Blume, Stuart
(2000)
‘Land of Hope and Glory: Exploring Cochlear Implantation in the Netherlands’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values25(2):
139-166
.
2.
Cole, Simon A.
(2004)
‘Meaning Business in the Legal Arena: A Tentative Vision for STS’
, paper presented at Does STS Mean Business?Oxford, June 30, available at %3C<www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/NR/rdonlyres/DF5A536C-F691-4056-BD7C-ADB610F9B2C3/901/stsbuscole.pdf%3E>.
3.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(2002)
‘Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of History, Philosophy
and Sociology of Science in US Federal Courts’
, Law and Literature14(2):
309-366
.
4.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(2004) ‘The Invisible Branch: The Authority of
Science Studies in Expert Evidence Jurisprudence’, in
G. Edmond
(ed.), Expertise in Regulation and Law (
Aldershot, Hants.: Ashgate
): 197-241.
5.
Fuller, Steve William
(2005) Rebuttal of Dover Expert Reports, Submitted in
Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District, Case No. 04cv2688,
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
.
6.
Galanter, Marc
(1974)
‘Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations
on the Limits of Legal Change’
, Law and Society Review9(1):
95-160
.
7.
Latour, Bruno
(1987) Science in Action. (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
.
8.
Latour, Bruno
(2004)
‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to
Matters of Concern’
, Critical Inquiry30:
225-248
.
9.
Laudan, Larry
(1982)
‘Science at the Bar: Causes for Concern’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values7(41):
16-19
.
10.
Lynch, Michael
(2005)
‘Editorial’
, Social Studies of Science35(6):
835-836
.
11.
Lynch, Michael
&
Simon A. Cole
(2005)
‘STS on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise’
, Social Studies of Science35(2):
269-311
.
12.
Martin, Brian
(1996)
‘Sticking a Needle into Science: The Case of Polio Vaccines and
the Origin of AIDS’
, Social Studies of Science26(2):
245-276
.
13.
Ruse, Michael
(1982)
‘Commentary: The Academic as Expert Witness’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values7(41):
19-23
.
14.
Siegel, David M.
,
Mark Acree
,
Robert Bradley
,
Simon A. Cole
,
David L. Faigman
,
Stephen E. Fiehberget al.
(2006)
‘The Reliability of Latent Print Individualization: Brief of
Amici Curiae submitted on Behalf of Scientists and Scholars by The New
England Innocence Project, Commonwealth v. Patterson’
, Criminal Law Bulletin42(1):
21-51
.
15.
Simon, Stephanie
(2006)
‘Their Own Version of a Big Bang’
, Los Angeles Times (11 February):
A1-A16
.
16.
Stoney, David A.
(2002) ‘Fingerprint Identification: Scientific
Status’, in
D. L. Faigman
,
D. H. Kaye
,
M. J. Saks
&
J. Sanders
(eds), Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert
Testimony (
St Paul, MN: West Publishing Company
): 368-399.
