What Matters More in Explaining Drug Court Graduation and Rearrest: Program Features,Individual Characteristics,or Some Combination

Abstract

This study examines the program- and individual-level factors that impact the success of drug court clients in terms of: (1) graduation; and (2) not being arrested while participating in the court program. The data consist of 848 individuals in nine drug courts. This paper discusses how different individual- and program-level factors impact the success of drug court participants. The findings suggest that individual- and program-level factors are both important in predicting program graduation and arrest during drug court participation, while controlling for participant demographics. Clients’ education, drug/alcohol usage, program staffing, and clinical standards impact program graduation while criminal history, drug/alcohol usage, number of program hours offered, program staffing, and use of rewards and sanctions predict in-program arrest. Models combining both program- and individual-level factors performed better than either alone, leading to recommendations that agencies should emphasize improving program quality while targeting clients’ needs to achieve greater success.

Keywords

drug courts hierarchical linear modeling programming risk need assessments program graduation rearrest

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2000). The level of service inventory-revised. Multi-Health Systems.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Hoge

R. D.

(1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854890017001004

Aos

Phipps

Barnoski

Lieb

(2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime, Version 4.0. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED453340

Belenko

(2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. National Drug Court Institute Review, 4, 1–60. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/research-drug-courts-critical-review-2001-update

Belenko

Fabrikant

Wolff

(2011). The long road to treatment: Models of screening and admission into drug courts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1222–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854811424690

Bourgon

Armstrong

(2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854804270618

Braveman

Gottlieb

(2014). The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(1_Suppl 2), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00333549141291S206

Carey

S. M.

Mackin

J. R.

Finigan

M. W.

(2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6–42. Available at https://npcresearch.com/publication/what-works-the-ten-key-components-of-drug-court-research-based-best-practices-3/

Caudy

M. S.

Tang

Ainsworth

S. A.

Lerch

Taxman

F. S.

(2013). Reducing recidivism through correctional programming: Using meta-analysis to inform the RNR simulation tool. In F. S. Taxman, & A. Pattavina (Eds.), Simulation strategies to reduce recidivism (pp. 167–193). Springer.

10.

Cissner

Rempel

Franklin

A. W.

Roman

J. K.

Bieler

Cohen

Cadoret

C. R.

(2013). A statewide evaluation of New York’s adult drug courts: Testing which policies work best [Paper presentation]. The New York Association of Drug Treatment Court Professionals Training. Available at http://www.nyadtcp.org/userfiles/file/presentation/The%202012%20New%20York%20State%20Drug%20Court%20Evaluation.pdf

11.

Cissner

A. B.

Rempel

(2005). The state of drug court research: Moving beyond ‘do they work?’. Center for Court Innovation. https://www.courtinnovation.org/publications/state-drug-court-research-moving-beyond-do-they-work

12.

Dannerbeck

Harris

Sundet

Lloyd

(2006). Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 5(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1300/J233v05n02_01

13.

DeVall

K. E.

Lanier

C. L.

(2012). Successful completion: An examination of factors influencing drug court completion for white and nonwhite male participants. Substance Use & Misuse, 47(10), 1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2012.680171

14.

Festinger

D. S.

Marlowe

D. B.

Lee

P. A.

Kirby

K. C.

Bovasso

McLellan

A. T.

(2002). Status hearings in drug court: When more is less and less is more. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00187-4

15.

Fixsen

D. L.

Blase

K. A.

Naoom

S. F.

Van Dyke

Wallace

(2009). Implementation: The missing link between research and practice. NIRN Implementation Brief, 1, 218–227. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3012/1644b63e7c007648df772ecd52e9c81d4950.pdf

16.

Gallagher

J. R.

Nordberg

Deranek

M. S.

Ivory

Carlton

Miller

J. W.

(2015). Predicting termination from drug court and comparing recidivism patterns: Treating substance use disorders in criminal justice settings. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2015.982451

17.

Gibbs

B. R.

Lytle

Wakefield

(2019). Outcome effects on recidivism among drug court participants. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854818800528

18.

Gutierrez

Bourgon

(2012). Drug treatment courts: A quantitative review of study and treatment quality. Justice Research and Policy, 14(2), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.3818%2FJRP.14.2.2012.47

19.

Harrell

Cavanagh

Roman

(1999). Findings from the evaluation of the DC superior court drug intervention program. Urban Institute.

20.

Carey

S. M.

Malsch

A. M.

(2018). Racial and gender disparities in treatment courts: Do they exist and is there anything we can do to change them?. Journal for Advancing Justice, 1(1), 5–34. https://nyatcp.org/assets/pdfs/powerpoints2020/AJ-Journal.pdf#page=15

21.

Kearley

Gottfredson

(2020). Long term effects of drug court participation: Evidence from a 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09382-1

22.

Kish

(1965). Sampling organizations and groups of unequal sizes. American Sociological Review, 30(4), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/2091346

23.

Kobus

(2009). Examining the impact of drug court participation for moderate and high risk offenders. [UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones, University of Nevada, Las Vegas]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://doi.org/10.34917/2533958

24.

Lipsey

M. W.

Cullen

F. T.

(2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833

25.

Marlowe

(2010). Research update on adult drug courts. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. https://www.ndci.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Research-Update-on-Adult-Drug-Courts-NADCP_1.pdf

26.

Marlowe

D. B.

(2003). Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision. Science & Practice Perspectives, 2(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1151%2Fspp03214

27.

Marlowe

D. B.

(2013). Who should drug treatment courts serve? Maximizing their outreach and potential impact. In Cooper

C. S.

(chief Ed.), Drug treatment courts: An international response to drug dependent offenders. American University and Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission.

28.

Marlowe

D. B.

Festinger

D. S.

Dugosh

K. L.

Lee

P. A.

(2005). Are judicial status hearings a “key component” of drug court?: Six and twelve months outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.01.019

29.

Marlowe

D. B.

Hardin

C. D.

Fox

C. L.

(2016). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving courts in the United States. National Drug Court Institute. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331374798_Painting_the_Current_Picture_A_National_Report_on_Drug_Courts_and_Other_Problem-Solving_Courts_in_the_United_States

30.

Mendoza

N. S.

Trinidad

J. R.

Nochajski

T. H.

Farrell

M. C.

(2013). Symptoms of depression and successful drug court completion. Community Mental Health Journal, 49(6), 787–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-013-9595-5

31.

Mitchell

Wilson

D. B.

Eggers

MacKenzie

D. L.

(2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009

32.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components (NCJ No. 205621). Author.

33.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2018a, revision). Adult drug court best practice standards, volume I. http://nadcp.org/standards

34.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2018b, revision). Adult drug court best practice standards, volume II. Available at http://nadcp.org/standards

35.

Peters

R. H.

Haas

A. L.

Murrin

M. R.

(1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 33–60. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/predictors-retention-and-arrest-drug-courts

36.

Peters

R. H.

Kremling

Bekman

N. M.

Caudy

M. S.

(2012). Co-occurring disorders in treatment-based courts: Results of a national survey. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(6), 800–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2024

37.

Piquero

A. R.

Jennings

W. G.

Diamond

Reingle

J. M.

(2015). A systematic review of age, sex, ethnicity, and race as predictors of violent recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0306624X13514733

38.

Prendergast

M. L.

Pearson

F. S.

Podus

Hamilton

Z. K.

Greenwell

(2013). The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. Journal of Experimental Criminology: Online First, 9, 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z

39.

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/

40.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Second, Vol. 1). Sage Publications.

41.

Ramezani

Bhati

Murphy

Routh

Taxman

(under review). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) program tool.

42.

Ramezani

Breno

A. J.

Mackey

B. J.

Viglione

Cuellar

A.E.

Johnson

J. E.

Taxman

F. S.

(under review). Confronting mass incarceration: Association between jail population size and access to community care.

43.

Rempel

Green

Kralstein

(2012). The impact of adult drug courts on crime and incarceration. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(3), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9143-2

44.

Roll

J. M.

Prendergast

Richardson

Burdon

Ramirez

(2005). Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31(4), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1081/ADA-200068428

45.

Roman

Townsend

Bhati

A. S.

(2003). Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: Nationally based estimates, final report. Caliber Associates and the Urban Institute. Available at https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/201229.pdf

46.

Sechrest

D. K.

Shicor

(2001). Determinants of graduation from a day treatment drug court in California: A preliminary study. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260103100108

47.

Shaffer

D. K.

(2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28(3), 493–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.525222

48.

Solomon

Draine

Marcus

S. C.

(2002). Predicting incarceration of clients of a psychiatric probation and parole service. Psychiatric Services, 53(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.53.1.50

49.

Taxman

F. S.

Belenko

(2012) Organizational change – technology transfer processes: A review of the literature. In Taxman

F. S.

Belenko

(Eds.), Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment (pp. 91–128). Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0412-5_4

50.

Taxman

F. S.

Pattavina

(Eds.). (2013). Simulation strategies to reduce recidivism: Risk Need Responsivity (RNR) modeling for the Criminal Justice System. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6188-3

51.

Taxman

F. S.

Smith

Rudes

D. S.

(2020). The legacy of intensive supervision programs. In Huebner

B. M.

Taxman

F. S.

Lattimore

P. K.

(Eds.), Handbook on moving corrections and sentencing forward: Building on the record (pp. 61–78). Taylor & Francis.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB