Cole, Simon
(2004)
‘Meaning Business in the Legal Arena: A Tentative Vision for STS’
, Does STS Mean Business Workshop, Said Business School,
University of Oxford30 June, %3C<www.sbs.ac.uk/htm/faculty_conferences_sts_workshop.asp%3E>.
2.
Collins, H. M.
&
Robert Evans
(2002)
‘The Third Wave of Science Studies’
, Social Studies of Science32:
235-296
.
3.
Edmond, Gary
(2000)
‘Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence’
, Modern Law Review63:
215-261
.
4.
Edmond, Gary
(2001)
‘The Law-Set: The Legal-Scientific Production of Medical Propriety’
, Science, Technology, & Human Values26:
191-226
.
5.
Edmond, Gary
(2002)
‘Legal Engineering: Contested Representations of Law, Science
(and Non-science) and Society’
, Social Studies of Science32:
371-412
.
6.
Edmond, Gary
(2004)
‘Thick Decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and Reasonableness in the
Federal Court of Australia’
, Oceania74:
190-230
.
7.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(1998)
‘Trashing “Junk Science”’
, Stanford Technology Law Review, %3C<http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Articles/98_STLR_3/contents_f.htm%3E>.
8.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(1999)
‘Creating Science: Science, Law and Religion in the Australian
Noah’s Ark Case’
, Public Understanding of Science8:
317-343
.
9.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(2002)
‘Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of History, Philosophy
and Sociology of Science in US Federal Courts’
, Law & Literature14:
309-366
.
10.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(2004a)
‘Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate
and Judicial Attitudes towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation’
, Law & Policy26:
231-257
.
11.
Edmond, Gary
&
David Mercer
(2004b) ‘The Invisible Branch: The Authority of
Science Studies in Expert Evidence Jurisprudence’, in
G. Edmond
(ed), Expertise in Regulation and Law (
Aldershot, Hants.: Ashgate
): 197-241.
12.
Forrest, Barbara
&
Paul R. Gross
(2004) Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of
Intelligent Design? (
New York: Oxford University Press)
.
13.
Fuller, Steve
(2006)
‘A Step Toward the Legalization of Science Studies’
, Social Studies of Science36:
827-834
.
14.
Gieryn, Thomas
,
George Bevins
&
Stephen Zehr
(1985)
‘Professionalization of American Scientists: Public Science in
the Creation/Evolution Trials’
, American Sociological Review50:
392-409
.
15.
Gorman, Michael
(2006)
‘STS, Ethics, and Knowledge Transfer in the Courtroom: Personal Experiences’
, Social Studies of Science36:
861-866
.
16.
Greenawalt, Kent
(2004) Does God Belong in Public Schools? (
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
.
17.
Haltom, William
&
Michael McCann
(2004) Distorting the Law: Politics, Media and the Litigation
Crisis (
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
.
18.
Hay, Douglas
(1975) ‘Property, Authority and the Criminal
Law’, in D. Hay, P. Linebaugh & E.P. Thompson,
Albion’s Fatal Tree (
Harmondsworth, Essex: Penguin)
.
19.
Huber, Peter
(1991) Galileo’s Revenge: Junk Science in the
Courtroom (
New York: Basic Books)
.
20.
Jasanoff, Sheila
(1990) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as
Policy-Makers (
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
.
21.
Jones, Stephen (2005) Creationevolutiondesign website, accessed 26 October
2005, %3C<http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Esejones%3E>.
22.
Lambert, Kevin
(2006)
‘Fuller’s Folly, Kuhnian Paradigms, and Intelligent Design’
, Social Studies of Science36:
835-842
.
23.
Larson, Edward
(1997) Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and
America’s Continuing Debate over Science and Religion (
New York: Basic Books)
.
24.
Latour, Bruno
&
Steve Woolgar
(1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific
Facts (
London: Sage Publications)
.
25.
Levitt, Norman
(2006) ‘Steve Fuller and the Hidden Agenda of
Social Constructivism’, accessed 8 May 2006, %3C<www.talkreason.org/articles/Fuller.cfm%3E>.
26.
Locke, Simon
(1999) Constructing ‘The Beginning’:
Discourses of Creation Science (
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)
.
27.
Lynch, Michael
(1998)
‘The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The OJ Simpson
“Dream Team” and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine’
, Social Studies of Science28:
829-868
.
28.
Lynch, Michael
(2006)
‘From Ruse to Farce’
, Social Studies of Science36:
819-826
.
29.
Lynch, Michael
&
Simon Cole
(2005)
‘STS on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise’
, Social Studies of Science35:
269-311
.
30.
Mercer, David
(2005) ‘Seen But Not Heard: Can STS Shape Policy
in Controversial Areas of Science?’, in
A. Bamme
,
G. Getzinger
&
B. Wieser
(eds), Yearbook of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science,
Technology and Society (
Vienna: Profil
): 351-366.
31.
Mercer, David
(2006) ‘Capturing the Positive Educational
Possibilities of Creation Science Debates?’, in
L. Jones
&
M. Reiss
(eds), Teaching about Scientific Origins: Taking Account of Creationism.
Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education (
New York: Peter Lang
) (In Press).
32.
Rousso, Henry
(2002) The Haunting Past, trans. Ralph Schoolcraft (
Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press)
.
33.
SKAPP
(2003) Daubert: The Most Influential Supreme Court Decision
You’ve Never Heard of (
Boston, MA: Tellus Institute)
.
34.
Turner, Frank
(1980)
‘Public Science in Britain, 1880-1919’
, Isis71:
589-608
.
