It is debated whether perceptual expertise of nonface objects, such as visual words, is indicated by holistic processing, which is regarded as a marker of perceptual expertise of faces. We address this question by frequency-tagged electroencephalography. Different parts of real or pseudo Chinese characters are presented at distinctive frequencies (6 or 7.2 Hz), which induce frequency-tagged steady-state visual-evoked potentials at occipital brain areas. The intermodulation response (e.g., 6 + 7.2 = 13.2 Hz) would emerge when holistic integration takes place. Our results suggest that the intermodulation response to the real characters is left lateralized, which is contralateral to previous findings with faces. Furthermore, at the left occipital area, the intermodulation response to real characters is more prominent than pseudo characters, suggesting that holistic integration is enhanced for real characters than for pseudo ones. Taken together, our findings suggest that holistic integration is potentially a general expertise marker for both faces and non-face objects.
AissaniC.CottereauB.DumasG.ParadisA. L.LorenceauJ. (2011).
Magnetoencephalographic signatures of visual form and motion binding. Brain Research,
1408, 27–40.
2.
AlpN.KogoN.van BelleG.WagemansJ.RossionB. (2016).
Frequency tagging yields an objective neural signature of Gestalt formation. Brain and Cognition,
104, 15–24.
3.
AlpN.KohlerP. J.KogoN.WagemansJ.NorciaA. M. (2018).
Measuring integration processes in visual symmetry with frequency-tagged EEG. Scientific Reports,
8, 6969.
4.
AndersenS. K.MüllerM. M.HillyardS. A. (2011). Tracking the allocation of attention in visual scenes with steady-state evoked potentials. In PosnerM. I. (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (2nd ed., pp. 197–216).
Guilford.
5.
AndersenS. K.MullerM. M.HillyardS. A. (2015).
Attentional selection of feature conjunctions is accomplished by parallel and independent selection of single features. Journal of Neuroscience,
35, 9912–9919.
6.
BachM.MeigenT. (1999).
Do’s and don’ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials. Documenta Ophthalmologica,
99, 69–82.
7.
BertaminiM.MakinA. D. J. (2014).
Brain activity in response to visual symmetry. Symmetry,
6, 975–996.
8.
BoremanseA.NorciaA. M.RossionB. (2013).
An objective signature for visual binding of face parts in the human brain. Journal of Vision,
13, 1–18.
9.
BoremanseA.NorciaA. M.RossionB. (2014).
Dissociation of part-based and integrated neural responses to faces by means of electroencephalographic frequency tagging. European Journal of Neuroscience,
40, 2987–2997.
10.
BrainardD. H. (1997).
The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision,
10, 433–436.
11.
BukachC. M.GauthierI.TarrM. J. (2006).
Beyond faces and modularity: The power of an expertise framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
10, 159–166.
12.
Burns, E. J., Arnold, T., & Bukach, C. M. (2019). P-curving the fusiform face area: Meta-analyses support the expertise hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 104, 209–21.
13.
CaiQ.BrysbaertM. (2010).
SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One,
5, e10729.
14.
ChenH.BukachC. M.WongA. C. N. (2013).
Early electrophysiological basis of experience-associated holistic processing of Chinese characters. PLoS One,
8, e61221.
15.
ChenJ.McManusM.ValsecchiM.HarrisL. R.GegenfurtnerK. R. (2019).
Steady-state visually evoked potentials reveal partial size constancy in early visual cortex. Journal of Vision,
19, 8.
16.
ChenJ.ValsecchiM.GegenfurtnerK. R. (2017).
Enhanced brain responses to color during smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of Neurophysiology,
118, 749–754.
17.
ChenJ.ValsecchiM.GegenfurtnerK. R. (2019).
Saccadic suppression measured by steady-state visual evoked potentials. Journal of Neurophysiology,
122, 251–258.
18.
CohenL.DehaeneS.NaccacheL.LehéricyS.Dehaene-LambertzG.HénaffM.-A.MichelF. (2000).
The visual word form area. Brain,
123, 291–307.
19.
DehaeneS.CohenL. (2011).
The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
15, 254–262.
20.
DehaeneS.Le Clec’HG.PolineJ.Le BihanD.CohenL. (2002).
The visual word form area: A prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport,
13, 321–325.
21.
DelormeA.MakeigS. (2004).
EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods,
134, 9–21.
22.
DiamondR.CareyS. (1986).
Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
115, 107–117.
23.
FarahM. J.WilsonK. D.DrainM.TanakaJ. N. (1998).
What is “special” about face perception?Psychological Review,
105, 482–498.
24.
GoldJ. M.MundyP. J.TjanB. S. (2012).
The perception of a face is no more than the sum of its parts. Psychological Science,
23, 427–434.
25.
GordonN.HohwyJ.DavidsonM. J.van BoxtelJ. J. A.TsuchiyaN. (2019).
From intermodulation components to visual perception and cognition-a review. NeuroImage,
199, 480–494.
26.
GundlachC.MüllerM. M. (2013).
Perception of illusory contours forms intermodulation responses of steady state visual evoked potentials as a neural signature of spatial integration. Biological Psychology,
94, 55–60.
27.
HsiaoJ. H.CottrellG. W. (2009).
Not all visual expertise is holistic, but it may be leftist. Psychological Science,
20, 455–463.
28.
JohnstonJ. C.McClellandJ. L. (1980).
Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,
19, 503–524.
29.
LithfousS.RossionB. (2018).
Electrophysiological individual face adaptation effects with fast periodic visual stimulation resist long interruptions in adaptation. Biological Psychology,
133, 4–9.
30.
LiuC.ZhangW. T.TangY. Y.MaiX. Q.ChenH. C.TardifT.LuoY. J. (2008).
The visual word form area: Evidence from an fMRI study of implicit processing of Chinese characters. NeuroImage,
40, 1350–1361.
31.
Liu-ShuangJ.TorfsK.RossionB. (2016).
An objective electrophysiological marker of face individualisation impairment in acquired prosopagnosia with fast periodic visual stimulation. Neuropsychologia,
83, 100–113.
32.
MakinA. D. J.RamponeG.WrightA.MartinovicJ.BertaminiM. (2014).
Visual symmetry in objects and gaps. Journal of Vision,
14, 12.
33.
MakinA. D. J.WrightD.RamponeG.PalumboL.GuestM.SheehanR., Cleaver, H., & BertaminiM. (2016).
An electrophysiological index of perceptual goodness. Cerebral Cortex,
26, 4416–4434.
34.
McKoneE.KanwisherN.DuchaineB. C. (2007).
Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
11, 8–15.
35.
MorganS. T.HansenJ. C.HillyardS. A. (1996).
Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
93, 4770–4774.
36.
MüllerM. M.HübnerR. (2002).
Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials. Psychological Science,
13, 119–124.
37.
NorciaA. M.AppelbaumL. G.AlesJ. M.CottereauB. R.RossionB. (2015).
The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. Journal of Vision,
15, 4.
38.
NorciaA. M.CandyT. R.PettetM. W.VildavskiV. Y.TylerC. W. (2002).
Temporal dynamics of the human response to symmetry. Journal of Vision,
2, 1.
39.
PelliD. G. (1997).
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision,
10, 437–442.
40.
ReganM. P.ReganD. (1988).
A frequency domain technique for characterizing nonlinearities in biological systems. Journal of Theoretical Biology,
133, 293–317.
41.
RobbinsR.McKoneE. (2007).
No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition,
103, 34–79.
42.
RossionB. (2013).
The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception. Visual Cognition,
21, 139–253.
43.
RossionB.BoremanseA. (2011).
Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials. Journal of Vision,
11, 1–21.
44.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009).
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,
16, 225–237.
45.
Van LeeuwenC.LachmannT. (2004).
Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes. Perception & Psychophysics,
66, 908–925.
46.
VergeerM.KogoN.NikolaevA. R.AlpN.LoozenV.SchraepenB.WagemansJ. (2018).
EEG frequency tagging reveals higher order intermodulation components as neural markers of learned holistic shape representations. Vision Research,
152, 91–100.
47.
VinckierF.DehaeneS.JobertA.DubusJ. P.SigmanM.CohenL. (2007).
Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron,
55, 143–156.
48.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM.von der HeydtR. (2012).
A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin,
138, 1172–1217.
49.
WongA. C.-N.BukachC. M.HsiaoJ.GreensponE.AhernE.DuanY.LuiK. F. H. (2012).
Holistic processing as a hallmark of perceptual expertise for nonface categories including Chinese characters. Journal of Vision,
12, 7.
50.
WongA. C.-N.BukachC. M.YuenC.YangL.LeungS.GreensponE. (2011).
Holistic processing of words modulated by reading experience. PLoS One,
6, e20753.
51.
WongA. C.-N.WongY. K.LuiK. F. H.NgT. Y. K.NganV. S. H. (2019).
Sensitivity to configural information and expertise in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
45, 82–99.
