Using administrative data obtained from Queensland Corrective Services, we investigated the composition and sequencing of sex offender treatment and reintegration programs on recidivism outcomes. Outcomes were compared over an average of 4.8 years (SD = 29.20 months; range = 15 days to 9.25 years) on 2,407 adult males convicted of sexual offences and discharged from custody between 2010 and 2017. Controlling for risk, age, treatment location, and cultural heritage, those who completed a combination of preparatory programs, rehabilitation and reintegration programs were less likely to reoffend and had significantly better survival rates when they did reoffend, compared to those who did not complete—or partially completed—programs. However, reintegration programs, regardless of involvement with other correctional programming, also demonstrated success in reducing short-term recidivism. Combined, these findings indicate that the composition and sequencing of correctional programming likely plays an important role in enhancing outcomes and that engagement in reintegration programs post-incarceration may be pivotal to improving the outcomes for men convicted of sexual offences. Such sequencing, and program composition, warrants further investigation.
AllardT.Rayment-McHughS.AdamsD.SmallboneS.McKillopN. (2016). Responding to youth sexual offending: A field-based practice model that ‘closes the gap’ on sexual recidivism among Indigenous and non-Indigenous males. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 22(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.1003107
2.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ.HogeR. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
4.
ArnettJ. J. (2001). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood: perspectives from adolescence through midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 8(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026450103225
5.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). New York: Routledge, Taylor, and Francis Group. ISBN 9781138935778.
6.
CornishD.ClarkeR. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators, and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In M. J. Smith & D. B. Cornish (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention studies, vol. 16 (pp. 41–96). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press. Available: https://live-cpop.ws.asu.edu/sites/default/files/Responses/crime_prevention/PDFs/Cornish&Clarke.pdf
DayA.RossS.CaseyS.VessJ.JohnsD.HobbsG. (2019). The intensity and timing of sex offender treatment. Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217745069
9.
DuweG. (2018). The effects of the timing and dosage of correctional programming on recidivism. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 57(3–4), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1401025
10.
GannonT. A.OlverM. E.MallionJ. S.JamesM. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
11.
HansonR.BussièreM. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
12.
HansonR. K. (2001). Age and sexual recidivism: A comparison of rapists and child molesters. (user report No. 2001–01). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
13.
HansonR. K.BourgonG.HelmusL.HodgsonS. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809338545
14.
HansonR. K.GordonA.HarrisA. J. R.MarquesJ. K.MurphyW. D.QuinseyV. L.SetoM. C. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320201400207
15.
HeseltineK.DayA.SarreR. (2011). Prison-based correctional offender rehabilitation programs: The 2009 national picture in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
16.
JohnsonL. L.ShihJ. H. (2007). Chapter 20 - An introduction to survival analysis. In GallinJ. I.OgnibeneF. P. (Eds.), Principles and practice of clinical research (pp. 273–282). Elsevier: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-369440-9.X5000-2
17.
LångströmN.EnebrinkP.LaurénE. M. (2013). Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions. BMJ, 347, f4630. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4630
18.
LowenkampC. T.LatessaE. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders [Technical report]. Topics in community corrections, 2004 (pp. 3–8). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
19.
LöselF.LinkW.SchmuckerM.BenderD. (2020). Of the effectives of sexual offender treatment in prisons: A comparison of two different evaluation designs in routine practice. Sexual Abuse, 32(4), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871576
20.
LöselF.SchmuckerM. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7
21.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2021). A cost–benefit analysis of a treatment program for adult males who have offended sexually. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 27(3), 131–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2021.1934133
22.
MarshallW. L.SerranG.FernandezY. M.MulloyR.MannR. E.ThorntonD. (2003). Therapist characteristics in the treatment of sexual offenders: tentative data on their relationship with indices of behavior change. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 9(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/355260031000137940
23.
MarshallW. L.SerranG.MouldenH.MulloyR.FernandezY. M.MannR. E.ThorntonD. (2002). Therapist features in sexual offender treatment: their reliable identification and influence on behavior change. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9(6), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.335
24.
McKillopN.BrownS.SmallboneS.PritchardK. (2015). Similarities and differences in adolescence-onset versus adulthood-onset sexual abuse incidents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 46, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.02.014
25.
McKillopN.Rayment-McHughS. (2018). Evaluation framework for therapeutic programs delivered within a forensic context: final report prepared for Queensland Corrective Services. USC Australia.
26.
McKillopN.Rayment-McHughS.SmallboneS.BromhamZ. (2018). Understanding and preventing the onset of sexual abuse in adolescence and adulthood. Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice.
27.
McMurranM.TheodosiE. (2007). Is treatment non-completion associated with increased reconviction over no treatment?Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601060374
28.
MorganS.HanleyC.Fa’AosoJ.WalkerC.Rayment-McHughS.AdamsD. (2021). Conversations on practice in criminal justice. In BennettB. (Ed.), Aboriginal fields of practice (pp. 183–196). UK: Red Globe Press.
29.
NathanL.WilsonN.HillmanD. (2003). Te Whakakotahitanga: An evaluation of the Te Piriti Special Treatment Programme for child sex offenders. http:// www.correc tions.govt.nz/research.
30.
OlverM. E.MarshallL. E.MarshallW. L.NicholaichukT. P. (2019). A long-term outcome assessment of the effects on subsequent re-offense rates of a prison-based CBT/RNR sex offender program with strength-based elements. Sexual Abuse, 32(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218807486
PolaschekD. L. L.BlackwoodK. M. (2018). Treating sex offenders in prison. In WooldredgeJ.SmithP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on prisons and imprisonment (pp. 473–501). New York, NY: OUP.
33.
Rayment-McHugh, S., Belton, E., McKillop, N., Christensen, L., Prenzler, T., & Hine, L. (under review). Beyond ‘what works’: implementing sex offender treatment programs in the ‘real world’. Manuscript under review.
34.
SchaeferL. (2018). Environmental corrections: An application of environmental criminological theories to community corrections practices. Advancing Corrections Journal, 5, 22–33.
35.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2015). The effects of sexual offender treatment on recidivism: An international meta-analysis of sound quality evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 597–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9241-z
36.
SchmuckerM.LöselF. (2017). Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Belfast: The Campbell Collaboration.
37.
SimourdD. J.OlverM. (2019). Prescribed correctional treatment dosage: cautions, commentary, and future directions. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 58(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2018.1562503
38.
SmallboneS.McHughM. (2010). Outcomes of Queensland Corrective Services Sexual Offender Treatment Programs: Final Report. Available at: final report link.
39.
SmallboneS. W.CrissmanB.Rayment-McHughS. (2009). Improving therapeutic engagement with adolescent sexual offenders. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 27, 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.905
40.
SofronoffW. (2016). Queensland Parole System Review: Final Report. https://parolereview.premiers.qld.gov.au/assets/queensland-parole-system-review-final-report.pdf.
41.
SpjeldnesS.GoodkindS. (2009). Gender differences and offender reentry: A review of the literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(4), 314–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670902850812
42.
ThompsonC.StewartA. (2007). Risk of reoffending prison version (RoR-PV) screening tool administration manual. Justice Modelling @Griffith, Griffith University.
43.
ThompsonC.StewartA. (2016). Revalidation of the Risk of Reoffending (RoR) Tools. Consultancy Report, Queensland Corrective Services.
VisherC. A.LattimoreP. K.BarrickK.TuellerS. (2017). Evaluating the long-term effects of prisoner reentry services on recidivism: what types of services matter?Justice Quarterly, 34(1), 136–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1115539
46.
WilsonR.CortoniF.VermaniM. (2007). Circles of support and accountability: A national replication of outcome findings. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
