Cole, Simon
(2001) Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and
Criminal Identity (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
.
2.
Cole, Simon
(2006)
‘Witnessing Creation’
, Social Studies of Science36:
000-000
.
3.
Davis, Percival
&
Dean H. Kenyon
(1993) Of Pandas and People: The Central Question of
Biological Origins (
Richardson, TX: Foundation for Thought and Ethics)
.
4.
Edmond, Gary
(2002)
‘Legal Engineering: Contested Representations of Law, Science
(and Non-science) and Society’
, Social Studies of Science32(3):
371-412
.
5.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(2006)
‘Anti-social Epistemologies’
, Social Studies of Science36:
000-000
.
6.
Fuller, Steve
(2006)
‘A Step Toward the Legalization of Science Studies’
, Social Studies of Science36:
000-000
.
7.
Gorman, Michael
(2006)
‘STS, Ethics, and Knowledge Transfer in the Courtroom: Personal Experiences’
, Social Studies of Science36:
000-000
.
8.
Lambert, Kevin
(2006)
‘Fuller’s Folly, Kuhnian Paradigms, and Intelligent Design’
, Social Studies of Science36:
000-000
.
9.
Laudan, Larry
(1982)
‘Science at the Bar: Causes for Concern’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values7(41):
16-19
.
10.
Lynch, Michael
&
Simon Cole
(2005)
‘Science and Technology Studies on Trial’
, Social Studies of Science35(2):
269-312
.
11.
Marx, Karl
(1963 [1852]) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis
Bonaparte (
New York: International Publishers)
.
12.
Quinn, Philip
(1984) ‘The Philosopher of Science as Expert
Witness’, in
James T. Cushing
,
C. Delany
&
G. Gutting
(eds), Science and Reality: Recent Work in the Philosophy of
Science (
Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press
): 32-53.
13.
Risinger, D. Michael
(2000)
‘Preliminary Thoughts on a Functional Taxonomy of Expertise in a
Post-Kumho World’
, Seton Hall Law Review31:
508-536
.
14.
Ruse, Michael
(1982)
‘Response to the Commentary: Pro Judice’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values7(41):
19-23
.
15.
Ruse, Michael
(1986)
‘Commentary: The Academic as Expert Witness’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values11:
68-73
.
16.
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein
(1994) ‘The Unquiet Judge: Activism Without
Objectivism in Law and Politics’, in
A. Megill
(ed.), Rethinking Objectivity (
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
): 289-312.
17.
Talbot, Margaret
(2005)
‘Letter from Pennsylvania: Darwin in the Dock’
, The New Yorker (5 December 2005):
66-77
. %3C<www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/day15am.html%3E>.
18.
West, John
(2005) ‘Dover in Review, Part I: Is Judge Jones an
Activist Judge?’ posted (23 December) on %3C<www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/dover_in_review_part_1_is_judg.html%3E>.
