Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Since first appearing in the late 1980s, drug courts have quickly become one of the leading intervention strategies for offenders exhibiting problems with drug abuse. Popular with policy makers for their innovative approach to breaking the drugs-crime nexus, drug courts are now considered one of the hallmarks of both the adult and juvenile justice systems of corrections. Empirical research has indicated that drug courts are one of the most promising contemporary correctional strategies in reducing recidivism among substance abusing offenders. This study examined a juvenile drug court in an effort to answer some recent research questions that have been proffered by empiricists. Results suggested that clients with a history of mental health problems had greater odds of being admitted to the drug court. No client characteristics, however, were predictive of client success in the drug court. Policy implications are also considered.

Keywords

juvenile drug court mental health status drug court admissions drug court outcomes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American University. (2001). Juvenile drug court activity update: Summary information. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project .

Belenko, S. ( 1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1, 1-42.

Belenko, S. ( 2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.

Bouffard, J. , & Taxman, F. ( 2004). Looking inside the ‘‘Black Box’’ of drug court treatment services using direct observations. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 195-218.

Butts, J.A. , & Roman, J. ( 2004). Drug courts in the juvenile justice system. In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile Drug Courts and Teen Substance Abuse (pp. 1-25). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

Cissner, A.B. , & Rempel, M. ( 2005). The state of drug court research: Moving beyond ‘‘do they work?’’ New York: Center for Court Innovation.

Fischer, M. , Geiger, B. , & Hughes, M.E. ( 2007). Female recidivists speak about their experience in drug court while engaging in appreciative inquiry International. Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 703-722.

Finn, P. , & Newlyn, A.K. ( 1993). Miami’s ‘‘drug court:’’ A different approach. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

Goldkamp, J. ( 2003). The impact of drug courts. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 197-206.

10.

Goldkamp, J. , White, M.D. , & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 27-72.

11.

Gottfredson, D.C. , Najaka, S.S. , & Kearley, B. ( 2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 171-196.

12.

Harrell, A. ( 2003). Judging drug courts: Balancing the evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 207-212.

13.

Huddleston, C.W. , Freeman-Wilson, K. , Marlowe, D.B. , & Roussell, A.P. (2005). Painting the current picture: A National report card on drug courts and other problem solving courts, I(2) . Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute, National Association of Drug Court Professionals.

14.

Longshore, D. , Turner, S. , Wenzel, S. , Morral, A. , Harrell, A. , McBride, D. , et al. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7-25.

15.

Marlowe, D.B. , DeMatteo, D.S. , & Festinger, D.S. (2003). A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 16, 153-157.

16.

Marlowe, D.B. , Festinger, D.S. , Lee, P.A. , Dugosh, K.L. , & Benasutti, K.M. (2006a). Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency , 52, 52-76.

17.

Marlowe, D.B. , Heck, C. , Huddleston, C.W. , & Casebolt, R. ( 2006b). A national research agenda for drug courts: Plotting the course for second-generation scientific inquiry. Drug court review: Special research Edition, 2, 1-32.

18.

Miller, J.M. , Miller, H.V. , & Barnes, J.C. ( 2007). The effect of demeanor on drug court admission. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 18, 246-259.

19.

National Institute of Justice. (2006). Drug courts: The second decade. Washington, DC: Author.

20.

Roman, J. , & DeStefano, C. ( 2004). Drug court effects and the quality of existing evidence . In J. A. Butts & J. Roman (Eds.), Juvenile drug courts and teen substance abuse (pp. 107-135.). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.

21.

Roman, J. , Townsend, W. , & Bhati, A. ( 2003). National estimates of drug court recidivism. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

Identifying Leading Characteristics Associated with Juvenile Drug Court Admission and Success

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References