The ‘comparative tableau of mountains and rivers’ is a recently ‘rediscovered’ cartographic layout, aiming to illustrate the size distributions of the world's highest mountains and longest rivers. Its ‘river’ component is basically a barplot of the rivers’ unbent shapes, retaining a ‘thick’ cartographic description of their immediate hinterland. This display was a common feature of French and Anglo-American atlases during most of the 19th century, before it fell totally into disfavour, supplanted by more watershedcentred approaches. The paper is a critical assessment of the design principles of this visualization, via a modern emulation based on generic GIS rubbersheeting algorithms. A recreation of the chart of the world's longest rivers allows for a showcasing of the characteristics of the layout, its intellectual framing, and its political uses. Beyond a discussion of the approach's limitations, its innovative merits are demonstrated with two mapping applications on the evolution of landcover and administrative zonings alongside the Garonne River (southwest France), highlighting complex relationships of human societies along the streams of ‘their’ rivers.
BaillyJ-CBesseJ-MPalskyG (2014) Le monde sur une feuille. Les tableaux comparatifs de montagnes et de fleuves dans les atlas du XIXe siècle, Lyon: Fage Éditions
2.
BassettT JPorterP W (1991) “ ‘From the best authorities’: the Mountains of Kong in the cartography of West Africa”. The Journal of African History32: 367–413
3.
BennettRKitchingmanALeachJ (2010) “On the nature and utility of natural boundaries for land and marine administration”. Land Use Policy27: 772–779
4.
BensteadJ PLeighD S (2012) “An expanded role for river networks”. Nature Geoscience5: 678–679
5.
BlomquistWSchlagerE (2005) “Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management”. Society and Natural Resources18: 101–117
6.
BouleauG (2014) “The co-production of science and waterscapes: the case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France”. Geoforum57: 248–257
7.
Brosz J, Nacenta M A, Pusch R, Carpendale S, Hurter C, 2013, “Transmogrification: casual manipulation of visualizations”, in Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Association for Computing Machinery, New York) pp 97-106
Bulla (1826) Tableau comparatif des principales montagnes, des principaux fleuves et cataractes de la Terre d'après les observations des plus savants voyageurs, Paris: Chez Bulla et Fontanaengraving by Lallemande, http://cartotecadigital.icc.cat
11.
BurghardtD (2005) “Controlled line smoothing by snakes”. GeoInformatica9: 237–252
12.
ColtonJ H (1864) Johnson's New Illustrated Family Atlas with Physical Geography, New York: Johnson and Ward, pp. 10–11
13.
ContosJTripcevichN (2014) “Correct placement of the most distant source of the Amazon River in the Mantaro River drainage”. Area46: 27–39
14.
CramptonJ W (2001) “Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization”. Progress in Human Geography25: 235–252
15.
DewdneyS H (1975) The Sacred Scrolls of the Southern Ojibway, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
16.
DumontH J (2009) “A description of the Nile Basin, and a synopsis of its history, ecology, biogeography, hydrology, and natural resources”. In: DumontH J (eds) The Nile, Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–21
17.
EdneyM H (1993) “Cartography without ‘progress’: reinterpreting the nature and historical development of mapmaking”. Cartographica30: 54–68
18.
FallJ J (2010) “Artificial states? On the enduring geographical myth of natural borders”. Political Geography29: 140–147
19.
FernandezS (2014) “Much ado about minimum flows … unpacking indicators to reveal water politics”. Geoforum57: 258–271
20.
GardnerW R (1823) New and Improved View of the Comparative Heights of the Principal Mountains and Lengths of the Principal Rivers In The World, The whole Judiciously arranged from the various Authorities Extant, William Dart
21.
GaudioM (2000) “Matthew Paris and the Cartography of the Margins”. Gesta50–57
22.
Gillman D, 1985, “Triangulations for rubber sheeting”, in Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Computer Assisted Cartography (AutoCarto 7) ACSM/ASP, Falls Church, VA pp 191-199
23.
Global Runoff Data Centre (2007) “Major river basins of the world”, KoblenzGlobal Runoff Data Centre, Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG)
24.
GuilbertESauxE (2008) “Cartographic generalisation of lines based on a B-spline snake model”. International Journal of Geographical Information Science22: 847–870
25.
Haines-Young R, Weber J-L, 2006, “Land accounts for Europe 1990-2000: towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting”, EEA Report 11, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
26.
JanskýBEngelZKocumJŠefrnaLČesákJ (2011) “The Amazon River headstream area in the Cordillera Chila, Peru: hydrographic, hydrological and glaciological conditions”. Hydrological Sciences Journal56: 138–151
27.
JarvisAReuterH INelsonAGuevaraE (2008) “Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4”. available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database, http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org
28.
JealT (2011) Explorers of the Nile: The Triumph and Tragedy of a Great Victorian Adventure, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
29.
JennyBHurniL (2011) “Studying cartographic heritage: analysis and visualization of geometric distortions”. Computers and Graphics35: 402–411
KennellyP (2012) “Cross-hatched shadow line maps”. The Cartographic Journal49: 135–142
32.
KitchinRDodgeM (2007) “Rethinking maps”. Progress in Human Geography31: 331–344
33.
KonvitzJ W (1990) “The nation-state, Paris and cartography in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century France”. Journal of Historical Geography16: 3–16
34.
KummuMde MoelHWardP JVarisO (2011) “How close do we live to water? A global analysis of population distance to freshwater bodies”. PLoS ONE6: e20578
35.
LehnerBGrillG (2013) “Global river hydrography and network routing: baseline data and new approaches to study the world's large river systems”. Hydrological Processes27: 2171–2186
36.
LehnerBVerdinKJarvisA (2008) “New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data”. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union89: 93–94
37.
LehnerB (2011) “High-resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment9: 494–502
38.
Le LayY-F (2008) “Le Mississippi d'Élisée Reclus: donner du sens aux eaux courantes”. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec52: 215–228
39.
LewisG M (1998) “Maps, mapmaking, and map use by Native North Americans”. In: WoodwardDLewisG M (eds) The History of Cartography. Volume Two, Book Three: Cartography in The Traditional African, American, Arctic, Australian, And Pacific Societies, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 51–182
40.
LintonJ (2008) “Is the hydrologic cycle sustainable? A historical-geographical critique of a modern concept”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers98: 630–649
41.
LiuSLuPLiuDJinPWangW (2009) “Pinpointing the sources and measuring the lengths of the principal rivers of the world”. International Journal of Digital Earth2: 80–87
42.
MacEachrenA MJohnsonG B (1987) “The evolution, application and implications of strip format travel maps”. The Cartographic Journal24: 147–158
43.
MolleF (2009) “River-basin planning and management: the social life of a concept”. Geoforum40: 484–494
44.
MowerJ E (2009) “Automating landscape illustration with pen and ink style rendering”. Cartography and Geographic Information Science36: 117–128
Ochagach, Gaultier de Varennes P (de La Vérendrye), 1754, “Réduction de la carte tracée par le Sauvage Ochagach et autres, laquelle a donné lieu aux Découvertes des Officiers François représentées dans la carte cy-jointe”, in Considerations Géographiques et Physiques sur les nouvelles découvertes au nord de la Grande Mer, appelée vulgairement la Mer du Sud avec des Cartes qui y sont relatives Ed. P Buache (Impr. de Ballard) page 146; W H Pugsley Collection of Early Canadian Maps, McGill University
RegnauldNMackanessW AHartG (2002) “Automated relief representation for visualisation of archaeological monuments and other anthropogenic forms”. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems26: 219–239
50.
RuizJ JArizaF JUreñaM ABlázquezE B (2011) “Digital map conflation: a review of the process and a proposal for classification”. International Journal of Geographical Information Science25: 1439–1466
SaalfeldA (1985) “A fast rubber-sheeting transformation using simplicial coordinates”. The American Cartographer12: 169–173
53.
SaalfeldA (1988) “Conflation: automated map compilation” International Journal of Geographical. Information Systems2: 217–228
54.
SamsonovT (2014) “Morphometric mapping of topography by flowline hachures”. The Cartographic Journal51: 63–74
55.
SatoTSadahiroYOkabeA (2000) “A computational procedure for joining separate map sheets”. GeoJournal52: 253–262
56.
SmithCGardnerW R (1817) “Comparative view of the lengths of the Principal Rivers in the World”. (C. Smith Mapseller No 172)
57.
SwyngedouwE (1999) “Modernity and hybridity: nature, Regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers89: 443–465
58.
TufteE R (1990) Envisioning Information, Cheshire, VT: Graphics Press
59.
TurnbullDWatsonH (1993) Maps are Territories: Science is an Atlas: A Portfolio of Exhibits, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
WhiteM SGriffinP (1985) “Piecewise linear rubber-sheet map transformation”. The American Cartographer12: 123–131
62.
WolterJ A (1972) “The heights of mountains and the lengths of rivers”. Quarterly Journal of the Library of Congress29: 186–205
63.
WoodDFelsJ (2008) The Natures of Maps: Cartographic Constructions of the Natural World, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
64.
WoodDKrygierJ (2009) “Critical cartography”. In: KitchinRThriftN (eds) International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 340–344
