Examining Individual Characteristics and Program Performance to Understand Two-Year Recidivism Rates Among Drug Court Participants: Comparing Graduates and Terminators

Abstract

Drug courts strive to break the cycle of substance use and crime by providing community-based treatment and rehabilitation. The purpose of the present study was to (a) identify significantly different factors between program participants (i.e., graduates/terminators) that may affect recidivism and (b) examine these significant individual and program performance factors associated with two-year recidivism. Secondary data were examined for a stratified random sample of drug court participants (N = 534). Examining any two-year post-program recidivism (defined as an arrest, conviction, or incarceration), over one third (37.6%) of graduates and almost all program terminators (95.3%) had two-year post-program recidivism (p < .001). For the overall sample, age, outpatient treatment, marital status, number of times treated for a psychiatric problem in a hospital, substance use (i.e., past-30-day cocaine use and intravenous opiate use), number of positive drug tests, and receiving any sanction/therapeutic response were associated with two-year post-program recidivism. Further analyses suggested age and outpatient treatment were particularly important for program graduates. Findings provide information for early targeting of resources to drug court participants most at risk of poorer post-program outcomes by identifying factors known at program entry and indicators during program participation.

Keywords

drug court individual characteristics program performance recidivism drug court outcomes rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aday

L. A.

Cornelius

L. J.

(2006). Designing and conducting health surveys: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Administrative Office of the Courts. (2015). Kentucky Drug Courts: Saving costs, saving lives. Retrieved from http://courts.ky.gov/courtprograms/drugcourt/Pages/default.aspx

Belenko

(2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review 2001 update. New York, NY: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risks-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation (User Report No. 2007-06). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.pbpp.pa.gov/Information/Documents/Research/EBP7.pdf

Brown

(2011). Drug court effectiveness: A matched cohort study in the Dane County drug treatment court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50, 191-201.

Butzin

C. A.

Saum

C. A.

Scarpitti

F. R.

(2002). Factors associated with completion of a drug treatment court diversion program. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1615-1633.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Epi Info 7. Retrieved from http://wwwn.cdc.gov/epiinfo/7/index.htm

Ducharme

L. J.

Knudsen

Roman

(2006). Evidence based treatment for opiate-dependent clients: Availability, variation, and organizational correlates. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32, 569-576.

Frederick

(2014). Veterans treatment courts: Analysis and recommendations. Law & Psychology Review, 38, 211-230.

10.

Gallagher

J. R.

Nordberg

Deranek

M. S.

Ivory

Carlton

Miller

J. W.

(2015). Predicting termination from drug court and comparing recidivism patterns: Treating substance use disorders in criminal justice settings. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33, 28-43.

11.

Gottfredson

D. C.

Najaka

S. S.

Kearley

B. W.

(2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171-196.

12.

Gray

A. R.

Saum

C. A.

(2005). Mental health, gender, and drug court completion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 55-69.

13.

Gutierrez

Bourgon

(2012). Drug treatment courts: A quantitative review of study and treatment quality. Justice Research and Policy, 14, 47-77.

14.

Guydish

J. R.

(2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 115-1172.

15.

Guzmán

D. E.

(2012). Drug courts: Scope and challenges of an alternative to incarceration (International Drug Policy Consortium Briefing Paper). Available from http://idpc.net/

16.

Hepburn

J. R.

Harvey

A. N.

(2007). The effect of the threat of legal sanction on program retention and completion: Is that why they stay in drug court? Crime Delinquency, 53, 255-280.

17.

Hickert

A. O.

Boyle

S. W.

Tollefson

D. R.

(2009). Factors that predict drug court completion and drop out: Findings from an evaluation of Salt Lake County’s adult felony drug court. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 149-165. doi:10.1080/01488370802678926

18.

Huddleston

Marlowe

D. B.

(2011). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the united states. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.

19.

Kalich

D. M.

Evans

R. D.

(2006). Drug court: An effective alternative to incarceration. Deviant Behavior, 27, 569-590.

20.

Lilley

D. R.

(2013). Drug courts and community crime rates: A nationwide analysis of jurisdiction-level outcomes. Journal of Criminology, 2013, Article 571760. doi:10.1155/2013/571760

21.

Listwan

S. J.

Sundt

J. L.

Holsinger

A. M.

Latessa

E. J.

(2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 389-411.

22.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

Latessa

E. J.

Smith

(2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principlese of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 575-594.

23.

Marlowe

(2010). Research update on adult drug courts. Retrieved from http://www.nadcp.org/sites/default/files/nadcp/Research%20Update%20on%20Adult%20Drug%20Courts%20-%20NADCP_1.pdf

24.

McLellan

Luborsky

Woody

O’Brien

(1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 168, 26-33.

25.

Mendoza

N. S.

Trinidad

J. R.

Nochajski

T. H.

Farrell

M. C.

(2013). Symptoms of depression and successful drug court completion. Community Mental Health Journal, 49, 787-792.

26.

Mitchell

Wilson

D. B.

Eggers

MacKenzie

(2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60-71.

27.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Court Program Office. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals.

28.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2013). Adult drug court best practice standards (Vol. I). Alexandria, VA: Author.

29.

National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (2015). Adult drug court best practice standards (Vol. II). Alexandria, VA: Author.

30.

National Drug Court Institute. (2006). Local drug court research: Navigating performance measures and process evaluation (Monograph Series 6). Alexandria, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.bja.gov/publications/local_drug_court_research.pdf

31.

National Drug Court Institute. (2008). Quality improvement for drug courts: Evidence-based practices (Monograph Series 9). Alexandria, VA: Author. Available from http://www.ndci.org

32.

Palmer

(1995). Programmatic and nonprogrammatic aspects of successful intervention: New directions for research. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 100-131.

33.

Peters

R. H.

Haas

A. L.

Murin

M. R.

(1999). Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. Available from http://www.ndci.org

34.

Peters

R. H.

Young

M. S.

Rojas

E. C.

Gorey

C. M.

(2017). Evidence-based treatment and supervision practices for co-occurring mental and substance use disorders in the criminal justice system. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 43, 475-488.

35.

Reich

W. A.

Picard-Fritsche

Rempel

Farley

E. J.

(2016). Treatment modality, failure, and re-arrest: A test of the risk principle with substance-abusing criminal defendants. Journal of Drug Issues, 46, 234-246.

36.

Rempel

(2006). Recidivism 101: Evaluating the impact of your drug court. Drug Court Review, 5, 83-112.

37.

Rempel

Destefano

(2001). Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment: Findings at the Brooklyn treatment court, 1996-2000. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 33, 87-124.

38.

Roll

J. M.

Prendergast

Richardson

Burdon

Ramirez

(2005). Identifying predictors of treatment outcome in a drug court program. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 642-656.

39.

Sanford

J. S.

Arrigo

B. A.

(2005). Lifting the cover on drug courts: Evaluation findings and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 239-259.

40.

Saum

C. A.

Robbins

F. R.

Scarpitti

C. A.

(2001). Violent offenders in drug court. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 107-128.

41.

Segal

E. A.

Gerdes

K. E.

Steiner

(2013). Empowerment Series. An introduction to the profession of social work: Becoming a change agent (4th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

42.

Sevigny

E. L.

Fuleihan

Ferdik

F. V.

(2013). Do drug court reduce the use of incarceration? A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 416-425.

43.

Shaffer

D. K.

(2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493-521.

44.

Shaffer

D. K.

Hartman

J. L.

Listwan

S. J.

(2009). Drug abusing women in the community: The impact of drug court involvement on recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 39, 803-828.

45.

Shannon

Jackson

Newell

Neal

(2016). Examining the impact of drug court on two-year recidivism rates: A comparison of program participants and referrals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1-22.

46.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1996). Treatment drug courts: Integrating substance abuse treatment with legal case processing (Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 23). Rockville, MD. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64452/

47.

Taylor

(2010). Building recovery-oriented systems of care for drug court participants (Drug Court Practitioner Fact Sheet, Vol. 9, No. 1). Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute. Available from http://www.ndci.org

48.

Urbaniak

Plous

(2012). Research randomizer. Retrieved from http://www.randomizer.org/form.htm

49.

Wolf

E. M.

Sowards

K. A.

Wolf

D. A.

(2003). Predicting retention of drug court participants using event history analysis. In Pallone

N.J.

(ed.), Treating substance users in correctional contexts: New understandings, new modalities (pp. 139-162). Binghamptom, NY:Haworth Press.

50.

Wolfe

Guydish

Termondt

(2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrest in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1155-1172.

51.

Zettler

H. R.

(2017). Exploring the relationship between dual diagnosis and recidivism in drug court participants. Crime & Delinquency, 64, 363-397.