Although offense-supportive cognitions are related to the maintenance of contact sexual offending behavior, it is unknown whether this finding also applies to online sexual offending behavior. A few studies have examined the cognitions of men convicted for using child sexual exploitation material, but findings remain limited due to important methodological limitations. Furthermore, fewer studies have investigated the cognitions of men who use the internet to solicit sexual activities with children. The objective of this study was to examine the nature of the cognitions that support online sexual offending against children. The content of police interviews was analyzed using a thematic analysis to identify the cognitive themes present in the offense-related views expressed by 20 men who consumed child sexual exploitation material, 15 who sexually solicited children, and 18 who committed both types of online offenses. Results revealed eight cognitive themes that reflected four underlying themes related to interpersonal relationships, the sexualisation of children, perceptions of the self, and perceptions of the virtual environment. Findings indicate that while the cognitive themes of the three groups are similar, their specific content varies according to the types of offenses. Implications for future research are discussed.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(84)90008-6
2.
AbelG. G.GoreD. K.HollandC. L.CampN.BeckerJ. V.RathnerJ. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00851319
3.
BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.HermannC. A. (2011). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 23, 92–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210370708
4.
BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K.VanZuylenH. (2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x
5.
BartelsR. M.MerdianH. L. (2016). The implicit theories of child sexual exploitation material offenders: An initial conceptualization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 26, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.11.002
6.
BlumenthalS.GudjonssonG.BurnsJ. (1999). Cognitive distortions and blame attribution in sex offenders against adults and children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 129–143.
BumbyK. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse, 8, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02258015
9.
BumbyK. M.HansenD. J. (1997). Intimacy deficits, fear of intimacy, and loneliness among sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854897024003001
10.
CooperA.DelmonicoD. L.Griffin-ShelleyE.MathyR. M. (2004). Online sexual activity: An examination of potentially problematic behaviors. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 11, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160490882642
11.
CorriveauP.FortinF. (2011). Cyberpédophiles et autres agresseurs virtuels [Online pedophiles and others virtual abusers]. VLB.
12.
CortoniF.MarshallW. L. (2001). Sex as a coping strategy and its relationship to juvenile sexual history and intimacy in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 13, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320101300104
13.
Cybertip. (2016). Child sexual abuse images on the internet: A Cybertip.ca analysis.
14.
DeLongR.DurkinK.HundersmarckS. (2010). An exploratory analysis of the cognitive distortions of a sample of men arrested in internet sex stings. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903428235
15.
ElliotI. A. (2011). Psychological characteristics of users of child pornography on the internet (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom). https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/2822/
16.
FortinF.CorriveauP. (2015). Who is Bob_34? Investigating child cyberpornography. UBC Press.
17.
FortinF.PaquetteS.DupontB. (2018). From online to offline sexual offending: Episodes and obstacles. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.01.003
18.
GanaK.TrouilletR.MartinB.ToffartL. (2001). The relationship between boredom proneness and solitary sexual behaviors in adults. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 385–390. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.4.385
19.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
20.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
21.
HelmusL. H.HansonR. K.BabchishinK. M.MannR. E. (2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 14, 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012462244
22.
HowittD.SheldonK. (2007). The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601060564
KelleU. (2005). “Emergence” vs. “forcing” of empirical data? A crucial problem of the “Grounded Theory” reconsidered. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6, Article 27. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502275
25.
KettleboroughD. G.MerdianH. L. (2017). Gateway to offending behaviour: Permission-giving thoughts of online users of child sexual exploitation material. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An International, Interdisciplinary Forum for Research, Theory & Practice, 23, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1231852
26.
KloessJ. A.LarkinM.BeechA. R.Hamilton-GiachritsisC. E. (2019). Case studies of men’s perceptions of their online sexual interactions with young people: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sexual Abuse, 31, 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218769031
27.
LanningK.BurgessA. W. (1984, January). Child pornography and sex rings. F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1–7.
28.
MannixK.DawsonD. L.BeckleyK. (2013). The implicit theories of male child sexual offenders residing in a high secure psychiatric hospital. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2012.732616
29.
MarshallW. L. (1993). The role of attachments, intimacy, and loneliness in the etiology and maintenance of sexual offending. Sexual & Marital Therapy, 8, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990903550191
30.
MarzianoV.WardT.BeechA. R.PattisonP. (2006). Identification of five fundamental implicit theory underlying cognitive distortions in child abusers: A preliminary study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160500056887
31.
MilnerR. J.WebsterS. D. (2005). Identifying schemas in child molesters, rapists, and violent offenders. Sexual Abuse, 17, 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700406
32.
MurphyW. D. (1990). Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 331–342). Plenum Press.
NickersonR. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
35.
Ó CiardhaC.GannonT. A. (2011). The cognitive distortions of child molesters are in need of treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2011.580573
36.
O’BrienM. D.WebsterS. D. (2007). The construction and preliminary validation of the Internet Behaviours and Attitudes Questionnaire (IBAQ). Sexual Abuse, 19, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11194-007-9057-0
37.
PaquetteS.CortoniF. (2019). The development and validation of the Cognitions on Internet Sexual Offending (C-ISO) scale. Sexual Abuse, 32(8), 2020.
38.
PaquetteS.CortoniF.ProulxJ.LongpréN. (2014). An examination of implicit theories among francophone child molesters. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.798689
39.
QuayleE.TaylorM. (2003). Model of problematic internet use in people with a sexual interest in children. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103321168009
40.
RogersR.DickeyR. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850139
41.
SetoM. C. (2013). Internet sex offenders. American Psychological Association.
42.
SetoM. C.ReevesL.JungS. (2010). Explanations given by child pornography offenders for their crimes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903572396
43.
SetoM. C.WoodJ. M.BabchishinK. M.FlynnS. (2012). Online solicitation offenders are different from child pornography offenders and lower risk contact sexual offenders. American Psychological Association, 36, 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093925
44.
SoldinoV.MerdianH. L.BartelsR. M.BradshawH. K. (2020). Implicit theories of child sexual exploitation material offenders: Cross-cultural validation of interview findings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64, 315–334.
45.
SundbergN. D.LatkinC. A.FarmerR. F.SaoudJ. (1991). Boredom in young adults: Gender and cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 22, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191222003
46.
TaylorM.QuayleE. (2003). Child pornography: An internet crime. Brunner-Routledge.
WardT.HudsonS. M.JohnstonL.MarshallW. L. (1997). Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)81034-3
49.
WardT.HudsonS. M.MarshallW. L. (1996). Attachment style in sex offenders: A preliminary study. The Journal of Sex Research, 33, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499609551811
WhittleH. C.Hamilton-GiachritsisC. E.BeechA. R. (2015). A comparison of victim and offender perspectives of grooming and sexual abuse. Deviant Behavior, 36, 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.944074
52.
WinderB.GoughB.Seymour-SmithS. (2015). Stumbling into sexual crime: The passive perpetrator in accounts by male internet sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0302-6
53.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. J. (2005). Child pornography possessors arrested in internet-related crimes: Findings from the National Juvenile Online Victimization Study (Report CV81).
54.
WolakJ.FinkelhorD.MitchellK. J.YbarraM. L. (2008). Online “predators” and their victims. American Psychological Association, 63, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.2.111
55.
YoderV. C.VirdenT., B.IIIAminK. (2005). Internet pornography and loneliness: An association?Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 12, 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160590933653
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
