Exploring Differences in Criminogenic Risk Factors and Criminal Behavior Between Young Adult Violent Offenders With and Without Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability

Abstract

The relation between mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID) and violent offense behavior was studied among a group of former juvenile delinquents currently in a diversion program for persistent young adult violent offenders from Amsterdam (N = 146). Offenders were considered MBID if they had received juvenile probation from the local youth care agency specialized in intellectual disability (21%). A file study was used to estimate prevalence rates of criminogenic risk factors. Police data were used to depict recent criminal behavior. Nearly all offenders grew up in large and unstable multi-problem households and had psychosocial problems. More MBID offenders displayed externalizing behavior before the age of 12, were susceptible to peer pressure, and had low social-relational skills. MBID offenders committed more violent property crimes than offenders without MBID. Youth care interventions for MBID offenders should focus on the acquisition of social-relational skills and on the pedagogical skills of parents.

Keywords

borderline intellectual functioning mild intellectual disability violent crime young adulthood persistence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Hoge

R. D.

(1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.

Asscher

J. J.

Van der Put

C. E.

Stams

G. J. J.

(2012). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disability in offense type and risk factors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1905-1913.

Barron

Hassiotis

Banes

(2004). Offenders with intellectual disability: A prospective comparative study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 69-76.

Beaver

K. M.

Schwartz

J. A.

Nedelec

J. L.

Connolly

E. J.

Boutwell

B. B.

Barnes

J. C.

(2013). Intelligence is associated with criminal justice processing: Arrest through incarceration. Intelligence, 41, 277-288.

Blokland

Palmen

Van San

(2012). Crimineel gedrag in de jongvolwassenheid [Criminal behavior in young adulthood]. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 54(2), 85-98.

Boertjes

M. J.

Lever

M. S.

(2007). LVG en jeugdcriminaliteit [Mild intellectual disability and juvenile crime]. Diemen, The Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Jeugdzorg—Gehandicaptenzorg William Schrikker.

Bonta

Andrews

D. A.

(2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6, 1-22.

Brand

E. F. J. M

. (2005a). Een maat voor de kwaliteit van instrumenten voor risicotaxatie [A measure for the quality of instruments for risk assessment]. In Sjerps

M. F.

Coster van Voorhout

J. A.

(Eds.), Het onzekere bewijs. Gebruik van statistiek en kansrekening in het strafrecht (pp. 429-456). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

10.

Brand

E. F. J. M

. (2005b). Onderzoeksrapport PIJ-dossiers 2003C: Predictieve validiteit van de FPJ-lijst [Research study PIJ-files 2003C: Predictive validity of the FPJ-list]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Department of Justice, National Agency of Correctional Institutions.

11.

Brand

E. F. J. M.

Van Heerde

W. K.

(2004). Handleiding FPJ-lijst. Forensisch profiel justitiële jeugdigen [Scoring Manual FPJ-list. Juvenile forensic profile]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen, Department of Justice, National Agency of Correctional Institutions.

12.

Brand

E. F. J. M.

Van Heerde

W. K.

(2010). Handleiding FPJ-lijst. Forensisch profiel justitiële jeugdigen [Scoring Manual FPJ-list. Juvenile forensic profile]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Department of Justice, National Agency of Correctional Institutions.

13.

Bransen

Schipper

Blekman

(2009). Middelengebruik door jongeren met een licht verstandelijke handicap [Substance use among juveniles with a mild intellectual disorder]. Verslaving, 5(4), 37-49.

14.

Cicchetti

D. V.

(1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.

15.

Clare

I. C. H.

Gudjonsson

G. H.

(1993). Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interrogations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 295-301.

16.

De Jong

Colijn

(Eds.). (2010). Handboek culturele psychiatrie en psychotherapie [Handbook cultural psychiatry and psychotherapy]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: De Tijdstroom.

17.

Farrington

D. P.

(1995). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 929-964.

18.

Frize

Kenny

Lennings

(2008). The relationship between intellectual disability, indigenous status and risk of reoffending in juvenile offenders on community orders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 510-519.

19.

Gardner

W. I.

Moffatt

C. W.

(1990). Aggressive behaviour: Definition, assessment, treatment. International Review of Psychiatry, 2, 91-100.

20.

Goodman

Simonoff

Stevenson

(1995). The impact of child IQ, parent IQ and sibling IQ on child behavioural deviance scores. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 409-425.

21.

Hicks

B. M.

Krueger

R. F.

Iacono

W. G.

McGue

Patrick

C. J.

(2004). Family transmission and heritability of externalizing disorders: A twin-family study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 922-928.

22.

Hirschi

Hindelang

M. J.

(1977). Intelligence and delinquency: A revisionist view. American Sociological Review, 42, 571-587.

23.

Kaal

H. L.

(2010). Beperkt en gevangen. De haalbaarheid van prevalentieonderzoek naar verstandelijke beperking in detentie [The feasibility of prevalence research into intellectual disability in detention]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum, Ministerie van Veiligheid & Justitie.

24.

Kaal

H. L.

Brand

E. F. J. M.

Van Nieuwenhuijzen

(2012). Serious juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 3, 66-76.

25.

Koolhof

Loeber

Wei

E. H.

Pardini

d’Escury

A. C.

(2007). Inhibition deficits of serious delinquent boys of low intelligence. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17, 274-292.

26.

Kroll

Rothwell

Bradley

Shah

Bailey

Harrington

R. C.

(2002). Mental health needs of boys in secure care for serious or persistent offending: A prospective, longitudinal study. The Lancet, 359, 1975-1979.

27.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

28.

Loeber

(1990). Development and risk factors of juvenile antisocial behavior and delinquency. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 1-41.

29.

Loeber

Farrington

D. P.

(Eds.). (1998). Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

30.

Lundman

R. J.

(1993). Prevention and control of juvenile delinquency (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

31.

McCord

Zola

(1959). Origins of crime: A new evaluation of the Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

32.

McGillicuddy

N. B.

(2006). A review of substance use research among those with mental retardation. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 12, 41-47.

33.

Mejdoubi

Van den Heijkant

Struijf

Van Leerdam

HiraSing

Crijnen

(2011). Addressing risk factors for child abuse among high risk pregnant women: Design of a randomised controlled trial of the nurse family partnership in Dutch preventive health care. BMC Public Health, 11, 823.

34.

Moffit

T. E.

Gabrielli

W. F.

Mednick

S. A.

Schulsinger

(1981). Socioeconomic status, IQ, and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 152-157.

35.

Murray

Farrington

D. P.

(2010). Risk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency: Key findings from longitudinal studies. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 55, 633-642.

36.

Novaco

R. W.

Taylor

J. L.

(2004). Assessment of anger and aggression in male offenders with developmental disabilities. Psychological Assessment, 16, 42-50.

37.

Olds

Henderson

C. R.

Jr. Cole

Eckenrode

Kitzman

Luckey

. . . Powers

(1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1238-1244.

38.

Olds

Hill

P. L.

Mihalic

S. F.

O’Brien

(2001). Nurse-family partnership: Blueprints for violence prevention. Boulder: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

39.

Resing

W. C. M.

Hessels

M. G. P.

(2001). Het meten van de cognitieve mogelijkheden en het schoolgedrag van allochtone kinderen [Measuring cognitive abilities and school behavior in immigrant children in the Netherlands]. In Bleichrodt

van de Vijver

(Eds.), Diagnostiek bij allochtonen: mogelijkheden en beperkingen van psychologische tests (pp. 89-118). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

40.

Schalock

R. L.

Borthwick-Duffy

S. A.

Bradley

V. J.

Buntinx

W. H.

Coulter

D. L.

Craig

E. M.

. . . Yeager

M. H.

(2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

41.

Stevens

Van Marle

H. J. C.

(2003). De PIJ-maatregel als opvoedingsinstrument. De PIJ-maatregel en de casuïstiek [The PIJ-order as a way of re-education]. Sancties, 4, 221-234.

42.

Taylor

Lindsay

W. R.

(2010). Understanding and treating offenders with learning disabilities: A review of recent developments. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 1(1), 5-16.

43.

Teeuwen

(2012). Verraderlijk gewoon: Licht verstandelijk gehandicapte jongeren, hun wereld en hun plaats in het strafrecht [Deceitfully normal: Mild intellectually disabled juveniles, their world and their place in criminal law]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij SWP.

44.

Tymchuk

A. J.

Feldman

M. A.

(1991). Parents with mental retardation and their children: Review of research relevant to professional practice. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 32, 486-496.

45.

Van der Duin

. (2006). Effectieve jeugdinterventies: VoorZorg [Effective youth interventions: Precaution]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nederlands Jeugdinstituut. Retrieved from http://www.nji.nl/jeugdinterventies

46.

Van der Linden

A. P.

Ten Siethoff

F. G. A.

Zeijlstra-Rijpstra

A. E. I. J

. (2001). Jeugd en Recht [Juvenile law]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

47.

Van der Nagel

Kiewik

Didden

. (2012). Iedereen gebruikt toch? Handboek LVB en verslaving [Everybody uses, right? Handbook mild intellectual disability and addiction]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Boom.

48.

Van der Put

C. E.

Asscher

J. J.

Stams

G. J. J. M.

Moonen

X. M. H

. (2014). Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58, 992-1003. doi:10.1111/jir.12078

49.

Van der Put

C. E.

Stams

G. J. J. M.

Hoeve

Deković

Spanjaard

H. J. M.

Van der Laan

P. H.

Barnoski

R. P

. (2012). Changes in the relative importance of dynamic risk factors for recidivism during adolescence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 296-316. doi:10.1177/0306624X11398462

50.

Van Heerde

W. K.

Brand

E. F. J. M.

Van ’t Hoff

G. I. C. M.

Mulder

E. A.

(2004). Interbeoordelaarsbetrouwbaarheid en convergente validiteit van de Profiel Justitiële Jeugdlijst [Inter-rater reliability and convergent validity of the Juvenile Forensic Profile]. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Ministerie van Justitie, Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen.

51.

Van Heerde

W. K.

Mulder

E. A

. (2005). Rapport PIJ-dossiers 2003-B. Praktijkevaluatie FPJ-lijst & SAVRY te Eikenstein en FORA [Research study PIJ-files 2003-B. Clinical evaluation FPJ-list & SAVRY in Eikenstein and FORA]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Department of Justice, National Agency of Correctional Institutions.

52.

Van Marle

(2004). Hulpverlening of justitie: Keuzes in de zorg voor verstandelijk gehandicapten [Care or justice: Choices in the care for mentally handicapped]. In Geus

Roelvink

(Eds.), Verstandelijk gehandicapten in aanraking met politie en justitie: Verslag van een congres (pp. 43-56). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn.

53.

Van Nieuwenhuijzen

Orobio de Castro

Wijnroks

Vermeer

Matthys

. (2004). The relations between intellectual disabilities, social information processing, and behavior problems. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 215-229.

54.

Van Nieuwenhuijzen

Vriens

Scheepmaker

Smit

Porton

. (2011). The development of a diagnostic instrument to measure social information processing in children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 358-370.

55.

Wade

Llewellyn

Matthews

(2008). Review of parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21, 351-366.

56.

West

D. J.

Farrington

D. P.

(1973). Who becomes delinquent? Second report of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. London, England: Heinemann Educational.

57.

Wong

S. C. P.

Hare

R. D.

(2005). Guidelines for a psychopathy treatment program. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

58.

Yun

Lee

(2013). IQ and delinquency: The differential detection hypothesis revisited. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11, 196-211. doi:10.1177/1541204012463410