Two studies considered whether psychological variables could predict everyday music listening practices more than those demographic and technology-related variables studied predominantly hitherto. Study 1 focused on music-listening devices, while Study 2 focused on music selection strategies (e.g. playlists). Study 1 indicated the existence of a one-dimensional identity based on music technology. Further, psychological variables (such as innovativeness and self-efficacy) predicted whether individuals possess such an identity. Moreover, while psychological variables predicted whether individuals preferred ‘familiarized’ advantages inherent to listening devices, a preference for ‘progressive’ advantages was predicted by technological behaviors. Study 2 supported the first study in terms of identity, and demonstrated that a different pattern of variables predicted playlist listening from listening to music via shuffle. More generally, the findings suggest the utility of applying constructs from consumer psychology to everyday music-listening behaviors.
AgarwalR.KarahannaE. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.
2.
AgarwalR.PrasadJ. (1998). The antecedents and consequences of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 15–29.
3.
ArmstrongV. (2001). Theorizing gender and musical composition in the computerized classroom. Women: A Cultural Review, 12(1), 35–43. doi:10.1080/09574040110034101
4.
AssaelH. (2005). A demographic and psychographic profile of heavy internet users and users by type of internet usage. Journal of Advertising Research, 45(1), 93–123.
5.
AvdeeffM. (2012). Technological engagement and musical eclecticism: An examination of contemporary listening practices. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 9(2), 265–285.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
7.
Batt-RawdenK.DeNoraT. (2005). Music and informal learning in everyday life. Music Education Research, 7(3), 289–304.
8.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9.
BrunerG. C.KumarA. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553–558.
10.
BrunerG. C.KumarA. (2007). Gadget lovers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 329–339.
11.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2007). Personality and music: Can traits explain how people use music in everyday life?British Journal of Psychology, 98, 175–185. doi:10.1348/000712606X111177
12.
Chamorro-PremuzicT.SwamiV.CermakovaB. (2012). Individual differences in music consumption are predicted by uses of music and age rather than emotional intelligence, neuroticism, extraversion or openness. Psychology of Music, 40(3), 285–300. doi:10.1177/0305735610381591
13.
ChungJ.TanF. B. (2004). Antecedents of perceived playfulness: An exploratory study on user acceptance of general information-searching Websites. Information & Management, 41(7), 869–881. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.016
14.
CraigR. T. (2007). Issue forum introduction: Mobile media and communication: What are the important questions?Communication Monographs, 74(3), 386–388. doi:10.1080/03637750701543501
15.
CunninghamS.BainbridgeD.FalconerA. (2006, October). ‘More of an art than a science:’ Supporting the creation of playlists and mixes. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2006), University of Victoria: Victoria, Canada.
16.
DittmarH. (2008). Understanding the impact of consumer culture. In DittmarH. (Ed.), Consumer culture, identity, and well-being (pp. 1–24). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
17.
FolkestadG. (2007). Technology and music education in Sweden. In BreslerL. (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education, Volume 16 (pp. 1329–1330). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
18.
GilesD.PietrzykowskiS.ClarkK. (2007). The psychological meaning of personal record collections and the impact of changing technological forms. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 429–443.
19.
GoldsmithR. (2001). Using the Domain Specific Innovativeness Scale to identify innovative Internet consumers. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2), 149–158.
20.
GoldsmithR.FlynnL.GoldsmithE. (2003). Innovative consumers and market mavens. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(4), 54–64.
21.
GoldsmithR. E.HofackerC. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 209–221.
22.
GreasleyA. E.LamontA.SlobodaJ. A. (2013). Exploring musical preferences: An in-depth qualitative study of adults’ liking for music in their personal collections. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10(4), 402–427. doi:10.1080/14780887.2011.647259
23.
GreasleyA. E.LamontA. (2011). Exploring engagement with music in everyday life using experience sampling methodology. Musicae Scientiae, 15(1), 45–71. doi:10.1177/1029864910393417
24.
HargreavesD. J.MiellD.MacdonaldR. A. R. (2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important? In MacDonaldR. A. R.HargravesD. J.MiellD. (Eds.), Musical identities (pp. 1–20). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
HeyeA.LamontA. (2010). Mobile listening situations in everyday life: The use of MP3 players while travelling. Musicae Scientiae, 14(1), 95–120. doi:10.1177/102986491001400104
26.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
ImS.BayusB. L.MasonC. H. (2003). An empirical study of innate consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 61–73. doi:10.1177/0092070302238602
28.
JuslinP. N.LiljeströmS.VästfjällD.BarradasG.SilvaA. (2008). An experience sampling study of emotional reactions to music: Listener, music, and situation. Emotion, 8(5), 668–683. doi:10.1037/a0013505
29.
KangN. E.YoonW. C. (2008). Age- and experience-related user behavior differences in the use of complicated electronic devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 425–437. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.12.003
KulviwatS.BrunerG. C.Al-ShuridahO. (2009). The role of social influence on adoption of high tech innovations: The moderating effect of public/private consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62, 706–712. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.04.014
32.
KwonO.ChoiK.KimM. (2007). User acceptance of context-aware services: Self-efficacy, user innovativeness and perceived sensitivity on contextual pressure. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(6), 483–498. doi:10.1080/01449290600709111
33.
Lambert-PandraudR.LaurentG. (2010). Why do older consumers buy older brands? The role of attachment and declining innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 74, 104–121. doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.5.104
34.
LangfordP. H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and abridging Shafer’s (1999a) Big Five markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1127–1140. doi:10.1016/S0191–8869(02)00323–9
35.
LeeY.LeeJ.LeeZ. (2006). Social influence on technology acceptance behavior: Self-identity theory perspective. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2 & 3), 60–75.
36.
LeongT.HowardS.VetereF. (2008). Take a chance on me: Using randomness for the design of digital devices. Interactions, 15(3), 16–19. doi:10.1145/1353782.1353787
37.
LeongT.VetereF.HowardS. (2008). Abdicating choice: The rewards of letting go. Digital Creativity, 19(4), 233–243. doi:10.1080/14626260802550777
38.
LimH.LeeH. (2010). Development of consumer techno segmentation and its application to international markets. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 87–95. doi:10.1111/j.1470–6431.2009.00848.x
39.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2011). Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 108–134. doi:10.1348/000712610X506831
40.
LyonsB.HendersonK. (2005). Opinion leadership in a computer-mediated environment. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(5), 319–329. doi:10.1002/cb.22
41.
MacDonaldR. A. R.HargreavesD. J.MiellD. (2009). Musical identities. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 462–470). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
MahatanankoonP. (2007). The effects of personality traits and optimum stimulation level on text-messaging activities and m-commerce intention. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12(1), 7–30. doi:10.2753/JEC1086–4415120101
43.
MickD. G.FournierS. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 123–147.
44.
MolteniL.OrdaniniA. (2003). Consumption patterns, digital technology and music downloading. Long Range Planning, 36, 389–406. doi:10.1016/S0024–6301(03)00073–6
45.
NorthA. C. (2010). Individual differences in musical taste. The American Journal of Psychology, 123(2), 199–208. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.2.0199
46.
NorthA. C.DavidsonJ. W. (2013). Musical taste, employment, education, and global region. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 432–441. doi:10.1111/sjop.12065
47.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2003). Is music important?The Psychologist, 16(8), 406–410.
48.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J.HargreavesJ. J. (2004). Uses of music in everyday life. Music Perception, 22(1), 41–77. doi:10.1525/mp.2004.22.1.41
50.
O’HaraK.BrownB. (2006). Consuming music together: Introduction and overview. In O’HaraK.BrownB. (Eds.), Consuming music together: Social and collaborative aspects of music consumption technologies (pp. 3–18). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Springer.
51.
O’NeillS. A. (1997). Gender and music. In HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp. 46–63). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
RentfrowP.GoldbergL. R.ZilcaR. (2010). Listening, watching, and reading: The structure and correlates of entertainment preferences. Journal of Personality, 79(2), 23–258. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2010.00662.x
53.
RentfrowP.GoslingS. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236–1256. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.84.6.1236
54.
RentfrowP.GoslingS. (2006). Message in a ballad: The role of music preference in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17(3), 236–242. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01691.x
55.
RentfrowP. J.McDonaldJ. A. (2010). Preference, personality, and emotion. In JuslinP. N.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 669–695). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
SpreitzerG. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
57.
TepperS. J.HargittaiE. (2009). Pathways to music exploration in a digital age. Poetics, 37, 227–249. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.03.00
58.
ThatcherJ.PerrewéP. (2004). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–396. doi:10.2307/4132314
59.
ThorbjørsenH.PedersenP. E.NysveenH. (2007). ‘This is who I am’: Identity expressiveness and the theory of planned behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 24(9), 763–785. doi:10.1002/mar.20183
60.
YiM.FiedlerK.ParkJ. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 393–426. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5414.2006.00132.x
61.
WassermanI. M.Richmond-AbbottM. (2005). Gender and the internet: Causes and variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 252–270.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
