This article examines empirically and systematically whether a string quartet (SQ) ensemble is perceived as a self-managed team (SMT). SMTs, which were initially employed in the industrial world, are groups of employees that have a total responsibility for a defined project. The hypothesis that the SQ would exhibit more typical SMT characteristics than other music ensembles was established in one experiment and reconfirmed in a second experiment. The assessment of the SMT characteristics in these experiments was based on an adaptation of the Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness questionnaire that had been originally devised for working groups in the business context, and was proven in the present study to be appropriate for music ensembles as well. Possible ways to implement these interdisciplinary findings are suggested.
AppelbaumS. H.BethuneM.TannenbaumR. (1999). Downsizing and the emergence of self-managed teams. Participation and Empowerment: An International Journal, 7, 109–30.
2.
AttaranM.NguyenT. T. (2000). Creating the right structural fit for self-directed teams. Team Performance Management, 6, 5–33.
3.
BaronJ. H. (1998). Intimate music: History of the idea of chamber music. New York: Pendragon Press.
4.
BeekunR. I. (1989). Assessing the effectiveness of sociotechnical interventions: Antidote or fad?Human Relations, 47, 877–897.
5.
BelbinR. M. (1993). Teams roles at work. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
6.
BlumD. (1986). The art of quartet playing: The Quarneri Quartet in conversation with David Blum. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
BrinnerB. (1995). Knowing music, making music: Javanese gamelan and the theory of musical competence and interaction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
8.
ButterworthT. (1990). Detroit String Quartet. In HackmanJ. R. (Ed.), Groups that work and those that don’t (pp. 207–224). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CapozzoliT. (2006). How to succeed with self-directed work teams. Supervision, 67, 25–26.
10.
CarsonC. M.MosleyD. C.BoyarS. L. (2004). Goal orientation and supervisory behavior: Impacting SMWT effectiveness. Team Performance Management, 10, 152–162.
11.
CliffordP. G.SohalA. S. (1998). Developing self-directed work teams. Management Decision, 36, 77–84.
12.
CohenS. G. (1994). Designing effective self-managing teams. In BeyerleinM. M.JohnsonD. A. (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 67–102). London: JAI Press.
13.
CohenS. G.LedfordG. E. (1994). The effectiveness of self-managing teams: Quasi-experiment. Human Relations, 47, 13–43.
14.
CohenS. G.LedfordG. E.SpreitzerG. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643–676.
15.
CummingsT. G. (1981). Designing effective work groups. In NystromP. C.StarbuckW. H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (pp. 250–271). London: Oxford.
16.
DavidsonJ. W.GoodJ. M. (2002). Social and music coordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music, 30, 186–201.
17.
DavidsonJ. W.KingE. C. (2004). Strategies for ensemble practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 105–122). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Dogantan-DackM. (2008). Collaborative processes and aesthetics of interaction in chamber music performance: The Alchemy Project. In LaskerG. E.LuzA. M.DackJ.Dogantan-DackM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Systems Research in the Arts and Humanities (pp. 7–12). Ontario: International Institute for Advanced Studies.
19.
DruskatV. U.WheelerJ. V. (2003). Managing from the boundaries: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 435–457.
20.
DunsbyJ. (1995). Performing music – shared concerns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
21.
EllisC. S. (2005). All for one. Strings, 19, 47–52.
22.
EmeryF. E.TristE. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems. In JonesC. W. (Ed.), Management science, models, and techniques (pp. 83–97). London: Pergamon Press.
23.
ErezA.LepineJ. A.ElmsH. (2002). Effects of rotated leadership and peer evaluation of the functioning and effectiveness of self-managed teams: A quasi-experiment. Personnel Psychology, 55, 929–948.
24.
FoggC. D. (1994). Team-based strategic planning. New York: Amacon.
25.
FordL.DavidsonJ. W. (2003). An investigation of members’ roles in wind quintets. Psychology of Music, 31, 53–74.
26.
FrankforterS. A.ChristensenS. L. (2005). Finding competitive advantages in self-managed work teams. Business Forum, 27, 20–24.
27.
Gomez-MejiaL.BalkinD. B.CardyR. L. (1988). Managing human resources. Mahwah, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
GoodmanP. S.DevadasR.HughsonT. L. (1988). Groups and productivity: Analyzing the effectiveness of self-managing teams. In CampbellJ. P.CampbellR. J. (Eds.), Productivity in organizations (pp. 295–325). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
HackmanJ. R. (1986). The psychology of self-management in organizations. In PallakM. S.PerloffR. (Eds.), Psychology and work: Productivity, change, and employment (pp. 85–136). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
30.
HackmanJ. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
HackmanJ. R.LawlerE. E. (1971). Employee reaction to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259–266.
32.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 250–279.
33.
HackmanJ. R.WaltonR. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In GoodmanP. S. (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72–119). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
HoffmanM. (2000). Inside the string quartet. Strings, 15, 66–73.
35.
KingE.C. (2006). The roles of student musicians in quartet rehearsals. Psychology of Music, 34, 262–282.
36.
LagaceM. (2007, September). Managing the Medici String Quartet. HBS: Working Knowledge, 1–7.
37.
LangfredC. W. (2000). The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 563–585.
38.
LawlerE. E. (1986). High-involvement management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
LawlerE. E.MohrmanS. A.LedfordG. E. (1992). Employee involvement and Total Quality Management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
LoftA. (1992). Ensembles – a rehearsal guide to thirty great works of chamber music. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press.
41.
ManzC. C. (1992). Self-leading work teams: Moving beyond self-management myths. Human Relations, 45, 1119–1140.
42.
ManzC. C.SimsH. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 106–128.
43.
MenuhinY. (1996). The violin. New York and Paris: Flammarion.
44.
MilkovichG. T.BoudreauJ. W. (1997). Human resource management. Chicago: Irwin Professional Publishing.
45.
MollemanE. (2000). Modalities of self-managing teams: The must, may, can and will of local decision making. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20, 889–910.
46.
MoravecM.JohannessenO. J.HjelmasT. A. (1998). ‘The well managed SMT. Management Review87: 56–58.
47.
MorgesonF. P. (2005). The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 497–508.
48.
MothusamyS. K.WheelerJ. V.SimmonsB. L. (2005). Self-managed work teams: Enhancing organizational innovativeness. Organizational Development, 23, 53–66.
49.
MurnighanJ. K.ConlonD. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 1–18.
50.
NisselM. (1998). Married to the Amadeus: Life with a string quartet. London: Giles de la Mare.
51.
OrsburnJ. D.MoranL. (2000). The new self-directed work teams: Mastering the challenge. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
OrsburnJ. D.MoranL.MusselwhiteE.ZengerJ. H. (1990). Self-directed work teams: The new American challenge. Homewood, IL: Business One Erwin.
53.
PageA. (1964). Playing string quartets. London: William Clowes & Sons.
54.
PolleyD.RibbensB. (1998). Sustaining self-managed teams: A process approach to team wellness. Team Performance Management, 4, 3–21.
55.
PolleyD.Van DyneL. (1994). The limits and liabilities of self-managing work teams. In BeyerleinM. M.JohnsonD. A. (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of self-managing work teams (vol. 1, pp. 1–38). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
56.
PoulsonI. I.ChristianF.AbrahamS. C. (1996). The Portland String Quartet. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 197–211.
57.
RatnerL. G. (1995). The Beethoven string quartets: Compositional strategies and rhetoric. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
RobbinsS. P. (2003). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
59.
RoundsD. (1999). The Four and the one: In praise of string quartets. Canada: Cypress House.
60.
SagoeI. (1994). Why are self-managed teams so popular?The Journal of Quality and Participation, 17, 64–69.
61.
SchweigerD. M.SandbergW. R. (1989). The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 31–4.
62.
ScottH. K. (2007). The secret of success. Strings, 21, 59–64.
63.
SeddonF. A.BiasuttiM. (2009). Modes of communication between members of a string quartet. Small Group Research, 40(2), 115–137.
64.
SethV. (1999). An equal music. New York: Phoenix House.
65.
SharpI. S.KagioglouJ. M. (1997). Communicating through self-directed teams within an SME learning organization. Journal of Workplace Learning, 9, 199–205.
66.
SolanskyS. T. (2008). Leadership style and team processes in self-managed teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 332–341.
67.
TovstigaG.OdenthalS.GoernerS. (2005). Sense making and learning in complex organizations: The string quartet revisited. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1, 215–231.
68.
WallT. D.KempN. J.JacksonP. R.CleggC. W. (1986). Outcomes of autonomous work groups: A long term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 280–304.
69.
WellinsR. S. (1992). Building a self-directed work team. Training & Development, 46, 24–28.
70.
WellinsR. S.ByhamW. C.WilsonJ. M. (1991). Empowered teams: Creating self-directed work groups that improve quality, productivity and participation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71.
YeattsD. E.CreadyC.RayB.DeWittA.QueenC. (2004). Self-managed work teams in nursing homes: Implementing and empowering nurse aide team. The Gerontologist, 44, 256–261.
72.
YoungV. M.ColmanA. M. (1979) Some psychological processes in string quartets. Psychology of Music, 7, 12–6.
