Cognitive distortions in sex offenders are specific or general beliefs/attitudes that violate commonly accepted norms of rationality that have been shown to be associated with the onset and maintenance of sexual offending. In this article, we describe the major theories that have been formulated to explain the role of distorted cognition in initiating and maintaining sexual offending. We evaluate each theory in light of a set of theory appraisal criteria and the available empirical research. Finally, we conclude by drawing together the results of this theory evaluation process and highlight the major implications for treatment and future research.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89–103.
2.
AbelG. G.GoreD. K.HollandC. L.CampN. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135–152.
3.
AbelG. G.RouleauJ. L.Cunningham-RathnerJ. (1986). Sexually aggressive behavior. In CurranW. J.McGarryA. L.ShahS. A. (Eds.), Forensic psychiatry and psychology: Perspectives and standards for interdisciplinary practice (pp. 289–313). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
4.
AdamsF.AizawaK. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
5.
AlbrechtJ. E.O’BrienE. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
6.
AuburnT. (2010). Cognitive distortions as social practices: An examination of cognitive distortions in sex offender treatment from a discursive psychology perspective. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 103–123. doi:10.1080/10683160802621990
7.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BanseR.SchmidtA. F.ClarbourJ. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 319–335. doi:10.1177/0093854809357598
9.
Barnes-HolmesD.HaydenE.Barnes-HolmesY.StewartI. (2008). The implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) as a response-time and event-related-potentials methodology for testing natural verbal relations: A preliminary study. Psychological Record, 58, 497–515.
10.
BarrettL. (2011). Beyond the brain: How body and environment shape animal and human minds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00715
12.
BartelsR. M.GannonT. A. (2011). Understanding the sexual fantasies of sex offenders and their correlates. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(6), 551–561. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.08.002
13.
BeckA. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and emotional disorders. New York, NY: Meridian.
14.
BeckA. T. (1999). Prisoners of hate: The cognitive basis of anger, hostility and violence. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
15.
BeechA. R.FisherD.WardT. (2005). Sexual murderers’ implicit theories. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1366–1389. doi:10.1177/0886260505278712
16.
BeechA. R.KalmusE.TipperS. P.BaudouinJ. Y.FlakV.HumphreysG. W. (2008). Children induce an enhanced attentional blink in child molesters. Psychological Assessment, 20, 397–402. doi:10.1037/a0013587
17.
BeechA. R.ParrettN.WardT.FisherD. (2009). Assessing female sexual offenders’ motivations and cognitions: An exploratory study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 201–216. doi:10.1080/10683160802190921
18.
BeechA. R.WardT.FisherD. (2006). The identification of sexual and violent motivations in men who assault women: Implication for treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1635–1653. doi:10.1177/0886260506294242
19.
BlakeE.GannonT. A. (2010). The implicit theories of rape-prone men: An information-processing investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 54, 895–914. doi:10.1177/0306624x09347732
20.
BrownA. S.GrayN. S.SnowdenR. J. (2009). Implicit measurement of sexual associations in child sex abusers: Role of victim type and denial. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 166–180. doi:10.1177/1079063209332234
21.
BumbyK. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Developments and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37−54. doi:10.1007/bf02258015
22.
DawsonD. L.Barnes-HolmesD.GresswellD. M.HartA. J.GoreN. J. (2009). Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure: A first study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 57–75. doi:10.1177/1079063208326928
23.
DeanC.MannR. E.MilnerR.MarunaS. (2007). Changing child sexual abusers’ cognition. In GannonT. A.WardT.BeechA. R.FisherD. (Eds.), Aggressive offenders’ cognition: Theory, research and practice (pp. 117–134). New York, NY: John Wiley.
24.
DrakeC. R.WardT.NathanP.LeeJ. K. P. (2001). Challenging the cognitive distortions of child molesters: An implicit theory approach. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 7, 25–40.
25.
DuffS. C.Schulte-MecklenbeckM. (in press). The mind in a child’s eyes: A test of theory of mind skills with child stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
ElsegoodK. J.DuffS. C. (2010). Theory of mind in men who have sexually offended against children: A U.K. Comparison study between child sex offenders and nonoffender controls. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 112–131. doi:10.1177/1079063209359926
27.
GannonT.A.AlleyneE. (2013). Female sexual abusers' cognition: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 67–79.
28.
GannonT. A.HoareJ. A.RoseM. R.ParrettN. (2010). A re-examination of female child molesters’ implicit theories: Evidence of female specificity?Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10683161003752303
29.
GannonT. A.KeownK.RoseM. R. (2009). An examination of current psychometric assessments of child molesters’ offense-supportive beliefs using ward’s implicit theories. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 316–333. doi:10.1177/0306624x07312791
30.
GannonT. A.KeownK.PolaschekD. (2007). Increasing honest responding on cognitive distortions in child molesters: The bogus pipeline revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 5–22. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9033-0
31.
GannonT. A.PolaschekD. L. L. (2006). Cognitive distortions in child molesters: A re-examination of key theories and research. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 1000–1019. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.010
32.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R. (2009). Offense-related interpretative bias in female child molesters: A preliminary study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 194–207. doi:10.1177/1079063209332236
33.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R.WardT. (2008). A descriptive model of the offense process for female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20, 352–374. doi:10.1177/1079063208322495
34.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R.WilliamsS. E. (2009). Do female child molesters implicitly associate children and sex?A preliminary investigation. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 55–61. doi:10.1080/13552600802452559
35.
GannonT. A.WardT.CollieR. (2007). Cognitive distortions in child molesters: Theoretical and research developments over the past two decades. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 402–416. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.09.005
36.
GannonT. A.WrightD. B.BeechA. R.WilliamsS. (2006). Do child molesters hold distorted beliefs? What does their memory recall tell us?Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 5–18.
37.
GilchristE. (2009). Implicit thinking about implicit theories in intimate partner violence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 131–145. doi:10.1080/10683160802190863
38.
GrayN. S.BrownA. S.MacCullochM. J.SmithJ.SnowdenR. J. (2005). An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 304–308. doi:10.1037/0021-843k114.2.304
39.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
40.
HansonR. K.GizzarelliR.ScottH. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders—Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 187–202.
41.
HarrisG. T.RiceM. E.QuinseyV. L.ChaplinT. C. (1996). Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest among child molesters and normal heterosexual men. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 389–394.
42.
HookerC. A. (1987). A realistic theory of science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
43.
KamphuisJ. H.De RuiterC.JanssenB.SpieringM. (2005). Preliminary evidence for an automatic link between sex and power among men who molest children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1351–1365. doi:10.1177/0886260505278719
44.
KeownK.GannonT. A.WardT. (2008a). The effects of visual priming on information processing in child sexual offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14, 145–159.
45.
KeownK.GannonT. A.WardT. (2008b). What were they thinking? An exploration of child sexual offenders’ beliefs using a lexical decision task. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 317–337. doi:10.1080/10683160701770112
46.
KeownK.GannonT. A.WardT. (2010). What’s in a measure? A multi-method study of child sexual offenders’ beliefs. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 125–143. doi:10.1080/10683160802622022
47.
MannR.BeechA. (2003). Cognitive distortions, schemas, and implicit theories. In WardT.LawsD. R.HudsonS. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 135–153). London, England: Sage.
48.
MannR.HollinC. (2010). Self-reported schemas in sexual offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 834–851. doi:10.1080/14789949.2010.511240
49.
MannR. E.HollinC. R. (2001). Schemas: A model for understanding cognition in sexual offending. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Research and Treatment Conference, Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
50.
MannR. E.HollinC. R. (2007). Sexual offenders’ explanations for their offending. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13, 3–9. doi:10.1080/13552600701365621
51.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E.SerranG. A.FernandezY. M. (2006). Treating sexual offenders: An integrated approach. London, England: Routledge.
52.
MarunaS.MannR. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155–177.
53.
MarzianoV.WardT.BeechA. R.PattisonP. (2006). Identification of five fundamental implicit theories underlying cognitive distortions in child abusers: A preliminary study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 97–105. doi:10.1080/10683160500056887
54.
MenaryR. A. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
55.
MihailidesS.DevillyG. J.WardT. (2004). Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 333–350.
56.
MilnerR.WebsterS. (2005). Identifying schemas in child molesters, rapists, and violent offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 425–439. doi:10.1007/s11194-005-8053-5
57.
NeidighL.KropH. (1992). Cognitive distortions among child sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 18, 208−215.
58.
Newton-SmithW. (2002). A companion to the philosophy of science. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
59.
NunesK. L.FirestoneP.BaldwinM. W. (2007). Indirect assessment of cognitions of child sexual abusers with the Implicit Association Test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 454–475. doi:10.1177/0093854806291703
60.
Ó CiardhaC. (2011). A theoretical framework for understanding deviant sexual interest and cognitive distortions as overlapping constructs contributing to sexual offending against children. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 493–502. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.05.001
61.
Ó CiardhaC.GannonT. A. (2011). The cognitive distortions of child molesters are in need of treatment. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 130–141. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.580573
62.
Ó CiardhaC.GannonT. A. (2012). The implicit theories of firesetters: A preliminary conceptualization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(2), 122-128. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.12.001.
63.
PolaschekD. L. L.CalvertS. W.GannonT. A. (2009). Linking violent thinking: Implicit theory-based research with violent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 75–96. doi:10.1177/0886260508315781
64.
PolaschekD. L. L.GannonT. A. (2004). The implicit theories of rapists: What convicted offenders tell us. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 299–314.
65.
PolaschekD. L. L.WardT. (2002). The implicit theories of potential rapists: What our questionnaires tell us. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 385–406.
66.
PollockN. L.HashmallJ. M. (1991). The excuses of child molesters. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 9, 53–59. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370090107
67.
RogersR.DickeyR. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 4, 49–63. doi:10.1007/bf00850139
68.
SterelnyK. (2012). The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. Cambridge, MT: MIT Press.
69.
WardT. (2000). Sexual offenders’ cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 491–507.
70.
WardT.BeechA. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44–63. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002
71.
WardT.BeechA. (2008). An integrated theory of sexual offending. In LawsD. R.O’DonohueW. T. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 21–36). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
72.
WardT.CaseyA. (2010). Extending the mind into the world: A new theory of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 49–58. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.002
73.
WardT.FonC.HudsonS. M.McCormackJ. (1998). A descriptive model of dysfunctional cognitions in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 129–155.
74.
WardT.GannonT. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77–94. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.06.001
75.
WardT.GannonT. A.KeownK. (2006). Beliefs, values, and action: The judgment model of cognitive distortions in sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 323–340. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.10.003
76.
WardT.HudsonS. M.MarshallW. L. (1996). Attachment style in sex offenders: A preliminary study. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 17–26. doi:10.1080/00224499609551811
WardT.KeenanT.HudsonS. M. (2000). Understanding cognitive, affective, and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A developmental perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 41–62.
79.
WardT.KeownK.GannonT. A. (2007). Cognitive distortions as belief, value and action judgments. In GannonT. A.WardT.BeechA.FisherD. (Eds.), Aggressive offenders’ cognition: Theory, research and practice. Sussex, England: John Wiley.
80.
WardT.LoudenK.HudsonS. M.MarshallW. L. (1995). A descriptive model of the offense chain for child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 452–472.
81.
WardT.PolaschekD. L. L.BeechA. (2006). Theories of Sexual Offending. Sussex, England: John Wiley.
82.
WardT.VertueF.HaigB. (1999). Abductive method and clinical assessment in practice. Behaviour Change, 16, 49–63.
83.
WilsonR. J.PrinzoM. (2001). Circles of support: A restorative justice initiative. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 13, 59–77. doi:10.1300/J056v13n03_05
