The present research examines adolescents’ appreciation of popular music and musicians against the background of the Optimal Distinctiveness Theory (ODT; Brewer, 1991). Within the framework of ODT, adolescents should favour music which maintains a balance between feelings of inclusion and distinctiveness (Abrams, 2009). Our research contributes to ODT by developing a diagnostic instrument, focusing on both the music and image, in order to measure objectively the degree of typicality. We hypothesized typicality is an essential factor which indicates an optimal level of distinctiveness of musical and personal style and thus predicts music appreciation in terms of a social identity. In the studies, adolescent participants evaluated different songs and images from actual popular music. Based on the methods of Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT), we identified 11 items to determine the typicality of music stimuli and 5 items to determine the typicality of musicians’ images. The results show that typicality is a reliable predictor of optimal distinctiveness and adolescent music appreciation (p < .01). Finally, we discuss additional experimental use of these scales and implications for research in the context of adolescents’ musical identities.
AakerJ. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.
2.
AbramsD. (2009). Social identity on a national scale: Optimal distinctiveness and young people’s self-expression through musical preference. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(3), 303–317.
3.
BakagiannisS.TarrantM. (2006). Can music bring people together? Effects of shared musical preference on intergroup bias in adolescence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 129–136.
4.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244.
5.
BartlettJ. C.HurryS.ThorleyW. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory & Cognition, 12(3), 219–228.
6.
BondT.FoxC. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7.
BorgstedtS. (2008). Der Musik-Star: Vergleichende Imageanalysen von Alfred Brendel, Stefanie Hertel und Robbie Williams [The music star: comparative image analyses of Alfred Brendel, Stefanie Hertel and Robbie Williams]. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.
8.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
9.
CohrdesC.LehmannM.KopiezR. (2012). Typikalität, Musiker-Image und die Musikbewertung durch Jugendliche [Typicality, a musician’s image and adolescents’ music evaluation]. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 81–101.
10.
EnghM. (2006). Popstars als Marke: Identitätsorientiertes Markenmanagement für die musikindustrielle Künstlerentwicklung und -vermarktung [Popstars as brand names: identity-oriented brand management for the development and commercialization of artists in the music industry]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
11.
ForsterK. I.ForsterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, 1(1), 116–124.
12.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
13.
HargreavesD. J.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (2002). Musical identities. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
HekkertP.SneldersD.van WieringenP. C. W. (2003). “Most advanced, yet acceptable”: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 111–124.
15.
HornseyM. J.JettenJ. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 248–264.
16.
IvaldiA.O’NeillS. (2009). Talking privilege: Barriers to musical attainment in adolescents’ talk of musical role models. British Journal of Music Education, 26(1), 43–56.
17.
KaplanR.SaccuzzoD. (2004). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
18.
KirkR. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
19.
MirandaD.ClaesM. (2009). Music listening, coping, peer affiliation and depression in adolescence. Psychology of Music, 37(2), 215–233.
20.
MuckP.HellB.GoslingS. (2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument: A self-peer study on the German adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 166–175.
21.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus User’s Guide (Version 6). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22.
NaumannL. P.VazireS.RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(12), 1661–1671.
23.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1995). Subjective complexity, familiarity, and liking for popular music. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind & Brain, 14(1), 77–93.
24.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1999). Music and adolescent identity. Music Education Research, 1(1), 75–92.
25.
PlatzF.KopiezR. (2012). When the eye listens: A meta-analysis of how audio-visual presentation enhances the appreciation of music performance. Music Perception, 30(1), 71–83.
26.
OakesP. (1987). The salience of social categories. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117–141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
RentfrowP.GoslingS. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(6), 1236–1256.
29.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2007). The content and validity of music-genre stereotypes among college students. Psychology of Music, 35(2), 306–326.
30.
RentfrowP. J.McDonaldJ. A.OldmeadowJ. A. (2009). You are what you listen to: Young people’s stereotypes about music fans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(3), 329–344.
31.
ReynoldsT.GutmanJ. (1984). Advertising is image management. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(1), 27–37.
32.
SaarikallioS.ErkkiläJ. (2007). The role of music in adolescents’ mood regulation. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 88–109.
33.
SchäferT.SedlmeierP. (2009). From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music, 37(3), 279–300.
34.
SchellenbergE. G.PeretzI.VieillardS. (2008). Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: Effects of exposure, Cognition & Emotion, 22(2), 218–237.
35.
ShevyM. (2008). Music genre as cognitive schema: Extra musical associations with country and hip-hop music. Psychology of Music, 36(4), 477–498.
36.
SnyderM.SwannW. (1976). When actions reflect attitudes: The politics of impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 1034–1042.
TarrantM.NorthA.HargreavesD. (2001). Social categorization, self-esteem, and the estimated musical preferences of male adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 565–581.
39.
TurnerJ.HoggM.OakesP.ReicherS.WetherellM. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40.
WuM. L.AdamsR. J. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne, Australia: Educational measurement solutions.
WyerN.CalviniG.NashA.MilesN. (2010). Priming in interpersonal contexts: Implications for affect and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1693–1705.
