Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-1
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Efficacy for Reducing Recidivism Rates of Moderate- and High-Risk Sexual Offenders: A Scoping Systematic Literature Review
This literature scoping review compared recidivism rates of moderate- and high-risk sexual offenders who received cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) oriented treatments. Ten empirical studies from 2001 to 2014 were selected for review that met the following criteria: (a) Treatment program included a CBT-based intervention with a comparative intervention; (b) participants included adult, male, moderate- and high-risk sexual offenders only; and (c) follow-up data for up to 12 months. Data were analyzed using a summative metric for recidivism rate comparisons (N = 3,073 for CBT and N = 3,588, for comparison approaches). Sexual offense recidivism rates varied from 0.6% to 21.8% (with CBT) and from 4.5% to 32.3% (with comparison intervention). The within-sample median rate of violent recidivism with a history of sexual offense was 21.1% (with CBT) versus 32.6% (comparison). Sexual offenders had a general felonies (within-sample) median recidivism rate of 27.05% (with CBT) versus 51.05% (comparison). The evidence supports the conclusion that CBT in its various forms is an efficacious treatment modality to prevent offense recidivism by sexual offenders. Suggestions for future research are considered.
AbrahamsN.DenvriesK.WattsC.PallitoC.PetzoldM.ShamuS.Garcia-MorenoC. (2015). Prevalence of non-partner sexual violence: A review of global data. In DonnelyP. D.WardC. L. (Eds.), Violence prevention: Epidemiology, evidence and policy (pp. 49-56). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AllamJ. (1999). Effective practice in work with sex offenders: A re-conviction study comparing treated and untreated offenders. Birmingham: UK: West Midlands Probation Service, Sex Offender Unit.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1999). Dangerous sex offenders: A task force report of the American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC: Author.
4.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.WormithJ. S. (2011). Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735-755.
5.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methods, 8(1), 19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Recorded crime, Australia, 2012 (Catalogue No. 4530.0). Canberra: Author.
7.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013a). Crime victimisation, Australia 2011-2012 (Catalogue No. 4530.0). Canberra: Author.
8.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013b). Prisoners in Australia, 2013 (Catalogue No. 4517.0). Canberra: Author.
9.
*AytesK. E.OlsenS. S.ZakrajsekT.MurrayP.IresonR. (2001). Cognitive/behavioral treatment for sexual offenders: An examination of recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 223-231.
10.
AytesK. E.OlsenS. S.ZakrajsekT.MurrayP.IresonR. (2001). Cognitive/behavioral treatment for sexual offenders: An examination of recidivism. Sex Abuse, 13, 223–231.
11.
BakkerL.HudsonS.WalesD.RileyD. (1999). “And there was light”: An evaluation of the Kia Marama Treatment Programme for New Zealand sex offenders against children. Christchurch, New Zealand: Justice Department.
12.
BeechA. R.Mandeville-NordenR.GoodwillA. (2012). Comparing recidivism rates of treatment responders/nonresponders in a sample of 413 child molesters who had completed community-based sex offender treatment in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 29-49. doi:10.1177/0306624X10387811
13.
BerlinJ. (1997). Chemical castration of sex offenders: “A shot in the arm” towards rehabilitation. Whittier Law Review, 19, 169-213.
14.
BurdonW. M.GallagherC. A. (2002). Coercion and sex offenders: Controlling sex-offending behavior through incapacitation and treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 87-109.
15.
ChanH. C.BeauregardE. (2015). Non-homicidal and homicidal sexual offenders: Prevalence of maladaptive personality traits and paraphilic behaviors. Criminology, 52, 21-30.
16.
CraigL. A.BrowneK. D.StringerI. (2003). Treatment and sexual offence recidivism, Trauma. Violence & Abuse, 4, 70-89.
17.
CraissatiJ.SouthR.BiererK. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of community sex offender treatment in relation to risk and re-offending. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 769-784.
18.
*DuweG.GoldmanR. A. (2009). The impact of prison-based treatment on sex offender recidivism: Evidence from Minnesota. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 279-307.
19.
*DwyerJ.SchweitzerR. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1292-1310.
20.
DwyerS. M. (1997). Treatment outcome study: Seventeen years after sexual offender treatment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 92, 149-160.
21.
EllisP. D. (2010). The essential guides to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
*FriendshipC.MannR. E.BeechA. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 744-759.
23.
GalassiA.MpofuE.AthanasouJ. (2015). Therapeutic community treatment of an inmate population with substance-use disorders: Post-release trends in re-arrest, re-incarceration, and drug misuse relapse. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7059-7072. doi:10.3390/ijerph120607059
24.
GallagherC. A.WilsonD.HirschfieldP.CoggeshallM. B.MackenzieD. (1999). A quantitative review of the effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3(4), 19-29.
25.
HallG. C. N. (1995a). The preliminary development of theory-based community treatment for sexual offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 478-483.
26.
HallG. C. N. (1995b). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802-809.
27.
HansonR. K. (2004). Sex offender risk assessment. In HollinC. R. (Ed.), The handbook of offender assessment and treatment (pp. 31-47). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
28.
HarkinsL.BeechA. (2007). Measurement of the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 36-44.
29.
*HansonR. K.BroomI.StephensonM. (2004). Evaluating community sex offender treatment programs: A 12-year follow-up of 724 offenders. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 36, 87-96.
30.
HansonR. K.BussiereM. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual fender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
31.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 169-194.
32.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
33.
HeseltineK.SarreR.DayA. (2011). Prison-based correctional rehabilitation: An overview of intensive interventions for moderate to high-risk offenders (Trends & Issues in Crime and Correctional Justice, No. 412). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
34.
JenningsW. G.PiqueroA. P.ZimringF. F.ReingleJ. M. (2015). Assessing the continuity of sex offending over the life course: Evidence from two large birth cohort studies. In BlocklandA. A. J.LussierP. (Eds.), Sexual offenders: A criminal career approach (pp. 129-143). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
35.
JenningsW. G.ZgobaK.TewksburyR. (2012). A comparative longitudinal analysis of recidivism trajectories and collateral consequences for sex and non-sex offenders released since the implementation of sex offender registration and community notification. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35(3), 356-364. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2012.662062
36.
KimB.BenekosP. J.MerloA. (2016). Sex offender recidivism revisited: Review of recent meta-analysis on the effect of sex offender treatment. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17, 105-117. doi:10.1177/1524838014566719
37.
LandenbergerN.LipseyM. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451-476.
38.
LångströmN.Gabrielle SjöstedtG.GrannM. (2004). Psychiatric disorders and recidivism in sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 139-150.
39.
LevensonJ. S.CotterL. P. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Justice, 21, 49-66.
40.
LipseyM. W.LandenbergerN. A. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral interventions. In WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims, and places (pp.57-71). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
41.
LoselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146.
42.
LoselF.SchmuckerM. (2014). Treatment of sex offenders. In BruinsmaG.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 5323-5332), New York, NY: Springer.
43.
MackenzieD. L.HickmanL. J. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MarquesJ. K.DayD. M.NelsonC.WestM. A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism: Preliminary results of a longitudinal study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 28-54.
45.
*MarquesJ. K.WiederandersM.DayD. M.NelsonC.OmmerenA. V. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s sex offender treatment and evaluation project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79-107.
46.
MarshallW. L.WardT.MannR. E.MouldenH.FernandezY. M.SerranG.MarshallL. E. (2005). Working positively with sexual offenders: Maximizing the effectiveness of treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1096-1114.
47.
MarunaS.MannR. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177.
48.
*McGrathR. J.CummingG.LivingstonJ. A.HokeS. E. (2003). Outcome of a treatment program for adult sex offenders: From prison to community. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 3-17.
49.
MosterA.WnukD. W.JeglicE. L. (2008). Cognitive behavioral therapy interventions with sex offenders. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 14, 109-121.
50.
*OlverM. E.WongS. C. P.NicholaichukT. P. (2009). Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 522-536.
51.
O’ReillyG.CarrA.MurphyP.CotterA. (2010). A controlled evaluation of a prison-based sexual offender intervention program. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 95-111. doi:10.1177/1079063209358107
52.
PolizziD.MackenzieD. L.HickmanL. J. (1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison and non-prison based treatment program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357-372.
53.
*ScaloraM. J.GarbinC. (2003). A multivariate analysis of sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 309-323.
54.
SchmuckerM.LoselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 597-630. doi:10.1007/s11292-015-924-z.
55.
TierneyD. W.McCabeM. P. (2001). The assessment of denial, cognitive distortions, and victim empathy among pedophilic sex offenders: An evaluation of the utility of self-report measures. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2, 259-270.
56.
WaldramJ. B. (2010). Moral agency, cognitive distortion, and narrative strategy in the rehabilitation of sexual offenders. Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology, 38, 251-274.
57.
WareJ.MannR. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 279-288.
58.
WareJ.MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2015). Categorical denial in convicted sex offenders: The concept, its meaning, and its implication for risk and treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 25, 215-226. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.08.003
59.
WestG. (2009). Alternatives to randomized experiments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 299-304.
60.
WilsonM. G.LavisJ. N.GutaA. (2012). Community-based organizations in the health sector: A scoping review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 1(36), 1-9.
61.
WittP. H.GreenfieldD. P.HiscoxS. P. (2008). Cognitive/behavioral approaches to the treatment of adult sex offenders. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 36, 245-270.
62.
WooditchA.TangL. T.TaxmanF. S. (2013). Which criminogenic need changes are most important in promoting desistance from crime and substance use?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 276-299. doi:10.1177/0093854813503543
63.
*ZgobaK. M.SagerW. R.WittP. H. (2003). Evaluation of New Jersey’s sex offender treatment program at the adult diagnostic and treatment center: Preliminary results. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31, 133-164.
