Urban park designers have long championed the social underpinnings of their work. Of late, however, certain landscape practitioners have articulated a more explicit connection between park design and social objectives, arguing that the fundamental role of urban parks is to foster equity and justice. Drawing on Marxian geographer David Harvey’s notion of the geographical imagination, this paper interrogates the relationship between parks and social processes by exploring the role that social issues have historically played in urban park design and by unpacking the prevailing imaginaries of social justice landscape architects and designers have employed in contemporary urban park projects. In doing so, it juxtaposes the lofty rhetoric of designing for social justice against the material reality of development-driven urban regeneration. In this way, the geographic imaginary provides a framework for understanding the limited capacity of urban park design to address broader social issues, even as it offers a mechanism for conceiving and articulating alternatives that more completely address the conditions through which social injustice occurs.
BurnhamD (1921) The commercial value of beauty. In: MooreC (ed.) Daniel Hudson Burnham: Architect, Planner of Cities II, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 101–102.
5.
BurnsRDirector (1999) New York: A Documentary Film. Episode Two, Order and Disorder (1825–1865). United States: PBS.
6.
CampkinB (2013) Remaking London: Decline and Regeneration in Urban Culture, London and New York: I.B. Taurus.
7.
CastoriadisC (1987) The Imaginary Institution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
CornerJ (2006) Terra fluxus. In: WaldheimC (ed.) Landscape Urbanism Reader, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 21–33.
9.
CranzG (1982) The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
CruzTFormanF (2016) Public imagination, citizenship and an urgent call. The Just City Essays1: 39–42.
GutmanM (2007) Equipping the public realm: Rethinking Robert Moses and recreation. In: BallonHJacksonK (eds) Robert Moses and the Modern City: The Transformation of New York, New York and London: W.W. Norton, pp. 72–83.
LarsonS (2013) Building Like Moses With Jacobs in Mind: Contemporary Planning in New York City, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
23.
LarsonS (2017) A High Line for Queens? Celebrating diversity or displacing it? In: LinderCRosaB (eds) Deconstructing the High Line: Postindustrial Urbanism and the Rise of the Elevated Park, New Brunswick, Camden and Trenton: N.J. Rutgers University Press, pp. 169–184.
24.
Lees L (2004) ‘The Emancipatory City’: (Re)Visions. In: Lees L (ed) The Emancipatory City? Possibilities and Paradoxes. London: SAGE Publications.
25.
Lefebvre H (1991) The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
26.
Lefebvre H (1996) Writings on Cities. Translated and edited by Eleonore Kaufman and Elizabeth Lebas. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
WaldheimC (2006) Landscape Urbanism Reader, New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
38.
ZukinSBaskervilleRGreenbergMet al.(1998) From Coney Island to Las Vegas in the urban imaginary: Discursive practices of growth and decline. Urban Affairs Review33(5): 627–654.
