Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Studies have shown that the transposed-letter effect is moderated by visual factors, but whether the transposed-character effect in the Chinese language is moderated by visual factors such as contrast display remains unknown. Accordingly, we conducted two experiments using a single-presentation lexical decision task with real words (满面春风), transposed-character (满春面风) and replacement-character (满而泰风) pseudowords that manipulated the visual features of the stimuli, with four characters in the same color or the first two characters and the last two characters in different colors (满面春风 vs 满面春风) in Experiment 1 and critical characters in plain or highlighted text (满面春风 vs 满面春风) in Experiment 2, to explore whether contrast display moderates the transposed-character effect. The results revealed that color segmentation and critical character highlighting did not significantly moderate the transposed-character effect. The stability of the transposed-character effect suggests that this effect may be influenced mainly by language factors. This is important for achieving a comprehensive understanding of the transposed-character effect and the core mechanism of the Chinese reading process.

Keywords

transposed-character effect visual contrast display Chinese characters identity and position processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baayen

R. H.

Davidson

D. J.

Bates

D. M.

(2008). Mixed–effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

B. M.

Walker

S. C.

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Beyersmann

McCormick

S. F.

Rastle

(2013). Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(12), 2389–2410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.782326

Bian

Cui

Yan

G. L.

(2010). Effects of the transposed morpheme on the Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from eye movement data. Psychological Research, 03, 29–35.

Brysbaert

Stevens

(2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10

Cai

Brysbaert

(2010). SUBTLEX–CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5, Article e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729

Chang

Hao

L. S.

Zhao

S. N.

Paterson

K. B.

Wang

J. X.

(2020). Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 2793–2801. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02050-x

Chetail

Mathey

(2009). Activation of syllable units during visual recognition of French words in Grade 2. Journal of Child Language, 36, 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000908009197

10.

Christianson

Johnson

R. L.

Rayner

(2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaming, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1327–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/https://doi.org/0278-7393.31.6.1327

11.

Collis

N. L.

Kohnen

Kinoshita

(2013). The role of visual spatial attention in adult developmental dyslexia. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.705305

12.

Giovagnoli

Vicari

Tomassetti

Menghini

(2016). The role of visual-spatial abilities in dyslexia: Age differences in children’s Reading? Frontiers in Psycholology, 7, Article 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01997

13.

Gomez

Ratcliff

Perea

(2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/e512682013-035

14.

Grainger

(2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578013

15.

Grainger

(2018). Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1314515

16.

Grainger

Dufau

Ziegler

J. C.

(2016). A vision of reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.008

17.

Grainger

Granier

J.-P.

Farioli

Van Assche

van Heuven

W. J. B.

(2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.865

18.

Grainger

van Heuven

W. J. B.

(2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Bonin

(Ed.), Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1–23). Nova Science Publishers.

19.

J. J.

X. S.

(2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272–281. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0749-5

20.

Häikiö

Hyönä

Bertram

(2015). The role of syllables in word recognition among beginning Finnish readers: Evidence from eye movements during Reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.982126

21.

Kezilas

Mckague

Kohnen

Badcock

N. A.

Castles

(2017). Disentangling the developmental trajectories of letter position and letter identity coding using masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000293

22.

Huang

Yao

Hyönä

(2022). Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00022-6

23.

Pollatsek

(2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese Reading. Psychological Review, 127, 1139–1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000248

24.

Luke

S. G.

Christianson

(2012). Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect. Memory & Cognition, 40, 628–641. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0170-4

25.

Marcet

Perea

Baciero

Gomez

(2019). Author accepted manuscript: Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818789876

26.

Meade

Mahnich

Holcomb

P. J.

Grainger

(2021). Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed–letter priming effects. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21, 948–959. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-021-00905-w

27.

Milena

Simone

Daniela

Massimo

Andrea

(2014). Spatial and temporal attention in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00331

28.

Norris

Kinoshita

van Casteren

(2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.002

29.

Perea

(2015). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition and Reading. In Pollatsek

Treiman

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 76–87). Oxford University Press.

30.

Perea

Acha

(2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49, 1994–2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.009

31.

Perea

Carreiras

(2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418–422. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193863

32.

Perea

Tejero

Winskel

(2015). Can colours be used to segment words when reading? Acta Psychologica, 159, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.005

33.

Perea

Wang

X. Y.

(2017). Do alternating-color words facilitate reading aloud text in Chinese? Evidence with developing and adult readers. Memory & Cognition, 45, 1160–1170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0717-0

34.

R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ .

35.

Reilhac

Jucla

Iannuzzi

Valdois

Demonet

J. F.

(2012). Effect of orthographic processes on letter identity and letter-position encoding in dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00154

36.

Rueckl

J. G.

Rimzhim

(2011). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language &Cognitive Processes, 26(4-6), 482–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.500020

37.

Sánchez-Gutiérrez

Rastle

(2013). Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(5), 988–996. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0425-0

38.

Shen

H. Y.

(2019). The image and the meaning of the Chinese character for ‘enlightenment’. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 64, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12465

39.

Taft

Zhu

Peng

(1999). Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 498–519. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2625

40.

Taran

Farah

DiFrancesco

Altaye

Vannest

Holland

Rosch

Schlaggar

B. L.

Horowitz-Kraus

(2022). The role of visual attention in dyslexia: Behavioral and neurobiological evidence. Human Brain Mapping, 43, 1720–1737. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25753

41.

Vergara-Martinez

Perea

Gómez

Swaab

T. Y.

(2013). ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency. Brain & Language, 125, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.009

42.

Wang

H. F.

(2013). Influence of highlighting, columns, and font size on visual search performance with respect to on-screen Chinese characters. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 117, 528–541. https://doi.org/10.2466/24.26.PMS.117(17z3

43.

Whitney

(2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196158

44.

E. J.

Sui

(2018). Effects of predictability on the time course of identity information and location information in Chinese word recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50, 28–43. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00606

45.

Zhan

Zhou

(2013). FMRI evidence for the interaction between orthography and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00753

46.

Zhang

Chang

Wang

(2022). Increasing intercharacter spacing reduces the transposed-character effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Visual Cognition, 30, 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2074181

47.

Zhang

Wang

(2022). The sequence effect: Character position processing in Chinese words. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877627

48.

Zhao

(2019). Skills of visual attention span in developmental dyslexia. Advances in Psychological Science, 27, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00020

49.

Zhou

Wang

A. P.

Shu

Kliegl

Yan

(2018). Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading. Memory & Cognition, 46, 729–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0797-5

The transposed-character effect is not modulated by contrast display in Chinese word recognition

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References