The purpose of this study was to examine the collective flow experiences of participants while playing in a Gamelan ensemble. Participants were 15 members of a Gamelan ensemble in Singapore who were prompted to articulate their phenomenological experiences through extensive semi-structured interviews. Their responses were then transcribed and analyzed for emergent themes with initial codes guided by flow and collective flow theories. Three themes emerged from the data: community, chemistry, and collective peak. The Javanese term “ngeli” surfaced from the interviews as a parallel notion to the Western concept of flow. Implications for theory and practice were proffered in light of the findings.
BakkerA. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26–44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001
2.
BishopL. (2018). Collaborative musical creativity: How ensembles coordinate spontaneity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1285. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01285
3.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London, England: SAGE.
CohenS.BodnerE. (2019). Flow and music performance anxiety: The influence of contextual and background variables. Musicae Scientiae. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1029864919838600
6.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (2002). Flow: The classic work on how to achieve happiness. New York, NY: Random House.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LebudaI. (2017). A window into the bright side of psychology: Interview with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13, 810–821. doi:10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1482
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RichG. (1997). Musical improvisation: A systems approach. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 43–66). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
10.
DunbarR. I. M. (2017). Breaking bread: The functions of social eating. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3, 198–211. doi:10.1007/s40750-017-0061-4
11.
FischlerC. (2011). Commensality, society and culture. Social Science Information, 50, 528–548. doi:10.1177/0539018411413963
12.
FreerP. K. (2009). Boys’ descriptions of their experiences in choral music. Research Studies in Music Education, 31, 142–160. doi:10.1177/1321103X09344382
13.
GaggioliA.ChiricoA.MazzoniE.MilaniL.RivaG. (2017). Networked flow in musical bands. Psychology of Music, 45, 283–297. doi:10.1177/0305735616665003
14.
GoldsworthyD. (1997). Teaching gamelan in Australia: Some perspectives on cross-cultural music education. International Journal of Music Education, 30, 3–14. doi:10.1177/025576149703000102
15.
HabeK.BiasuttiM.KajtnaT. (2019). Flow and satisfaction with life in elite musicians and top athletes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 698. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00698
16.
HaddonE. (2016). Bi-musicality and dialogical musicality: Influences of Javanese gamelan participation on Western instrumental learning. British Journal of Music Education, 33, 219–235. doi:10.1017/S0265051716000127
17.
HartE.Di BlasiZ. (2015). Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study. Psychology of Music, 43, 275–290. doi:10.1177/0305735613502374
18.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ. T.RapsonR. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HellerK.BullerjahnC.von GeorgiR. (2015). The relationship between personality traits, flow-experience, and different aspects of practice behavior of amateur vocal students. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1901. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01901
20.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29. doi:10.1038/466029a
21.
HillM.HillB.WalshR. (2018). Conflict in collaborative musical composition: A case study. Psychology of Music, 46, 192–207. doi:10.1177/0305735617704712
22.
JacksonS.CsikszentmihalyiM. (1999). Flow in sport: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Urbana, IL: Human Kinetics.
23.
JocunsA. (2009). Participation structures as a mediational means: Learning Balinese gamelan in the United States through intent participation, mediated discourse, and distributed cognition. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16, 48–36. doi:10.1080/10749030802477341
24.
LeonardK.Hafford-LetchfieldT.CouchmanW. (2013). ‘We’re all going Bali’: Utilising gamelan as an educational resource for leadership and teamwork in post-qualifying education in health and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 173–190. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr166
25.
McIntoshJ. (2013). ‘Seeing the bigger picture’: Experiential learning, applied ethnomusicology and the use of gamelan music in adult literacy education. International Journal of Music Education, 31, 15–25. doi:10.1177/0255761411433718
26.
MikszaP.TanL. (2015). Predicting collegiate wind players’ practice efficiency, flow, and self-efficacy for self-regulation: An exploratory study of relationships between teachers’ instruction and students’ practicing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 162–179. doi:10.1177/0022429415583474
27.
MockrosC.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). The social construction of creative lives. In MontuoriA.PurserR. (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 175–218). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
28.
PayneB. R.JacksonJ. J.NohS. R.Stine-MorrowE. A. (2011). In the zone: Flow state and cognition in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 738–743. doi:10.1037/a0022359
29.
PrivetteG. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1361–1368. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1361
SalanovaM.Rodríguez-SánchezA. M.SchaufeliW. B.CifreE. (2014). Flowing together: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups. The Journal of Psychology, 148, 435–455. doi:10.1080/00223980.2013.806290
32.
SaldañaJ. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
SawyerR. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
SawyerR. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34, 148–165. doi:10.1177/0305735606061850
35.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
SuttonR. C. (2004). Peak performance of groups: An examination of the phenomenon in musical groups (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3150594)
37.
TanL. (2016). Towards an ancient Chinese-inspired theory of music education. Music Education Research, 18, 399–410. doi:10.1080/14613808.2015.1122751
38.
TanL.MikszaP. (2019). Motivational orientations of college band students: A cross-cultural examination of a collective 2 x 2 achievement goal model. Psychology of Music, 47, 33–50. doi:10.1177/0305735617734628
39.
ValenzuelaR.CodinaN. (2014). Habitus and flow in primary school musical practice: Relations between family musical cultural capital, optimal experience and music participation. Music Education Research, 16, 505–520. doi:10.1080/14613808.2013.859660
40.
ValenzuelaR.CodinaN.Vicente PestanaJ. (2018). Self-determination theory applied to flow in conservatoire music practice: The roles of perceived autonomy and competence, and autonomous and controlled motivation. Psychology of Music, 46, 33–48. doi:10.1177/0305735617694502
41.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
42.
WalkerC. J. (2010). Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone?The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 3–11. doi:10.1080/17439760903271116
43.
WillisJ. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
