This article offers a long overdue comprehensive review of the literature on the effectiveness of temporary release programs for prisoners. Following an account of how the public and criminal justice workers view temporary release, and against the “nothing works” proposition, it is shown that while in the community, prisoners tend to spend their time constructively and comply with the rules and regulations of temporary release; both home leave and work release schemes can be effective in reducing recidivism rates, and work release in particular may also enhance postrelease employment prospects.
Anderson, D.C. (1995). Crime and the politics of hysteria: How the Willie Horton story changed American justice. New York: Random Justice.
4.
Atkinson, D., Fenster, C.A., & Blumberg, A.S. (1976). Employer attitudes toward work-release programs and the hiring of offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 335-344.
5.
Bagdon, W., & Ryan, J.E. (1993). Intensive supervision of offenders on pre-release furlough: An evaluation of the Vermont experience. Forum on Corrections Research, 5, 29-31.
6.
Bammann, K., & Feest, J. (2004). The correctional system in the Federal Republic of Germany. In J. A. Winterdyk (Ed.), Adult corrections: International systems and perspectives (pp. 131-158). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
7.
Bennett, J.V. (1970). I chose prison. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
8.
Bottoms, A.E. (1980). An introduction to "the coming crisis." In A. E. Bottoms & R. H. Preston (Eds.), The coming penal crisis: A criminological and theological exploration (pp. 1-24). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
9.
Boydell, C.L., Startup, J.B., & Teevan, J.L. (1981). An evaluation of farmers' attitudes towards a tobacco work release program. Canadian Journal of Criminology , 23, 459-468.
10.
Cheliotis, L.K. (2005). The Prison Furlough Program in Greece: Findings from a research project in the Male Prison of Korydallos. Punishment and Society: The International Journal of Penology, 7, 201-215.
11.
Cheliotis, L.K. (2006a). Demystifying risk management: A process evaluation of the prisoners' home leave scheme in Greece. Criminology and Criminal Justice: An International Journal, 6, 163-195.
12.
Cheliotis, L.K. (2006b). How iron is the iron cage of new penology? The role of human agency in the implementation of criminal justice policy. Punishment and Society: The International Journal of Penology, 8, 313-340.
13.
Cheliotis, L.K. (2007). Temporary release. In Y. Jewkes & J. Bennett (Eds.), Dictionary of prisons and punishment (pp. 288-290). Cullompton , UK: Willan.
14.
Cheliotis, L.K. (in press). Reconsidering the effectiveness of temporary release: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior.
15.
Cohen, S. (1979). The punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social control. Contemporary Crises, 3, 341-363.
16.
Coleman, C., & Moynihan, J. (1996). Understanding crime data: Haunted by the dark figure. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
17.
Creighton, S., & King, V. (2000). Prisoners and the law. London : Butterworths.
18.
Crispino, L. (1974). The temporary absence program for employment: A study of benefits. Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Correctional Services.
19.
Cullen, F.T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology , 43, 1-42.
20.
Cullen, F.T., Fisher, B.S., & Applegate, B.K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
21.
Cuppleditch, L., & Evans, W. (2005). Re-offending of adults: Results from the 2002 cohort. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 25/05. London : HMSO.
22.
Duffee, D., & Ritti, R.R. (1977). Correctional policy and public values. Criminology, 14, 449-460.
23.
Dünkel, F., & Rössner, D. (2001). Germany. In D. van Zyl Smit & D. Dünkel (Eds.), Imprisonment today and tomorrow: International perspectives on prisoners' rights and prison conditions. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
24.
Farrington, D.P., & Petrosino, A. (2001). The Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group . Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science , 578, 35-49.
25.
Feest, J., & Lesting, W. (2005). Der Angriff auf die Lockerungen: Daten und Überlegungen zur Lockerungspolitik der Länder [The assault on the relaxations of supervision: Data and reflections on state policies for the relaxation of supervision] . Zeitschrift für Strafvollzug und Straffälligenhilfe, 54, 76-82.
26.
Fishman, L.T. (1988). Prisoners and their wives: Marital and domestic effects of telephone contacts and home visits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 55-66.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
Grant, B.A., & Millson, W.A. (1998). The temporary absence program: A descriptive analysis (Research Rep. No. R-66). Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada.
30.
Grosch, O. (1995). Lockerungen im Jugendstrafvollzup: Grundlagen und Praxis [Relaxations of supervision in juvenile corrections: Foundations and practice]. Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Strafrecht .
31.
Grupp, S.E. (1967). Work release: The sheriff's viewpoint. Crime & Delinquency, 13, 513-520.
32.
Gwiasda, G.W. (2001). Network news coverage of campaign advertisements: Media's ability to reinforce campaign messages. American Politics Research, 29, 461-482.
33.
Hassin, Y. (1977). Prisoners' furlough: A reassessment. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 5, 171-178.
34.
Herrick, E. (1989). Over 20,000 inmates on work release in U.S. Corrections Compendium, 14, 9-22.
35.
Holt, N. (1969). California's pre-release furlough program for state prisoners: An empirical evaluation (Research Rep. No. 38). Sacramento, CA: Department of Corrections.
36.
Home Office. (2003a). Prison statistics England and Wales 2001. London: HMSO.
37.
Home Office. (2003b). Prison statistics England and Wales 2002. London: HMSO.
38.
Hudson, B. (2003). Justice in the risk society. London: Sage.
39.
Jamieson, K. (2003). The paradox of political ads: Reform depends on voter savvy [Online]. Retrieved December 4, 2003, from http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/article87.html
40.
Jensen, W., & Geigold, W.C. (1976). Finding jobs for ex-offenders: A study of employers' attitudes. American Business Law Journal, 21, 195-225.
41.
Jürgensen, P., & Rehn, G. (1980). Urlaub aus der Haft [Furloughs from prison]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 63, 231-241.
42.
King, R.D., & McDermott, K. (1995). The state of our prisons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
Langan, P., & Levin, D. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
44.
Liebling, A. (1989). Temporary release: Getting embroiled with prisons . Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 51-55.
45.
Liebling, A., & Maruna, S. (Eds.). (2005). The effects of imprisonment . Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan .
46.
Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger.
47.
MacKenzie, D.L., & DeLi, S. (2002). The impact of formal and informal social controls on the criminal activities of probationers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 243-276.
48.
Marks, A. (1993). How quickly they forget, if they ever knew. Psychological Reports, 72, 1337-1338.
49.
Maruna, S., & King, A. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. In A. Bottoms, S. Rex, & G. Robinson (Eds.), Alternatives to prison: Options for an insecure society (pp. 83-111). Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan.
50.
Maruna, S., & LeBel, T.P. (2002). Revisiting ex-prisoner re-entry: A buzzword in search of a narrative. In S. Rex & M. Tonry (Eds.), Reform and punishment: The future of sentencing (pp. 158-180). Cullompton, Devon, UK: Willan.
51.
McEvoy, K., O'Mahony, D., Horner, C., & Lyner, O. (1999). The home front: The families of politically motivated prisoners in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology , 39, 175-197.
52.
McLeod, J.R. (1999). The sociodrama of presidential politics: Rhetoric, ritual, and power in the era of teledemocracy. American Anthropologist , 101, 359-373.
53.
Mendelberg, T. (1997). Executing Hortons: Racial crime in the 1988 presidential campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 134-157.
54.
Ministère de la justice. (2004). Les chiffres clés de l'administration pénitentiaire [Key figures regarding prison administration]. Paris: Author.
55.
Monger, M. (1967). Casework in after-care. London : Butterworths.
56.
Moore, J.N., & Grupp, S.E. (1979). Work release administrators' views of work release . Offender Rehabilitation, 3, 193-206.
57.
Motiuk, L.L., & Belcourt, R.L. (1996). Temporary absence program participation and the release of federal offenders (Research Rep. No. 51). Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada.
58.
National Centre on Institutions and Alternatives (NCIA). (1989). Survey of state work release and furlough Programs . Alexandria, VA: Author.
59.
Newburn, T., & Jones, T. (2005). Symbolic politics and penal populism: The long shadow of Willie Horton. Crime, Media, Culture, 1, 72-87.
60.
Northern IrelandPrison Service. (2004). Annual report and accounts 2003-2004. London: The Stationery Office.
61.
Osborne, W.N. (1995). Validation of a Virginia work release risk prediction model: A methodology for the improvement of the reliability of correctional decision makers. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
62.
Penal Affairs Consortium. (1995). The reduction of home leave and temporary release opportunities. London: Penal Affairs Consortium.
63.
Perk Davis, S. (1991). Number of furloughs increasing-success rates high . Corrections Compendium, 16, 10-21.
64.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 281-336). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
Pooley, R. (1974). Work release programs and corrections: Goals and deficits. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 62-72.
66.
Rikosseuraamusvirasto. (2003). Vankehoidon ja kriminaalihuollon tilastoja 2003 [The statistics of prison administration and probation administration of Finland in 2003]. Helsinki, Finland: Author.
67.
Roberts, J.V. (2002). Public opinion and the nature of community penalties: International findings. In J. V. Roberts & M. Hough (Eds.), Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice (pp. 33-62). Cullompton , Devon, UK: Willan.
68.
Roberts, J.V., & Stalans, L. (1997). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
69.
Rodgers, B.E. (1978). Inmate response to the home furlough program: The reactions of female offenders to temporary release from incarceration. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Albany.
70.
Rodgers McCarthy, B. (1980). Inmate mothers: The problems of separation and reintegration. Journal of Offender Counselling, Services and Rehabilitation, 4, 199-212.
71.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing "advanced" liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37-64). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
Ryan, J.E. (1997). Who gets revoked? A comparison of intensive community supervision successes and failures in Vermont. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 104-118.
73.
Sacks, M.J. (1975). Making work release work: Convincing the employer . Crime & Delinquency, 21(3), 255-265.
74.
Saipe, A.L. (1973). Federal prison industries: A survey of private senior executives' attitudes. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 15, 74-82.
75.
Sasson, T. (2000). William Horton's long shadow: "Punitiveness" and "managerialism" in the penal politics of Massachusetts, 1988-1997. In R. Sparks & T. Hope (Eds.), Crime, risk and insecurity: Law and order in everyday life and political discourse (pp. 238-251). London: Routledge.
76.
Smith, D.L., & McCurdy Lipsey, C. (1976). Public opinion and penal policy. Criminology, 14, 113-124.
77.
Smith, R.R., & Sabatino, D.A. (1990). American prisoner home furloughs. Journal of Offender Counselling, 10, 18-25.
78.
Sparks, R. (2000). The media and penal politics. Punishment and Society, 2, 98-105.
79.
Toch, H. (1967). Prison inmates' reactions to furlough. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4, 248-262.
80.
Tonry, M. (1990). Stated and latent functions of ISP. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 174-191.
81.
Tonry, M. (1997). Intermediate sanctions in sentencing guidelines . Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
82.
Turner, S., & Petersilia, J. (1996). Work release in Washington: Effects on recidivism and correction costs. The Prison Journal , 76, 138-164.
83.
Van Voorhis, P. (1987). Correctional effectiveness: The high cost of ignoring success. Federal Probation, 51, 59-62.
84.
Walmsley, R. (2003). Further developments in the prison systems of Central and Eastern Europe: Achievements, problems and objectives (HEUNI Publication Series No. 41). Helsinki, Finland: HEUNI.
85.
Walmsley, R. (2007). World prison population list (6th ed.). London: International Centre for Prison Studies, King's College.
86.
Whitehead, P., Turner, N., & Wheatley, J. (1991). Probation, temporary release schemes and reconviction: Theory and practice. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
