While specific responsivity factors are believed to either inhibit or facilitate successful involvement in programming, relatively little attention has been given to the validation of responsivity assessments used for correctional populations. Based on a sample of nearly 2,100 individuals confined in Minnesota prisons, this study examines the relationship between a needs and responsivity assessment system and multiple measures of program participation, dosage, and completion. The responsivity domains—childhood trauma, mental health, religiosity, motivation and learning style—were significantly associated with at least one measure of programming. All but two of the needs domains also had a significant association with programming involvement. We discuss the implications of the findings for correctional research and practice.
AlmigdalT. H. (2015). Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi Medical Journal, 36(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.3.10320
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithS. J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011128705281756
3.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.
4.
CiarrochiJ.HeavenP. C. L. (2012). Religious values and the development of trait hope and self-esteem in adolescents. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 676–688.
5.
ClarkV. A.DuweG. (2023). Evaluating the convergent and discriminate validity of a needs and responsivity assessment system [Manuscript under review]. Minnesota Department of Corrections.
6.
CullenF. T. (2002). Rehabilitation and treatment programs. In WilsonJ. Q.PetersiliaJ. (Eds.), Crime: Public policies for crime control (2nd ed., pp. 235–289). ICS Press.
7.
DobsonJ. L. (2010). A comparison between learning style preferences and sex, status, and course performance. Advances in Physiology Education, 34, 197–204.
8.
DuweG. (2021). Evaluating bias, shrinkage, and the home-field advantage: Results from a revalidation of the MnSTARR 2.0. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research, 9, 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2021.2011802
9.
DuweG.ClarkV. A. (2023). The concurrent and predictive validity of a needs and responsivity assessment system. Corrections: Policy, Practice and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2023.2298807
10.
DuweG.JohnsonB. R. (2023). New insights for “what works”: Religiosity and the Risk-needs-responsivity model. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231160
11.
DuweG.RocqueM. (2017). The effects of automating recidivism risk assessment on reliability, predictive validity, and return on investment (ROI). Criminology & Public Policy, 16, 235–269.
12.
FelittiV. J.AndaR. F.NordenbergD.WilliamsonD. F.SpitzA. M.EdwardsV.MarksJ. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258.
13.
FlemingN.MillsC. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11, 137–155.
14.
GendreauP.LittleT.GogginC. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology, 34, 575–607.
15.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.
16.
HoodR. W.HillP. C.SpilkaB. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
17.
JangS. J.JohnsonB. R.HaysJ.HallettM.DuweG. (2017). Religion and misconduct in “Angola” prison: Conversion, congregational participation, religiosity, and self-identities. Justice Quarterly, 35, 412–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1309057
18.
JeynesW. H. (2003). The effects of religious commitment on the academic achievement of urban and other children. Education and Urban Society, 36(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124503257206
19.
KingP. E.VaughnJ. M.YooY.TirrellJ. M.DowlingE. M.LernerR. M.GeldofG. J.LernerJ. V.IrahetaG.WilliamsK.SimA. T. R. (2020). Exploring religiousness and hope: Examining the roles of spirituality and social connections among Salvadoran Youth. Religions, 11, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020075
20.
KnightK.GarnerB. R.SimpsonD. D.MoreyJ. T.FlynnP. M. (2006). An assessment for criminal thinking. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011128705281749
21.
KrushasA.HamiltonZ.KigerlA.MeiX. (2024). Finding an answer in time: Assessing change in needs scores on time to recidivism among justice-involved youth. Journal of Criminal Justice, 90, 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102146
22.
LeiteW. L.SvinickiM.ShiY. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323–339.
23.
McCormickS.Peterson-BadaliM.SkillingT. A. (2017). The role of mental health and specific responsivity in juvenile justice rehabilitation. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 55–67.
24.
MillsJ. F.KronerD. G.ForthA. E. (2002). Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA): Development, factor structure, reliability and validity. Assessment, 9, 240–253.
25.
MitchellO.WilsonD. B.MacKenzieD. L. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the literature. The Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3, 353–375.
26.
MlamboV. (2011). An analysis of some factors affecting student academic performance in an introductory biochemistry course at the University of the West Indies. Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 1(2), 75–88.
27.
MowenT. J.StansfieldR.BomanJ. H. (2018). During, after or both? Isolating the effect of religious support on recidivism during reentry. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 1079–1101.
28.
MozaffariH. R.JanatolmakanM.SharifiR.GhandinejadF.AndayeshgarB.KhatonyA. (2020). The relationship between the VARK learning styles and academic achievement in dental students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, 15–19.
29.
PaternosterR.BushwayS. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 1103–1156.
30.
PinalsD. A.GabaA.ShafferP. M.AndreM. A.SmelsonD. A. (2021). Risk-need-responsivity and its application in behavioral health settings: A feasibility study of a treatment planning support tool. Behavioral Science and the Law, 39, 44–64.
31.
RegnerusM. D. (2003). The influence of religion upon the academic performance of youth in disadvantaged communities. Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society, University of Pennsylvania.
32.
SachsN. M.MillerJ. (2018). Beyond responsivity: Client service engagement in a reentry demonstration program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 4295–4313.
33.
TaxmanF. S.GiurannaR. A.DumenciL. (2011). Construct and predictive validity of criminal thinking scales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093854810389550
34.
ZimetG. D.DahlemN. W.ZimetS. G.FarleyG. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.
