wvpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/5/land-study-paper-final3.pdf (accessed 7 June 2025).

90.

West Virginia Legislature (2024a) Senate Bill 822. West Virginia Legislature 2024 Regular Session. Available at: https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=sb822%20intr.htm&yr=2024&sesstype=RS&i=822 (accessed 7 June 2025).

91.

West Virginia Legislature (2024b) Senate Bill 618. West Virginia Legislature 2024 Regular Session. Available at: http://www.legis.state.wv.us/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=sb618%20intr.htm&yr=2025&sesstype=RS&i=618 (accessed 7 June 2025).

92.

West Virginia Legislature (2025a) Senate Bill 107. West Virginia Legislature 2025 Regular Session. Available at: https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=sb107%20intr.htm&yr=2025&sesstype=RS&i=107 (accessed 7 June 2025).

93.

West Virginia Legislature (2025b) Senate Bill 730. West Virginia Legislature 2025 Regular Session. Available at: https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=sb730%20intr.htm&yr=2025&sesstype=RS&i=730 (accessed 7 June 2025).

94.

West Virginia Supreme Court (2021) Pocahontas Surface Interests LLC, et al v. Appalachian Forests A, LLC, et al. West Virginia Judiciary. Available at: https://www.courtswv.gov/lower-courts/business-court-division/case-search/case/20-C-49-mcd (accessed 7 June 2025).

95.

White

(2020) Just transitions/design for transitions: Preliminary notes on a design politics for a green new deal. Capitalism Nature Socialism 31(2): 20–39.

96.

Young

(2021) White House climate advisor sees a path to a clean energy transition through coal country. Available at: https://woub.org/2021/04/08/white-house-climate-advisor-sees-a-path-to-a-clean-energy-transition-through-coal-country/ (accessed 10 June 2025).

97.

Zografos

Robbins

(2020) Green sacrifice zones, or why a green new deal cannot ignore the cost shifts of just transitions. One Earth 3(5): 543–546.