Holistic processing and left-side bias are both behavioral markers of expert face recognition. By contrast, expert recognition of characters in Chinese orthography involves left-side bias but reduced holistic processing, although faces and Chinese characters share many visual properties. Here, we examined whether this reduction in holistic processing of Chinese characters can be better explained by writing experience than by reading experience. Compared with Chinese nonreaders, Chinese readers who had limited writing experience showed increased holistic processing, whereas Chinese readers who could write characters fluently showed reduced holistic processing. This result suggests that writing and sensorimotor experience can modulate holistic-processing effects and that the reduced holistic processing observed in expert Chinese readers may depend mostly on writing experience. However, both expert writers and writers with limited experience showed similarly stronger left-side bias than novices did in processing mirror-symmetric Chinese characters; left-side bias may therefore be a robust expertise marker for object recognition that is uninfluenced by sensorimotor experience.
BradyN.CampbellM.FlahertyM. (2005). Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend. Brain and Cognition, 58, 334–342.
2.
BukachC. M.GauthierI.TarrJ. M. (2006). Beyond faces and modularity: The power of an expertise framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 156–166.
3.
BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (1997). Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia, 35, 685–693.
4.
ChengC. M.YangM. J. (1989). Lateralization in the visual perception of Chinese characters and words. Brain & Language, 36, 669–689.
5.
ChungK. K. H.HoC. S. (2010). Second language learning difficulties in Chinese children with dyslexia: What are the reading-related cognitive skills that contribute to English and Chinese word reading?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 195–211.
6.
GalmarB.HsiaoJ. H. (2013a). Computational exploration of task and attention modulation on holistic processing and left side bias effects in face recognition: The case of face drawing experts. In KnauffM.PauenM.SebanzN.WachsmuthI. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2356–2361). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
7.
GalmarB.HsiaoJ. H. (2013b). Holistic processing is not always a property of right hemisphere processing: Evidence from computational modeling of face recognition. Neural Information Processing: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8226, 1–8.
8.
GauthierI.BukachC. M. (2007). Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?Cognition, 103, 322–330.
9.
GauthierI.TarrM. J. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 431–446.
10.
GauthierI.WilliamsP.TarrM. J.TanakaJ. (1998). Training “greeble” experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38, 2401–2428.
11.
GeL.WangZ.McGleeryJ. P.LeeK. (2006). Activation of face expertise and the inversion effect. Psychological Science, 17, 12–16.
12.
GuanC. Q.LiuY.ChanD. H. L.YeF.PerfettiC. A. (2011). Writing strengthens orthography and alphabetic-coding strengthens phonology in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 509–522.
13.
HoC. S.KwanT. W. (2001). Hong Kong, Mainland China & Taiwan: Chinese character frequency: A trans-regional, diachronic survey. Retrieved from http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/chifreq/
14.
HoC. S.NgT.NgW. (2003). A radical approach to reading development in Chinese: The role of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 849–878.
15.
HoleG. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65–74.
16.
HsiaoJ. H.CottrellG. W. (2009). Not all visual expertise is holistic, but it may be leftist: The case of Chinese character recognition. Psychological Science, 20, 455–463.
17.
HsiaoJ. H.ShillcockR. (2006). Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: Implications for orthographic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 405–426.
18.
HsiaoJ. H.ShillcockR.LeeC. (2007). Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: Evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1280–1292.
19.
JamesK. H.AtwoodT. P. (2009). The role of sensorimotor learning in the perception of letter-like forms: Tracking the causes of neural specialization for letters. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 91–110.
20.
KimchiR.AmishavR. (2010). Faces as perceptual wholes: The interplay between component and configural properties in face processing. Visual Cognition, 18, 1034–1062.
21.
KöhlerW. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Liveright.
22.
MaurerD.Le GrandR.MondlochC. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260.
23.
McBride-ChangC.ChungK. K. H.TongX. (2011). Copying skills in relation to word reading and writing in Chinese children with and without dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 422–433.
24.
McCleeryJ. P.ZhangL.GeL.WangZ.ChristiansenE. M.LeeK.CottrellG. W. (2008). The roles of visual expertise and visual input in the face inversion effect: Behavioral and neurocomputational evidence. Vision Research, 48, 703–715.
25.
McKoneE.KanwisherN.DuchaineB. C. (2007). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 8–15.
PomerantzJ. R.PortilloM. C. (2011). Grouping and emergent features in vision: Toward a theory of basic Gestalts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1331–1349.
28.
RichlerJ. J.TanakaJ. W.BrownD. D.GauthierI. (2008). Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1356–1368.
29.
RichlerJ. J.WongY. K.GauthierI. (2011). Perceptual expertise as a shift from strategic interference to automatic holistic processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 129–134.
30.
RossionB. (2013). The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition, 21, 139–253.
ScottS. L.NelsonC. A. (2006). Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: A behavioral and electrophysiological investigation. Perception, 35, 1107–1128.
33.
ShuH. (2003). Chinese writing system and learning to read. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 274–285.
34.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
TanL. H.SpinksJ. A.EdenG. F.PerfettiC. A.SiokW. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 8781–8785.
37.
TanakaJ. W.CurranT.SheinbergD. L. (2005). The training and transfer of real-world perceptual expertise. Psychological Science, 16, 145–151.
38.
TanakaJ. W.FarahM. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225–245.
39.
TchalenkoJ.Dempere-MarcoL.HuX. P.YangG. Z. (2003). Eye movement and voluntary control in portrait drawing. In HyonaJ.RadachR.DeubelH. (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 705–727). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
40.
TsoR. V. Y.AuT. K.HsiaoJ. H. (2012). Writing facilitates learning to read in Chinese through reduction of holistic processing: A developmental study. Journal of Vision, 12(9), Article 530. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/12/9/530
41.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM.von der HeydtR. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172–1217.
42.
WagemansJ.FeldmanJ.GepshteinS.KimchiR.PomerantzJ. R.van der HelmP. A.van LeeuwenC. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1218–1252.
43.
WongA. C.-N.GauthierI. (2007). An analysis of letter expertise in a levels-of-categorization framework. Visual Cognition, 15, 854–879.
44.
WongA. C.-N.PalmeriT. J.GauthierI. (2009). Conditions for facelike expertise with objects: Becoming a Ziggerin expert—but which type?Psychological Science, 20, 1108–1117.
45.
YangM. J.ChengC. M. (1999). Hemisphere differences in accessing lexical knowledge of Chinese characters. Laterality, 4, 149–166.
46.
ZhouG.ChengZ.ZhangX.WongA. C.-N. (2012). Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 157–162.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
