A follow-up study of 19,955 releases from Irish prisons shows interesting variation in rates of recidivism. Prisoners who, during their sentences, were occasionally allowed to venture outside for vocational or family-related purposes were significantly less likely to be reimprisoned. This held true up to 4 years after their eventual release and is a clear empirical demonstration of the benefits, other than humanitarian, of maintaining prisoners' social capital.
Cheliotis, L.K. (2005). The prison furlough programme in Greece: Findings from a research project in the male prison of Korydallos. Punishment and Society, 7(2), 201-215.
2.
Cid, J. (2005). The penitentiary system in Spain: The use of imprisonment, living conditions and rehabilitation. Punishment and Society , 7(2), 147-166.
Jeffery, R., & Woolpert, S. (1974). Work furlough as an alternative to incarceration: An assessment of its effects on recidivism and social cost. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 65(3), 405-415.
5.
Lally, C. (2006, December 23). Macarthur to be released for brief period. Irish Times, http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2006/1223/1166138388514.html
6.
O'Donnell, I. (2004). Imprisonment and penal policy in Ireland. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 253-266.
7.
O'Donnell, I., Baumer, E.P., & Hughes, N. (2008). Recidivism in the Republic of Ireland. Criminology & Criminal Justice8(2), 123-146.
8.
Roberts, J. (2004). The community prison: Community custody and the evolution of imprisonment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Wartna, B.S.J., & Nijssen, L.T.J. (2006). National studies on recidivism: An inventory of large-scale recidivism research in 33 European countries. The Hague, Netherlands: WODC.
