Despite the current prevalence of users performing musical activities on social media, and on Facebook in particular, little research has examined these behaviors from the perspective of consumer psychology. A cross-sectional, convenience sample of 400 participants (Mage = 22.56, SDage = 7.79) completed an online questionnaire. The findings illustrated that the constructs of opinion leadership, innovativeness, and self-efficacy within the consumer psychology literature were associated with performing music-related activities on Facebook, including the active creation/consumption of music content and use of music listening applications. Thus, music activities performed on Facebook have an overt consumer psychological component. These findings indicate that to understand music-related activities on social media, further research should consider psychological variables in explaining this common and economically important activity.
AgarwalR.KarahannaE. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.
2.
AgarwalR.PrasadJ. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 15–29.
3.
AvdeeffM. (2011). Challenges facing musical engagement and taste in digitality. Situating popular musics: IASPM 16th International Conference Proceedings (pp. 15–23). Grahamstown, South Africa. doi:10.5429/2225–0301.2011.03.
4.
AvdeeffM. (2012). Technological engagement and musical eclecticism: An examination of contemporary listening practices. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 9(2), 265–285.
5.
AvdeeffM. (2014). Young people’s musical engagement and technologies of taste. In BennettA.RobardsB. (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures: The Internet, belonging and new cultural configurations (pp. 130–145). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BaekK.HoltonA.HarpD.YaschurC. (2011). The links that bind: Uncovering novel motivations for linking on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2243–2248. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.003
7.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
8.
BaymN. K. (2007). The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday, 12(8), np.
9.
BaymN. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
10.
BaymN. K. (2018). Playing to the crowd: Musicians, audiences, and the intimate work of connection. New York, NY: NYU Press.
11.
BaymN. K.LedbetterA. (2009). Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12(3), 408–427.
12.
BoydD.EllisonN. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.
13.
BrennerJ.SmithA. (2013). 72% of Online Adults are Social Networking Site Users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
14.
BrewerW. D.RickelsD. A. (2014). A content analysis of social media interactions in the Facebook band directors group. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 201, 7–22.
15.
CayariC. (2011). The YouTube effect: How YouTube has provided new ways to consume, create, and share music. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 12(6), 1–28.
16.
CayariC. (2015). Participatory culture and informal music learning through video creation in the curriculum. International Journal of Community Music, 8(1), 41–57. doi:10.1386/ijcm.8.1.41_1
17.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.SwamiV.CermakovaB. (2012). Individual differences in music consumption are predicted by uses of music and age rather than emotional intelligence, neuroticism, extraversion or openness. Psychology of Music, 40(3), 285–300. doi:10.1177/0305735610381591
18.
ChiouW. B.WanC.-S. (2007). The dynamic change of self-efficacy in information searching on the Internet: Influence of valence of experience and prior self-efficacy. The Journal of Psychology, 141(6), 589–603.
19.
ChoE.KimS. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207–230. doi:10.1177/1094428114555994
20.
ClickM. A.LeeH.HolladayH. W. (2013). Making monsters: Lady Gaga, fan identification, and social media. Popular Music and Society, 36(3), 360–379. doi:10.1080/03007766.2013.798546
21.
CoppaF. (2014). Pop culture, fans, and social media. In HunsingerJ.SenftT. (Eds.), The social media handbook (pp. 76–92). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
FreyneJ.JacoviM.GuyI.GeyerW. (2009). Increasing engagement through early recommender intervention. Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommnder Systems (RecSys’09) (pp. 85–92). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1639714.1639730
23.
FuchsC. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
24.
GangadharbatlaH. (2008). Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and Internet self-efficacy as predictors of the igeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 5–15.
25.
GreenwoodS.PerrinA.DugganM. (2016). Social media update 2016: Facebook usage and engagement is on the rise, while adoption of other platforms holds steady. Pew Research Center, 11November. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/.
HeppA. (2013). Cultures of mediatization. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
28.
HineC. (2005). Virtual methods and the sociology of cyber-social-scientific knowledge. In HineC. (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 1–13). Oxford, UK: Berg.
29.
ImS.BayusB. L.MasonC. H. (2003). An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 61–73. doi:10.1177/0092070302238602
30.
International Federation of the Phonographic Industry. (2016). IFPI global music report: Music consumption exploding worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.ifpi.org/downloads/GMR2016.pdf.
31.
JenkinsH.FordS.GreenJ. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
32.
JoinsonA. N. (2008). ‘Looking at’, ‘looking up’ or ‘keeping up with’ people? Motives and uses of Facebook. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2008 (pp. 1027–1036). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213
33.
JonesS.Johnson-YaleC.MillermaierS.PérezF. S. (2009). U.S. college students’ Internet use: Race, gender and digital divides. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 244–264. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2009.01439.x
34.
JuncoR. (2013). Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 626–631. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.007
35.
KangN. E.YoonW. C. (2008). Age- and experience-related user behavior differences in the use of complicated electronic devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 425–437. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.12.003
KrämerN. C.WinterS. (2008). Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3), 106–116. doi:10.1027/1864–1105.20.3.106
38.
KrauseA. E.NorthA. C. (2016). Music listening in everyday life: Devices, selection methods, and digital technology. Psychology of Music, 44(1), 129–147. doi:10.1177/0305735614559065
39.
KrauseA. E.NorthA. C.HeritageB. (2014). The uses and gratifications of using Facebook music listening applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.001
40.
KrauseA. E.NorthA. C.HeritageB. (2018). Musician interaction via social networking sites: Celebrity attitudes, attachment, and their correlates. Music & Science, 1, 1–11. doi:10.1177/2059204318762923
41.
KruseN. B.VeblenK. K. (2013). Music teaching and learning online. Considering YouTube instructional videos. The Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 5(1), 77–87. doi:10.1386/jmte.5.1.77_1
42.
LeongT. W.VetereF.HowardS. (2005). The serendipity shuffle. In Proceedings of OZCHI, November 23–25 (pp. 1–4). Canberra, Australia: ACM.
43.
LeongT. W.WrightP. (2011). Music in households in the digital economy. Paper presented at the Digital Engagement Conference, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
44.
LeongT. W.WrightP. (2013). Revisiting social practices surrounding music. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 951–960). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2466122
45.
LimH.LeeH.-J. (2010). Development of consumer techno segmentation and its application to international markets. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 87–95. doi:10.1111/j.1470–6431.2009.00848.x
46.
MackayH. (2005). New connections, familiar settings: Issues in the ethnographic study of new media use at home. In HineC. (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the Internet (pp. 129–140). Oxford, UK: Berg.
47.
MahatanankoonP. (2007). The effects of personality traits and optimum stimulation level on text-messaging activities and m-commerce intention. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12(1), 7–30. doi:10.2753/JEC1086–4415120101
48.
MathwickC.RigdonE. (2004). Play, flow, and the online search experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 324–332. doi:10.1086/422111
49.
MedvinskyM. (2017). Learner engagement and technology integration In RuthmannS. A.MantieR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of technology and music education. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
MesnageC. S.RafiqA.DixonS.BrixtelR. P. (2011). Music discovery with social networks. Paper presented at the Workshop on Music Recommendation and Discovery, WOMRAD 2011, Chicago, IL, USA.
51.
MichieliseM.ParttiH. (2015). Producing a meaningful difference: The significance of small creative acts in composing within online participatory remix practices. International Journal of Music Education, Special Issue: Music Learning, User-generated Content, and Participatory Culture, 8(1), 27–40. doi:10.1386/ijcm.8.1.27_1
52.
MillsS. W. (2015). Swamp sistas: Beth McKee and a socio-musical swamp revival online and real time. International Journal of Music Education, Special Issue: Music Learning, User-generated Content, and Participatory Culture, 8(1), 105–122. doi:10.1386/ijcm.8.1.105_1
53.
NorthA. C. (2010). Individual differences in musical taste. The American Journal of Psychology, 123(2), 199–208. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.2.0199
54.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
NowakR. (2014). Understanding everyday uses of music technologies in the digital age. In BennettA.RobardsB. (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures: The Internet, belonging and new cultural configurations (pp. 146–161). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
NuttallP.ArnoldS.CarlessL.CrockfordL.FinnamoreK.FrazierR.HillA. (2011). Understanding music consumption through a tribal lens. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 152–159. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.12.007
57.
O’FlynnJ. (2015). Strengthening choral community: The interaction of face-to-face and online activities amongst a college choir. International Journal of Community Music, 8(1), 73–92. doi:10.1386/ijcm.8.1.73_1
58.
PalmquistJ. E.BarnesG. V. (2015). Participation in the school orchestra and string teachers Facebook v2 group: an online community of practice. International Journal of Community Music, 8(1), 93–103. doi:10.1386/ijcm.8.1.93_1
59.
ParttiH.KarlsenS. (2010). Reconceptualising musical learning: New media, identity and community in music education. Music Education Research, 12(4), 369–382.
60.
PepplerK. (2017). Interest-driven music education: Youth, technology, and music making today. In RuthmannS. A.MantieR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of technology and music education (pp. 291–308). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
Pettijohn IIT. F.LaPieneK. E.PettijohnT. F.HortingA. L. (2012). Relationships between Facebook intensity, friendship contingent self-esteem, and personality in U.S. college students. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(1), 2. doi:10.5817/CP2012–1–2
62.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.SchumannD. T. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating effect of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.
63.
RainieL.WellmanB. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.StillwellD. J.KosinskiM.GoslingS. D.LevitinD. J. (2012). The song remains the same: A replication and extension of the MUSIC model. Music Perception, 30(2), 161–185. doi:10.1525/mp.2012.30.2.161
65.
SalavuoM. (2006). Open and informal online communities as forums of collaborative musical activities and learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23(3), 253–271. doi:10.1017/S0265051706007042
66.
SalavuoM. (2008). Social media as an opportunity for pedagogical change in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1(2), 121–136. doi:10.1386/jmte.1.2 and 3.121/1
67.
San PascualM. (2013). Facebook music: A big vision, mostly unrealized. In BylinK. (Ed.), Divergent Streams (pp. 102–107). Leanpub.
SmockA. D.EllisonN. B.LampeC.WohnD. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
70.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. doi:10.2307/256865
71.
TarrantM.NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2002). Youth identity and music. In MacDonaldR. A. R.HargreavesD. J.MiellD. (Eds.), Musical identities (pp. 134–150). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
72.
TepperS. J.HargittaiE. (2009). Pathways to music exploration in a digital age. Poetics, 37(3), 227–249. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.03.003
73.
TobiasE. S. (2013). Toward convergence: Adapting music education to contemporary society and participatory culture. Music Educators Journal, 99(4), 29–36.
74.
TobiasE. S. (2015). Participatory and digital cultures in practice: Perspectives and possibilities in a graduate music course. International Journal of Community Music, 8(1), 7–26. doi:10.1386/ijcm.8.1.7_1
75.
UsherB. (2015). Twitter and the celebrity interview. Celebrity Studies, 6(3), 306–321. doi:10.1080/19392397.2015.1062641
76.
Van DijckJ. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture, & Society, 31(1), 41–58. doi:10.1177/0163443708098245
77.
Van DijckJ. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
78.
WaldronJ. (2013). YouTube, fanvids, forums, vlogs and blogs: Informal music learning in convergent on and offline music community. The International Journal of Music Education, 31(1), 91–105. doi:10.1177/0255761411434861
79.
WaldronJ. (2018). Online music communities and social media. In BartleetB.-L.HigginsL. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of community music (pp. 109–130). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
80.
WaldronJ.MantieR.ParttiH.TobiasE. S. (2018). A brave new world: Theory to practice in participatory culture and music education. Music Education Research, 20(3), 289–304. doi:10.1080/14613808.2017.1339027
81.
WaldronJ.VeblenK. K. (2008). The medium is the message: Cyberspace, community, and music learning. The Journal of Music, Education, and Technology, 1(2), 99–112. doi:10.1386/jmte.1.2 and 3.99/1
82.
YiM. Y.FiedlerK. D.ParkJ. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393–426. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5414.2006.00132.x
