This study proposes a virtual reality (VR)-based teaching platform for engineering graduate students specializing in heavy equipment. It addresses the challenges of separating theoretical teaching from practical applications and ensures safe practices. The platform facilitates six key processes: VR teaching, VR practice, prototype production, VR monitoring and development, theoretical model establishment, and industrial applications. This approach enables students to become familiar with various processes, including teaching, practical experience, and scientific research applications. A production-study-research-use framework is used to improve the quality of graduate student education and enhance collaboration between educators, students, and enterprises in completing engineering and research projects. Long-term observations demonstrate significant enhancements in the graduate students’ practical abilities, basic skills, and multidisciplinary design. Moreover, the platform effectively addresses key challenges in intelligent coal mining, providing a solution to the separation of teaching, practice, and scientific research, surpassing traditional teaching methods.
ZhangCChenY. A review of research relevant to the emerging industry trends: Industry 4.0, IoT, blockchain, and business analytics. J of Ind Integr Manage2020; 5: 165–180.
2.
QiQTaoF. Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access2018; 6: 3585–3593.
3.
CoşkunSKayıkcıYGençayE. Adapting engineering education to industry 4.0 vision. Technologies2019; 7: 10.
4.
GarcíaÁBregonAMartínez-PrietoMA. Towards a connected digital twin learning ecosystem in manufacturing: enablers and challenges. Comput Ind Eng2022; 171: 108463.
5.
HaliliSH. Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online J of Dist Educ and e-Learn2019; 7: 63–69.
6.
CiolacuMIMihailescuBRachbauerT, et al.Fostering engineering education 4.0 paradigm facing the pandemic and VUCA world. Procedia Comput Sci2023; 217: 177–186.
7.
ChuYB. A mobile augmented reality system to conduct electrical machines laboratory for undergraduate engineering students during the COVID pandemic. Educ Inf Technol2022; 27: 8519–8532.
8.
MirandaJNavarreteCNoguezJ, et al.The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: three case studies in engineering education. Comput Electr Eng2021; 93: 107278.
9.
MansorNAAbdullahNRahmanHA. Towards electronic learning features in education 4.0 environment: literature study. Ind J of Electr Eng Comput Sci2020; 19: 442–450.
10.
Al-MaskariAAl RiyamiTGhnimiS.Factors affecting students’ preparedness for the fourth industrial revolution in higher education institutions. J of Appl Res in Higher Educ2022; 16: 246–264.
11.
HonyszRDobrzańskiLA. Virtual laboratory methodology in scientific researches and education. J of Achieve in Mater Manuf Eng2017; 2: 76–84.
12.
MaJJaradatRAshourO, et al.Efficacy investigation of virtual reality teaching module in manufacturing system design course. J of Mech Des, Trans of the ASME2019; 141: 012002.
13.
WangCTangYKassemMA, et al.Application of VR technology in civil engineering education. Comput Appl Eng Educ2022; 30: 335–348.
14.
GutiérrezJRLPoncePMolinaA. Real-time power electronics laboratory to strengthen distance learning engineering education on smart grids and microgrids. Future Internet2021; 13: 237.
15.
XiangSWangLC. VGLS: a virtual geophysical laboratory system based on C# and viustools and its application for geophysical education. Comput Appl Eng Educ2017; 25: 335–344.
16.
SolmazSKesterLVan GervenT. An immersive virtual reality learning environment with CFD simulations: unveiling the virtual garage concept. Educ Inf Technol2023; 29: 1455–1488.
17.
LiuGCKoCH. Exploring multiple application scenarios of visual communication course using deep learning under the digital twins. Comput Intell Neurosci2022; 2022: 1–11.
18.
ZhaoQXiongCLiuK, et al.Cultivation design of applied undergraduates’ engineering innovation ability based on virtualization technology. Wirel Commun Mob Comput2022; 2022: 1–14.
19.
RasheedGKhanMMalikN, et al.Measuring learnability through virtual reality laboratory application: a user study. Sustain (Switzerland)2021; 13: 10812.
20.
GómezEMarescaPCajaJ, et al.Developing a new interactive simulation environment with macromedia director for teaching applied dimensional metrology. Measure: J of the Int Measure Confederation2011; 44: 1730–1746.
21.
TrySPanuwatwanichKTanapornraweekitG, et al.Virtual reality application to aid civil engineering laboratory course: a multicriteria comparative study. Comput Appl Eng Educ2021; 29: 1771–1792.
22.
QuSYHuTWuJL, et al.Experimental teaching centre platform “new engineering” practice teaching mode. Eurasia J of Math, Sci Technol Educ2017; 13: 4271–4279.
23.
PerdukovaDFedorP. Virtual laboratory for the study of technological process automation. Int J Eng Educ2013; 29: 230–238.
24.
AndújarJMMejiasAMarquezMA. Augmented reality for the improvement of remote laboratories: an augmented remote laboratory. IEEE Trans Educ2011; 54: 492–500.
25.
TawfikMSancristobalEMartínS, et al.VISIR: experiences and challenges. Int J of Online Eng2012; 8: 25–32.
26.
SamalaADAmandaM. Immersive learning experience design (ILXD): augmented reality mobile application for placing and interacting with 3D learning objects in engineering education. Int J of Interac Mobile Technol2023; 17: 22–35.
27.
RuedaCJAGodínesJCVRudmanPD. Categorizing the educational affordances of 3-dimensional immersive digital environments. J of Inf Technol Educ: Innovat in Pract2018; 17: 83–112.
28.
SanfilippoFBlazauskasTSalviettiG, et al.A perspective review on integrating VR/AR with haptics into STEM education for multi-sensory learning†. Robotics2022; 11: 41.
29.
HajirasouliABanihashemiSSandersP, et al.BIM-enabled virtual reality (VR)-based pedagogical framework in architectural design studios. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment2023; ahead-of-print. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2022-0149.
30.
HuangHHwangGJJongMSY. Technological solutions for promoting employees’ knowledge levels and practical skills: an SVVR-based blended learning approach for professional practice. Comput Educ2022; 189.
31.
NadeemMLalMCenJ, et al.AR4FSM: Mobile augmented reality application in engineering education for finite-state machine understanding. Educ Sci2022: 12.
32.
OdehSShanabSAAnabtawiM. Augmented reality internet labs versus its traditional and virtual equivalence. Int J of Emerg Technol in Learn2015; 10: 4–9.
33.
LynSYanFSunQ. Influence of virtual reality (VR) technology on the teaching effect of engineering practical practice. J of Eng Sci Technol Rev2022; 15: 142–148.
34.
LiJLiYBaoH, et al.An empirical study of the virtual simulation system teaching method in NC machining. Int J Technol Human Interact2020; 16: 109–123.
35.
FranklinSPeatM. Virtual versus real: an argument for maintaining diversity in the learning environment. Int J of Continuing Eng Educ and Life-Long Learn2005; 15: 67–78.
36.
UdeozorCToyodaRRusso AbegãoF, et al.Perceptions of the use of virtual reality games for chemical engineering education and professional practice. Higher Education Pedagogies2021; 6: 175–194.
37.
HeD. Teaching practices of a warehousing management curriculum based on virtual reality simulation technology. Int J of Emerg Technol in Learn2022; 17: 96–109.
38.
SeifanMRobertsonNBerenjianA. Use of virtual learning to increase key laboratory skills and essential non-cognitive characteristics. Educ Chem Eng2020; 33: 66–75.
39.
SinghGMantriASharmaO, et al.Virtual reality learning environment for enhancing electronics engineering laboratory experience. Comput Appl Eng Educ2021; 29: 229–243.
40.
ElgewelyMHNadimWElKassedA, et al.Immersive construction detailing education: building information modeling (BIM)–based virtual reality (VR). Open House International2021; 46: 359–375.
41.
ZhangYMoH. Reforming the teaching of engineering cost budgeting majors by integrating VR and bim technology under the internet of things. Sec and Commun Netw2022; 2022.
42.
LiYLuXYuC, et al.Research and application of the virtual simulation system teaching method in NC machining course. Inte J of Model, Simul, and Sci Comput2018; 9.
43.
LiYZhangDGuoH, et al.A novel virtual simulation teaching system for numerically controlled machining. Int J Mech Eng Educ2018; 46: 64–82.
44.
AsadMMSherwaniFHassanRB, et al.Workforce safety education and practice for oil and gas industry: a conceptual framework for virtual reality-based HAZFO expert 2.0. J of Eng, Des Technol2021.
45.
XiangQQiuFWangJ, et al.Engineering design and evaluation of the process evaluation method of auto repair professional practice in virtual reality environment. Appl Sci (Switzerland)2022; 12.
46.
López RíosOLechuga LópezLJLechuga LópezG. A comprehensive statistical assessment framework to measure the impact of immersive environments on skills of higher education students: a case study. Int J Interact Des Manuf2020; 14: 1395–1410.
47.
GillAIrwinDToweyD, et al.Lessons post-lockdown: science and engineering education switching to online learning. Int J Mob Learn Org2022; 16: 287–309.
48.
NgDTK. Online lab design for aviation engineering students in higher education: a pilot study. Inter Learn Environ2022.
49.
Román-IbáñezVPujol-LópezFAMora-MoraH, et al.A low-cost immersive virtual reality system for teaching robotic manipulators programming. Sustainability (Switzerland)2018; 10.
50.
TzafestasCSPalaiologouNAlifragisM. Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: comparative experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans Educ2006; 49: 360–369.
51.
VavenkovMV. VR/AR technologies and staff practice for mining industry. Mining Sci Technol (Russian Federation)2022; 7: 180–187.
52.
EstradaJPahedingSYangX, et al.Deep-learning-incorporated augmented reality application for engineering lab practice. Appl Sci (Switzerland)2022; 12.
53.
AlsalehSTepljakovAKoseA, et al.Reimagine lab: bridging the gap between hands-on, virtual and remote control engineering laboratories using digital twins and extended reality. IEEE Access2022; 10: 89924–89943.
54.
XieJYanZWangX. A VR-based interactive teaching and practice environment for supporting the whole process of mining engineering education. Mining Technol: Trans of the Instit of Mining and Metall2023.
55.
Hernández-ChávezMCortés-CaballeroJMPérez-MartínezÁA, et al.Development of virtual reality automotive lab for practice in engineering students. Sustainability (Switzerland)2021: 13.
56.
HuMJiJDuanJ, et al.Distributed wind power virtual simulation experiment system for cultivating the ability to solve complex engineering problems. Comput Appl Eng Educ2021; 29: 1441–1452.
57.
WuFYLuWSWangXY, et al.Enhanced virtual reality plant: development and application in chemical engineering education. Int J of Emerg Technol in Learn2022; 17: 205–220.
58.
DahlBGrunwaldA. Variation of PBL in higher education within engineering, science and mathematics. Int J Eng Educ38: 934–946.
59.
Sanchez-GomezCA. Implementing a joint learning method (PBL and EBL) to innovate the development of mechanical engineering technical and non-technical skills. Int J Mech Eng Educ50: 176–196.
60.
ZhuN. Embedding active learning and design-based projects in a noise and vibration course for the undergraduate mechanical engineering program. Int J Mech Eng Educ50: 78–88.
61.
MaJCooglerKSuhM. Inquiry-based learning: development of an introductory manufacturing processes course based on a mobile inverted pendulum robot. Int J Mech Eng Educ48: 371–390.
62.
XieJLiSWangX. A digital smart product service system and a case study of the mining industry: MSPSS. Adv Eng Inf2022; 53: 101694.
63.
FengZXieJYanZ, et al.An information processing method of software and hardware coupling for VR monitoring of hydraulic support groups. Multimed Tools Appl2023; 82: 19067–19089.
64.
JiaoXXieJWangX, et al.Intelligent decision method for the position and attitude self-adjustment of hydraulic support groups driven by a digital twin system. Measurement (Mahwah N J)2022; 202: 111722.
65.
CaiNXieJWangX, et al.Method for the relative pose reconstruction of hydraulic supports driven by digital twins. IEEE Sensors J2023; 23: 4707–4719.
66.
XieJGeFCuiT, et al.A virtual test and evaluation method for fully mechanized mining production system with different smart levels. Int J of Coal Sci & Technol2022; 9: 41.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
