The aim of this study was to analyse the validity and reliability of the Self-Regulated Practice Behaviour Scale (SRPB) developed by Miksza (2012) for music students in Portugal. Tasks involved in this study included: (1) translating the original scale and creating a viable Portuguese adaptation for Portuguese musical performance students; (2) analysing the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the scale. The translation and adaptation of the original scale resulted in a 52-item Portuguese Self-Regulated Practice Behaviour measure (Portuguese SRPB). Students enrolled in music education programmes from eight conservatoires answered the Portuguese SRPB (n = 1,200). The results of confirmatory factor analysis show that a five-factor model presenting the five correspondent theoretical dimensions of self-regulation (motive, method, behaviour, time management, and social influence) achieved the best fit to the data collected. All Portuguese SRPB dimensions were predictive of students’ reports of average practice efficiency, grades, and practice time, highlighting preliminary evidence of predictive validity. The internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from good to excellent (α = .71 to .84). The findings suggest that the Portuguese SRPB produced a valid and reliable measure of the self-regulatory practice behaviour of Portuguese conservatoire students.
AlexanderP. A. (2013). Calibration: What is it and why it matters? An introduction to the special issue on calibrating calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 1–3.
2.
AraújoM. V. (2016). Measuring self-regulated practice behaviours in highly skilled musicians. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 278–292.
3.
AustinJ. R.BergM. H. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 535–558.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BanduraA. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269–290.
6.
BartolomeS. J. (2009). Naturally emerging self-regulated practice behaviors among highly successful beginning recorder students. Research Studies in Music Education, 31(1), 37–51.
7.
BoekaertsM. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.
8.
ChristensenS. E. (2010). Practicing strategically: The difference between knowledge and action in two eight-grade students’ independent instrumental practice. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 29(1), 22–32.
9.
ClearyT. J.ZimmermanB. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537–550.
10.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
11.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; It’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56(4), 310–321.
12.
ErsozluZ. N.MikszaP. (2015). A Turkish adaptation of a self-regulated practice behavior scale for collegiate music students. Psychology of Music, 43(6), 855–869.
13.
GreeneW. H.HensherD. A. (2010). Modelling ordered choices: A primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
HallamS. (1997). What do we know about practising? Towards a model synthesising the research literature. In JørgensenH.LehmanA. (Eds.), Does practice make perfect? Current theory and research on instrumental music practice (pp. 179–231). Oslo, Norway: Norges musikkhøgskole.
15.
HallamS. (2001). Learning in music: Complexity and diversity. In PhilpottC.PlummeridgeC. (Eds.), Issues in music learning (pp. 61–75). London, UK: Routledge Farmer.
16.
HallamS.RintaT.VarvarigouM.CreechA.PapageorgiI.GomesT.LanipekunJ. (2012). The development of practising strategies in young people. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 652–680.
17.
HewittM. P. (2015). Self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and music performance of secondary-level band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(3), 298–313.
18.
JørgensenH. (2004). Strategies for individual practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 85–104). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
JørgensenH. (2008). Instrumental practice: Quality and quantity. Finnish Journal of Music Education, 11(1–2), 8–18.
20.
KitsantasA.ZimmermanB. J. (2009). College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 54, 932–940.
21.
KostonsD.van GogT.PaasF. (2010). Self-assessment and task selection in learner-controlled instruction: Differences between effective and ineffective learners. Computers & Education, 54, 932–940.
22.
KostonsD.van GogT.PaasF. (2012). Training self-assessment and task selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121–132.
23.
Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used by student musicians during music practice. Music Education Research, 10(1), 91–106.
24.
MadeiraL. (2014). Estratégias de auto-regulação da aprendizagem no ensino instrumental (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Aveiro, Portugal.
25.
McPhersonG. E. (2005). From child to musician: Skill development during the beginning stages of learning an instrument. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 322–336.
26.
McPhersonG. E.McCormickJ. (2006). Self-efficacy and music performance. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 322–336.
27.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 169–186.
28.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective on developing performance skills. In ColwellR.WebsterP. R. (Eds.), MENC handbook of research on music learning (Vol. 2: Applications, pp. 130–175). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
MikszaP. (2007). Effective practice: An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(4), 359–375.
30.
MikszaP. (2012). The development of a measure of self-regulated practice behavior for beginning and intermediate instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(4), 321–338.
31.
MikszaP. (2015). The effect of self-regulation instruction on the performance achievement, musical self-efficacy, and practicing of advanced wind players. Psychology of Music, 43(2), 219–243.
32.
MikszaP.TanL. (2015). Predicting collegiate wind players’ practice efficiency, flow, and self-efficacy for self-regulation: An exploratory study of relationships between teachers’ instruction and students’ practicing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(2), 162–179.
33.
MizonG. E.RichardJ.-F. (1986). The encompassing principle and its application to non-nested hypothesis tests. Econometrica, 54(3), 657–678.
34.
NielsenS. G. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3(1), 155–168.
35.
NielsenS. G. (2008). Achievement goals, learning strategies and instrumental performance. Music Education Research, 10(2), 235–247.
36.
NielsenS. G. (2012). Epistemic beliefs and self-regulated learning in music students. Psychology of Music, 40(3), 324–338.
PerelsF.GürtlerT.SchmitzB. (2005). Training of self-regulatory and problem solving competence. Learning and Instruction, 15, 123–139.
39.
PintrichP. R.De GrootE. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
40.
RozendaalJ. S.MinnaertA.BoekaertsM. (2005). The influence of teacher perceived administration of self-regulated learning on students’ motivation and information-processing. Learning and Instruction, 15, 141–160.
41.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
42.
SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32(4), 195–208.
43.
SlobodaJ. A.DavidsonJ. W.HoweM. J. A.MooreD. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology, 87(2), 287–309.
44.
SmithB. P. (2005). Goal orientation, implicit theory of ability, and collegiate instrumental music practice. Psychology of Music, 33(1), 36–57.
45.
StGeorgeJ. M.HolbrookA. P.CantwellR. H. (2012). Learning patterns in music practice: Links between disposition, practice strategies and outcomes. Music Education Research, 14(2), 243–263.
46.
VarelaW.AbramiP. C.UpitisR. (2016). Self-regulation and music learning: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 44(1), 55–74.
47.
VerbeekM. (2008). A modern guide to econometrics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
48.
WilliamonA.ValentineE. (2000). Quantity and quality of musical practice as predictors of performance quality. British Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 353–376.
49.
ZhukovK. (2009). Effective practising: A research perspective. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 3–12.
50.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73–86.
51.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York, NY: Academic Press.
52.
ZimmermanB. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183.
