Does living in an area characterized by high concentrations of residents of the same country-of-origin deprive ethnic minority groups, or does potential access to an extended country-of-origin-specific network stimulate their integration? This paper takes a new approach to analysing the potential of country-of-origin-specific economic capital in neighbourhoods to increase employment opportunities. We add to the ‘ethnic enclave’ debate by measuring country-of-origin-specific economic capital as the rate of employed co-countrymen, while controlling for the presence of co-countrymen and general employment rates in the neighbourhood. Whereas many studies employ aggregated data to estimate the impact of neighbourhood, here we use individualized, scalable neighbourhoods. This allows for a flexible approach in studying the impact of country-of-origin-specific economic capital in neighbourhoods. We employ individual longitudinal Swedish registry data for 2000–2010 on working-age individuals of Iraqi, Iranian, Turkish, and Somalian backgrounds in Stockholm, Göteborg, and Malmö. We find that an increased share of employed co-countrymen positively influences individual employment prospects. We add to existing knowledge by showing that the impact of minority clustering on employment outcomes is conditional on the quality of local networks – i.e., country-of-origin-specific economic capital – and on the scale of measurement.
AlbaRDLoganJRStultsBJ, et al. (1999)
Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review64(3): 446–460.
2.
AnderssonLHammarstedtM (2015)
Ethnic enclaves, networks and self-employment among Middle Eastern immigrants in Sweden. International Migration53(6): 27–40.
3.
AnderssonEKMalmbergB (2015)
Contextual effects on educational attainment in individualised, scalable neighbourhoods: Differences across gender and social class. Urban Studies52(12): 2117–2133.
4.
AnderssonEKMalmbergB (2018)
Segregation and the effects of adolescent residential context on poverty risks and early income career: A study of the Swedish 1980 cohort. Urban Studies55(2): 365–383.
5.
AnderssonRMusterdS (2010)
What scale matters? Exploring the relationships between individuals’ social position, neighbourhood context and the scale of neighbourhood. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography92(1): 23–43.
6.
AnderssonRMusterdSGalsterG (2014)
Neighbourhood ethnic composition and employment effects on immigrant incomes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(5): 710–736.
7.
AnderssonRMusterdSGalsterG (2019)
Port-of-entry neighborhood and its effects on the economic success of refugees in Sweden. International Migration Review53(3): 671–705.
8.
ÅslundOHensvikLSkansON (2014)
Seeking similarity: How immigrants and natives manage in the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics32(3): 405–441.
9.
BeamanLA (2012)
Social networks and the dynamics of labour market outcomes: Evidence from refugees resettled in the U.S. The Review of Economic Studies79(1): 128–161.
10.
BlossfeldH-PDrobnicS (2001) Careers of Couples in Contemporary Society: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
11.
BorjasGJ (1992)
Ethnic capital and intergenerational mobility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics107(1): 123–150.
12.
BorjasGJ (1995)
Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human capital externalities. The American Economic Review85(3): 365–390.
13.
BorjasGJ (1998)
To ghetto or not to ghetto: Ethnicity and residential segregation. Journal of Urban Economics44(2): 228–253.
14.
CarlssonMRoothD-O (2007)
Evidence of ethnic discrimination in the Swedish labor market using experimental data. Labour Economics14(4): 716–729.
15.
ClarkWVAveryKL (1976)
The effects of data aggregation in statistical analysis. Geographical Analysis8(4): 428–438.
16.
DammAP (2009)
Ethnic enclaves and immigrant labor market outcomes: Quasi‐experimental evidence. Journal of Labor Economics27(2): 281–314.
17.
DinesenPTSønderskovKM (2015)
Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context. American Sociological Review80(3): 550–573.
18.
EdinP-AFredrikssonPÅslundO (2003)
Ethnic enclaves and the economic success of immigrants – Evidence from a natural experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics118(1): 329–357.
19.
FotheringhamASWongDWS (1991)
The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space23(7): 1025–1044.
20.
FowlerCS (2018)
Key assumptions in multiscale segregation measures: How zoning and strength of spatial association condition outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science45(6): 1055–1072.
21.
GalsterGC (2008)
Quantifying the effect of neighbourhood on individuals: Challenges, alternative approaches, and promising directions. Schmollers Jahrbuch128(1): 7–48.
22.
GranovetterM (1983)
The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1: 201–233.
23.
GranovetterMS (1977) The strength of weak ties. In: Social Networks. New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 347–367.
24.
GrönqvistH (2006)
Ethnic enclaves and the attainments of immigrant children. European Sociological Review22(4): 369–382.
25.
GrünfeldF (1970) Habitat and Habitation: A Pilot Study.
Warlingham:
Samson.
26.
HammarstedtMShukurG (2007)
Immigrants’ relative earnings in Sweden – A quantile regression approach. International Journal of Manpower28(6): 456–473.
27.
HedbergCTammaruT (2012)
Neighbourhood effects’ and ‘city effects’: The entry of newly arrived immigrants into the labour market. Urban Studies50(6): 1165–1182.
28.
HedmanLManleyDvan HamM, et al. (2015)
Cumulative exposure to disadvantage and the intergenerational transmission of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography15(1): 195–215.
29.
HellevikO (2009)
Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity43(1): 59–74.
30.
JacksonEButlerT (2015)
Revisiting ‘social tectonics’: The Middle classes and social mix in gentrifying neighbourhoods. Urban Studies52(13): 2349–2365.
31.
JargowskyPA (2009)
Immigrants and neighbourhoods of concentrated poverty: Assimilation or stagnation?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(7): 1129–1151.
32.
JohnstonRONPropperCBurgessS, et al. (2005)
Spatial scale and the neighbourhood effect: Multinomial models of voting at two recent British general elections. British Journal of Political Science35(3): 487–514.
33.
KanasA (2011) The Economic Performance of Immigrants. The Role of Human and Social Capital. Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
34.
KlinthällMUrbanS (2016)
The strength of ethnic ties: Routes into the labour market in spaces of segregation. Urban Studies53(1): 3–16.
35.
KropkoJKubinecR (2020)
Interpretation and identification of within-unit and cross-sectional variation in panel data models. PLoS ONE15(4): e0231349.
36.
Le GrandCSzulkinR (2002)
Permanent disadvantage or gradual integration: Explaining the immigrant–native earnings gap in Sweden. Labour16(1): 37–64.
37.
LeventhalTBrooks-GunnJ (2003)
Moving to opportunity: An experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Public Health93(9): 1576–1582.
38.
LiuCYChenJLiH (2019)
Linking migrant enclave residence to employment in urban China: The case of shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs41(2): 189–205.
39.
ManhicaHÖsthJRostilaM (2015)
Dynamics of unemployment duration among African migrants in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Migration Research5(4): 194.
40.
ManleyD (2014) Scale, aggregation, and the modifiable areal unit problem. In: FischerMMNijampP (eds) Handbook of Regional Science.
Heidelberg:
Springer, pp. 1157–1171.
41.
ManleyDvan HamM (2012) Neighbourhood effects, housing tenure and individual employment outcomes. In: van HamMManleyDBaileyN (eds) Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives.
Dordrecht:
Springer, pp. 147–174.
42.
ManleyDvan HamMDohertyJ (2012) Social mixing as a cure for negative neighbourhood effects: Evidence-based policy or urban myth?. In: BridgeGButlerTLeesL (eds) Mixed Communities: Gentrification by Stealth?.
Bristol:
Policy Press, pp. 151–168.
43.
MasseyDSDentonNA (1985)
Spatial assimilation as a socioeconomic outcome. American Sociological Review50(1): 94–106.
44.
MusterdS (2003)
Segregation and integration: A contested relationship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies29(4): 623–641.
45.
MusterdS (forthcoming) Segregation, neighbourhood effects, and social mix policies. In: KazepovYBarberisECuccaR (eds) Handbook of Social Policy.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar Publishing.
46.
MusterdSAnderssonRGalsterG, et al. (2008)
Are immigrants’ earnings influenced by the characteristics of their neighbours?Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space40(4): 785–805.
47.
MusterdSVan GentWPCDasM, et al. (2016)
Adaptive behaviour in urban space: Residential mobility in response to social distance. Urban Studies53(2): 227–246.
48.
OECD (2018) Working together for local integration of migrants and refugees.
49.
OECD/European Union (2016) How are refugees faring in the labour market in Europe?
50.
OpenshawS (1984) The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography.
Norwich:
Geobooks.
51.
ÖsthJ (2014) Introducing the EquiPop software – an application for the calculation of k-nearest neighbour contexts/neighbourhoods. Available from url: http://equipop.kultgeog.uu.se
52.
ÖsthJClarkWVMalmbergB (2015)
Measuring the scale of segregation using k-nearest neighbor aggregates. Geographical Analysis47(1): 34–49.
53.
ÖsthJMalmbergBAnderssonEK (2014) Analysing segregation using individualised neighbourhoods. In: LloydCDShuttleworthIWongDWS (eds) Social-Spatial Segregation : Concepts, Processes and Outcomes.
Bristol:
Policy Press, pp. 135–162.
54.
ÖsthJTürkU (2020) Integrating infrastructure and accessibility in measures of bespoke neighbourhoods. In: MusterdS (ed.) Handbook of Urban Segregation.
Cheltenham:
Edward Elgar, pp. 378–394.
55.
PatacchiniEZenouY (2012)
Ethnic networks and employment outcomes. Regional Science and Urban Economics42(6): 938–949.
56.
PinksterFM (2007)
Localised social networks, socialisation and social mobility in a low-income neighbourhood in The Netherlands. Urban Studies44(13): 2587–2603.
57.
PortesABachRL (1985) Latin Journey: Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
58.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
59.
SampsonRJMorenoffJDGannon-RowleyT (2002)
Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 443–478.
60.
SluiterRTolsmaJScheepersP (2015)
At which geographic scale does ethnic diversity affect intra-neighborhood social capital?Social Science Research54: 80–95.
61.
TopaG (2001)
Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies68(2): 261–295.
62.
TürkUÖsthJ (2017) Inequality of opportunity in Sweden: A spatial perspective. University of Verona Department of Economics Working Paper
9.
63.
UrbanS (2009)
Is the neighbourhood effect an economic or an immigrant issue? A study of the importance of the childhood neighbourhood for future integration into the labour market. Urban Studies46(3): 583–603.
64.
UslanerEM (2012) Segregation and Mistrust: Diversity, Isolation, and Social Cohesion.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
65.
Van der Laan Bouma-DoffW (2007)
Involuntary isolation: Ethnic preferences and residential segregation. Journal of Urban Affairs29(3): 289–309.
66.
Van GentWDasMMusterdS (2019)
Sociocultural, economic and ethnic homogeneity in residential mobility and spatial sorting among couples. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space51(4): 891–912.
67.
Van HamMManleyD (2010)
The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix on labour market outcomes: A longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography10(2): 257–282.
68.
Van HamMManleyD (2012)
Neighbourhood effects research at a crossroads. Ten challenges for future research introduction. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space44(12): 2787–2793.
69.
Van HamMManleyDBaileyN, et al. (2012). Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. In: van HamMManleyDBaileyN, et al. (eds) Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives.
Dordrecht:
Springer Netherlands, pp. 1–21.
70.
VogiazidesL (2018)
Exiting distressed neighbourhoods: The timing of spatial assimilation among international migrants in Sweden. Population, Space and Place24(8): e2169.
71.
VogiazidesLMondaniH (2019)
A geographical path to integration? Exploring the interplay between regional context and labour market integration among refugees in Sweden. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(1): 23–23.
72.
WeinbergBReaganPBYankowJJ (2004)
Do neighborhoods affect work behavior? Evidence from the NLSY79. Journal of Labor Economics22(4): 891–924.
73.
WilsonWJ (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged : The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
74.
WilsonWJ (1997) When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor.
New York, NY:
Vintage.
75.
WimarkTHaandrikmanKNielsenMM (2019)
Migrant labour market integration: The association between initial settlement and subsequent employment and income among migrants. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography101(2): 118–137.
76.
ZhouMINPortesA (1992) Chinatown: The Socioeconomic Potential of an Urban Enclave.
Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
